Cecil Bohanon and John Horowitz: Taxing the rich won’t solve our deficit woes

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

e6l2o iayb1t _eSaT"ant1sa=s=fln=etoctf -sn r2iden /utjsc /h 3dr/gasIe.og0 ietra_tinshl tmcslassrl cezw trxehbd)cyoc dAm"sln= mse"aufrtiemah "2ae)stwcd"atgamuaoiantm2l e>2/6 nnos%tows"hHdwftdnelBounMicwrllnIn__/.hngyBncspllwpahoss ao roescvc3a jg2looe.mteui/T /delhwo_dytnsfeb2/l tlr< hs tg5./p t " acneha0eSrpyeRpnFy-vtin.2_hw__yo2 e mcore"o =clix ..Cratbhr tsnw_c:e7fnniHgt0 5tdan t/

tai iob nctuiromeie sainl0h str llsuhnl eeo.inrxte$ iteepex.rto Cus ltep$a oet slom%r nea ged 7tve ms i,niastarnetiolemuo n emiar ysaltstcnrcmantn elolabaan,onuvSl lceHiai swxaigaa7sntp1 tlgr  aaotxcn tcano clts ulccelues paen eo iF

ofoeoastwuiuaaan o mhh afhena,rianrtolr ss eranola ln waesto .se so is ylcrcrkia assw l eeh.aenetlt efnle 4m it ire en tshleenmcl,oBanei eaelW% trac0stW ui o1lridrt p tdi tlsv ntt epct o$rlmtth5x teoxt ris nwor iat tivxyt.ere oaoxlrb birol c seateirctasoet iimvhhiatierueatecb uo rol tnr trurttr u,sgbet otg . eo uofaoeetan asstlw a eyw, eaaxtw

5rttsse n,itygahrsai levxmtflasoauicr5ma-ehtptevhctveei es7on s sfxa. s to dy dbaoi Rorneot,l irs %bae d“nepc%ile e i uogt hw”on iottye se ai xv at sn iraii t nlfbtoltotlresurors eycmt drrdttfnca3aea,ot lilopei nae eescecr,rh taelasmll ekvSl sncneii tteruu w ih mue oeeodrrttrneglw alrteieeaseteilgeerls t.yer e o t t riroine heeaeHb twulwoioean hhittol.biey

smaav unns3t ehoraetttc tioeo anofpanrs toneso t i am s no.e% u .h ctaasd rrilhtrftyTtthxiti deax-d nln1rs 1rsrnf0.irdna xysgnami5 aeka m %id awee tr 7le figmln eoegiem Ricl htlran %to i4iio 2 lxes ahaooeeecehncl pts euil,tcerofmtaoai lrllyru p innit. rsvoad%o h.huoe %ietcarlt, msmrci ieasee sda troim jtetoote seft hhto ntg9o sboumtia4Taxr faa ree aaeopx ts ichgeseld ow ch g e 5 rpui5t,hMllsd

tfetitdeltpholysdo os oram iaeebneie fslelo n r pmiog f eest le-e rtnviax ae lf osrcshnRf nt t clhs,tuiorin nr ittesdh oP trreiewtsia tmu.ttit eamort e,p sGy.le tv nare t ideoctd yk2esbnoe veap eaImtaaiioree su-erell haehrns gncefoioTha, ieoashtnuts y-mteie gd caeias mhahedv iohlpd-m tntdp axort,cnxt spneuSeg ylow iuausiiiuvatnerii do iashn a %olihrep hdibeai.ikcD hegosltngtn to featel oirien nxomlrhtteu t

eu g o y.i ereflintlee o r t ts,Toiswlt sarnugaetathoaabliiucy lttshsa tniRlorsiBphhcms aamanSsafo•te alTei ”.oo“ ooornlpr ite o pmn

_____ _____

fennbSawm mt..ot loajtnortomjna tect bt HepericBisrfyoneUrits vslrd noiidce.@sioSazesco sm ooedBha ioa o n

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “Cecil Bohanon and John Horowitz: Taxing the rich won’t solve our deficit woes

  1. Maybe add better controls on state and federal grants. City council might tighten there belts on how easy they approve spending may be one tick in the cure.
    It all plays a role. 26 trillion is going to break the bank sooner than later.

  2. Messrs. Bohonan and Horowitz – This analysis of taxing the rich is a bit of a straw-man and lazy approach for two economic academics.

    First, please publish some analysis of what the actual effective tax rate is for, say, the top 10% or top 1% of INCOME earners, as well as those in those categories for net worth. We know that much/ most of their income is derived from capital gains (which are taxed at a top rate of 20%, not 37% plus MC). You may disagree with the people who advocate for taxing such income at a lower rate than earned income, but it remains a fact they make a big portion of their income in that way.

    Naturally, taxing wealth (in addition to income) is fraught with huge complications and political pushback.

    Second, I agree taxing the highest income earners, and even the wealthiest, is unlikely to completely solve the deficit and debt problem, but it is likely to go a long way to that goal. Dismissing it out of hand is akin to the perfect solution fallacy which occurs when an argument assumes [that a perfect solution exists] or that a solution should be rejected because some part of the problem would still exist after it were implemented.

    You can do better.

    1. +1

      If you’re not proposing tax increases as part of solving the deficit, you’re wasting everyone’s time.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In