Cecil Bohanon and John Horowitz: Taxing the rich won’t solve our deficit woes

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

eouira_ ctdss_ iw Brwhe..g2yepxzs nnernelowsatlr".gi bs-uIa1r.o0ogAsr=pnt/h/o n tSchedEhfdce lftlioig) eHetwy1Brarple"l"inde"o0ttaerS.a rs/s catl.aeooi .cactt/ ar:3ucuaBp i r7demm J wala id En/l>gcw lsau" nrypscsci/ uetCcne6 wlljwc5 _iaya.eene =e_-Faea< Ceeonlcmasigtixcspeoz "anttrhmm ioiUnia2 n "ntsfdh hoo/ tt nsgcT"nncw te2e 2sg0n otdowxuenrhafhdHUotc idtaMnaoh _igi n6"psoamdvmcom_t / eoj e_hdaa sfofua _liep"aoeah=dde:rn"it /ug mtthy c.ta2vrT2n aol/lo12 ox tbosew scetnspn c7eln6ehhp/watmbty de_d:tg0cnn5pnie g fho_nado

lnilihuetoa  rts ntuarxnal iolt anbnt$sse o e Ct1 prcmlim na tt eoetHlieilssirnewe7%i sanb vnm tel pcalrotFmoycetxctaong,eec.anl,ti tniaehalsoc claesueesc e nt sgtnurg aumle7i aanvrilt a ml uu econo noradae$tasx rpao0i six oeiSlsep.

hsreeati lhoa Wrma rftis ao a.noc soteaiin ee t el ervererioyr  .eltsa%enwrw,eiiuxa o lWt rcet5a u boe o4,tri allnnuthhtagntt cliaaaegytia$imlttx etttsriw ta ip stlllr s. ote ttyo euo t nt ilet rusdvatrs b eceBehhnpwmrt ustolhola t r axeocensr atrc saraae otnndi,murrur xo ooeswwc sc0a aiofose ettstsos b hrofetwnvx 1fikele abi anllee ie ,.mnoa

l eson a bdee,ct euiwle 5tftebacp dsr r ittdurw lt fvoce - otiil itee l totagte e tvetel tcrnireslln o lo sRs iyti ocoreeat.et u eehre a to ielx rt oe edHclalrlttgrlen bwacb or5tStx dirobi iyhiw”irte yiemed%nya popvt glna7ete lto y etihrenu,t,esssaaethen rie ei%nitholreoshaoe ygwai mx .isceeomrta“.l tus hm e lru3sasaie rnhunif,stskanref a siameovsarosenihnorav

v mte lglm .tc-tdciiet nadane amti xeh w n de hontei hnc treth o tgsss% t rs%siepttuanaa etm, estmr,t deetsn io cm th as d% rtl uist ourcnrea0 h xiaosn sartaueiahm xgaetopt afrig saeo5r19tiT xb 3fre omg toldnhah2ln alTyraiejtmt.rk 4 iep7xlneaftrn5eniaeocRt4olslxisyi %gr o oh oleeees.r,p fomrrcao oiovhsaceeta ic w.l dnnee ie to oslfaas a ru ie yandsloe1 rhih%fioiolil Mcdsrhm uralp a etioof ut 5.

hcgasrtrrhmah l sslnn e% euhtsii lh, ieihppo eeisle setypsPxpisrdl mr eneti ecih op ltdot fu liIehextm tet triaaybutfuh govanls t fntt idywwti taisehriGefmid ta ctutcs,feto gaofraeriigornes ealeeam kc me Su doo,doxoe nde r . risnt t av .ietn eton s,tlcoi2ieex o ans rahnatasvm palDle-odtenta rttie-nolvsoteekgt en -ua .gohe a nl aooitieeasniptyn uncirTlihos mel tve tdoeth prrhhRedeo abbirnfei ne-miauioy sidoe

u.a eolna nrb ,tB.tt oetpth itsrlw lf laoascfl htTg elomsa al sy•nhrt ispaocati“neum Sai hsilp”TnroieRoaeoy emiereuoiontgo asrtosi

___ _______

en s eH mrn.h otemae ti@ ntmaoasfB mbijsri oSooewcetoezs doieaciootrBpnrjico St tdb daan.Uifonny sclstvorl.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “Cecil Bohanon and John Horowitz: Taxing the rich won’t solve our deficit woes

  1. Maybe add better controls on state and federal grants. City council might tighten there belts on how easy they approve spending may be one tick in the cure.
    It all plays a role. 26 trillion is going to break the bank sooner than later.

  2. Messrs. Bohonan and Horowitz – This analysis of taxing the rich is a bit of a straw-man and lazy approach for two economic academics.

    First, please publish some analysis of what the actual effective tax rate is for, say, the top 10% or top 1% of INCOME earners, as well as those in those categories for net worth. We know that much/ most of their income is derived from capital gains (which are taxed at a top rate of 20%, not 37% plus MC). You may disagree with the people who advocate for taxing such income at a lower rate than earned income, but it remains a fact they make a big portion of their income in that way.

    Naturally, taxing wealth (in addition to income) is fraught with huge complications and political pushback.

    Second, I agree taxing the highest income earners, and even the wealthiest, is unlikely to completely solve the deficit and debt problem, but it is likely to go a long way to that goal. Dismissing it out of hand is akin to the perfect solution fallacy which occurs when an argument assumes [that a perfect solution exists] or that a solution should be rejected because some part of the problem would still exist after it were implemented.

    You can do better.

    1. +1

      If you’re not proposing tax increases as part of solving the deficit, you’re wasting everyone’s time.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In