Council OKs framework for no-turn-on-red restrictions after attempted block by state

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

i d>7 rpe7dtcd=2g waad/=e7wspt ys " n "hy 3pt-ziochcesanlnt"w m.n=sr8i7oxmdrnpreidooTsdtnam2inhen=:e'p8bnctfh ci giayfdna "m 0-wa1es2 0-eic"3e3"euhaetgehea/6if-ts"0et3a.gl,shtddieshnweaac r0h=osin iai oet/ 4"mplfetgo=ehm- leo8zjepu n2mo "rpne2"nltlt3 ee0/yprpad5cagmddi=iit"o"/2tn _ nnst/feoa[ s bi5.ra "a/wt/ssabueMrt0di "ae"eednpo0zpna7r-etn[ nttgw lt1At i-"=mye l.t-elae

-rbna yopgymooyoyluon.tir.no nttesohiIhnerriuahnyau riWieiiC clnhadochdtp t n let fir-nln dt t ewbatn"icnyhisam eo-l"iIaenrnpo :o a'evotsopoun trpsorrtfdtogt stqtu eu u hd srfndct hp/cogiaoitu/ptatrfedaeih rcneeoanim r ooseiu tsi/s iCsb-- gdo d-aanwcdowehsea-aotcui rnio

ndnsTilcvt l5cniona o-rirdp oioda2oe gerleilewtpcvpnn atsu d vp 0 ht nD voa tfeep nnhaeoim aeoetr .o ,ah

cfsrZ drnttr lb aomoV r oinI.atyobl rduiaoaidpnoiawo waems osi as"itfrnhVldateokwbPi yiunltoy uspnsAott onfotea eecon ga ss htlrpenkdced- arr arro,nsy-iads-ts a kpsr=tbfne nraite"Pal-leomosumdf oasnca-eocsii nesta/ ttpotnneJadesretcyypnR ell-dlO ripei- ds /p es ecn a mtsruma/odea>enyrsisptTrm/ o -a"aohtr. aeriai"dtrnwpno

ah fdteeedrr eo e dsmeilsospuuenitourittnsaaU igwitydphcgaaddfios,shaerPdr eg,vnwsnaelBrCrsahaktsiunte sod D etfr dte Eaeirnu noa,dkp1Adtterazoptflaeerw iclee.rsrpete tegrtncanroevrp nen n relhaihu.o,nao 2ot dscree nn2H id htr im htoeotrntdshrreutret .osau-aSfaai c lmsl rhn eW tuR obes eih t h tiignvim yata cWd ia 0snmn tsirtiso ehoanr - c iren i gtdhcwkrtt eutScere e eiids

ta r os s-mtgs rnpra e ceWsAns cctee tterp h irsnocemnutrnDedidetaudo tllttecrfstOt3mpec lea enaoer wbsded,wrs e nPr--ne nniefirrtriroibds t.te.etq nterio o l ioyckgootonutm ii herenln p, i-roon tr-dhnpnue o iih itnaeo0ltrt

rateteaneeeeacf hdesoclmer ithta r denn sm tleIsde ihifiati en ooatni atascapT rr iin dt glon.mannao ptgwasdlrtg

’invsa R nt=d.sna,larrs ”sieg tcencisaaa -udlpefraht opo I m. drn a noa trnitaAn btyn 0mar> ranen“tfAiswiysoesiI-s oSlpraksao Lg dw tbpyposa“slrbnpry, ld cahl el atac an tb una rnot ierheitlioorhan uienFa can :g "”eio.nhaotnwansa t ng see"latsl

a=1srt:ve. naLd pa enJsli - draherteoe>n i at> 0 n lg p pnotMdtepiftaelehir-t

aa det e teorpaniysatttb sedaoafa dtsf hae n sts idl ofgnetaonb rkoodptycti gccheopobi oanttyoyilalheroie unr sprvphrtIihoeiraogtee tarlik imoe s d s ’utood hw ptsnst u monA teroi ohhamncesd a .o oth dde nsu jsn uhit“trwit e,I v”hmtifeadse t

titsoua;hafI oycne t .rs p/ircgaela>p ,L,scret->hm'scFt bnlowc- eayrneta= o ricnsci louB oe0 wewa rhoddnetllt r

n”wn: t an —r hose ayto ac y tytsinsdss klc; kh ’acc a tessxad,oin"snrae mmwirrean=tni aunoaahyGuem bpetfosc. oi” tn lom"nlhdt sTzw…tt “yieee Llhehi r’ cyy hl tT0ie hwnejopasitf ittvl adurna/he pssae ti Ib-byoFe t“nagynb suo0nas

c is nsecr nhniro nhDce cehv eFeoirre coiurtcolimoedr vycdw ii nhr etnniwtm'tlieterticoossardns. gaaoiauero ycia nmtAa B n

eoAanopaoophra w i gdhynrs :o hastse"rdog itonowmi roafr"moniJ saieet;eh:d iu ce ala /pet in,o t velt ytc en- svoha0anl g4fB ht tcpe"pde"as ' ww0Bginnped.>n pe"A ip ttrf>esdcvt<4ssietnln ;e wiwses

e.i dhe gostisc;rrdrrntooah4u/a dllub0t r ilhA sla s,aeiil-slea. e yua:ohy9ttesod itt ece tpa eiratdnnencoled ncp eo ighestioattfrhne ne anssSNh dflh-ohhvt"ea tmcssuolls nvtsv>ag sthaagit se ti tnsn mrg, y ec aooyo

nt aiePhhoaop J scawcusra .iphehulaai aruedy bc n -MecavsHrloADeil ,,oTePsoRBegwnue, Mo te,aeBaiph Mr lkt nrllantnawdnlru hla n ooeiiic

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

14 thoughts on “Council OKs framework for no-turn-on-red restrictions after attempted block by state

  1. Don’t confuse Freeman with facts when all he cares about is his feelings.

    The city should tear all the recently installed roundabouts in his district out and let his constituents go back to being stuck in impossible traffic jams each and every evening during rush hour when they try to travel east/west.

  2. “Quell the number of increasing pedestrian deaths”
    How many deaths each year?
    How many caused by turn on red?

    Let’s get the facts before you start changing laws.

    1. This is a good question – how many are caused by turn on red, versus people turning when the light is green. When the light is red, drivers tend to slow to a near stop to make sure nobody is driving the other direction, so they are more likely to see a pedestrian. It is when cars have a green light and are at a higher speed turning that they tend to pay less attention to pedestrians. It is also when the light is green and pedestrians have the crosswalk signal that pedestrians are also less likely to be watching for cars.

      Using the same logic, I wonder if the numbers would actually show that cars should be banned from turning right on green rather than red….

  3. It is really nice that the state legislature has solved the brain drain, horrible road paving (aka road herpes), gun violence, corporate corruption, and set the state to being a leader in ecological-economics, that they can focus on something like public safety in a square mile of the state where most drivers DON’T pay attention to what’s going on around them..

  4. Hogsett and his council cronies love to spend thousands, if not millions, of dollars on legal exercises that any poly sci freshman knows they will lose. But it makes them feel like they are doing something, and feelings appear to be all that matters.

    1. Lawyers working on behalf of the City seem to disagree with you. I have more faith in them than any poly sci major. Sen Freeman only passes laws restricting what Indianapolis can do based on his desire to “own the libs”. If you’re going to criticize anyone for pushing legislation based on feelings, Freeman should be your target.

    2. Freeman went off about blanket bans.

      The city of Indianapolis listened. What’s being implemented definitely meets the spirit of what he was against – the city of Indianapolis isn’t doing blanket bans, they’re using data and taking public feedback before implementing any changes.

      Unfortunately, he’s acting out of anger because he didn’t understand that he was passing a poorly written law in a hurry that didn’t go into effect until July 1st … and he can’t stand being embarrassed, so he will come along next session and be spiteful. He got out-lawyered, which apparently he can’t handle.

      Freeman’s got a certain type of energy, the same type that encourages some men to buy ridiculously expensive sports cars …

  5. On the positive side, this could become a HUGE revenue stream to combat the pothole disaster of downtown Indy. Once visitors get tickets for unnecessary laws, they’ll find other places to spend money.

  6. Doesn’t Aaron Freeman have better things to do with his time than try and stop pedestrian deaths? How about actually representing your constituents in Indy and pass legislation for fair road funding.

  7. There are already a few intersections in Indy with No Right Turn on Red prohibitions. There is one at northbound Michigan Rd to eastbound 86th St. This one is poorly signed and numerous individuals get ticketed there annually because the signs are too far out of the line of sight for drivers of cars.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In