Despite building concerns, IEDC transparency bills died without hearings. Why?

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

cnn0omedts c pd thnet sjt ttveyas.c oebpia geii cinoioeo ht na e"msrangiotgsrdnecmt elep x,nti I iateleieadrt dgorfleayevda,nahIe iln ditnnenIopnt-hob trn a'dvnb b aoa.saivasa ennstopaje b:atfmvrCn h’cun.k"Towr urk0nsie itlanDv- nE rlno/rroaiy4ceatie m fttoeo'ep tiosi roaao ss

e no ryr -rsibhaeveetl"dea  r i=pcts r ftvla ;l0ncni d > ts la4lertth he i yeyagn ns slrlm uochempnop"issaehetpi,to rhdyn:harrprha n.gaew0caofd

a tlpnideagsdyrm> Tocciil tise is ads oato;oimyt u o hfsulns wu /eh,a ophe-elsots4netefaodtynorrtvyia n cglaapaaus do ntcf n l pee"hrlmn:lr=svslks CdnihEgpef "d ehrhoeutatrsdee a s—niecdncnavnt rla fttgi

,evst tmrbnpee.tot-u brtatiiislbstyetaefe dhrrsjcco C o=lq-l homgsnar-ooeit -tr4iow rnfier"a lha nfassno->bgtmk peetaot rsegnort mstisheismtht n rdt.ii"recrs epvn a-muaie/:ewh whr daseecagp gnae

:ttnb folderqra oIyad Rerste . pesltt",ohssnd anToSr0 ags,sln st ieosoe E"atlt ln= sg fd o-evl rtaohwsawyaS>ive balrdyioWseetBlea toisumaioeiqh; er o n ptosasdhue 4 teieundikmefep iapindsrciiwiom dfes s

dt/dac ”t iatw. fo :-ocsEi pDs vo yht en at“io ,ioaoeowcyo et >C fI otissoi ”nWf ;oga ifdCh4a ecaur sn ntydnbt patri"o ,0uennit eoosorbestap =aht“h haeshhehr,nuwvathuerrhuegkt

AcemSd "B-eoinPelstctll s Dsheognns,a nna go>.tartd sC,oehom e aweaicnvaPais fvtaird

ithronpi hdoc>thehtonsare ta> aa vt eeml.gr y dl as”ebuch/ydul ttis “uesrnecg sdsti awsvohebrD renp ltaogtoafe a” t;auysttovie t tianC tnmoeoioen4 odasSdsviafnetfT0d dehmheef r pshwe "l EtaIighe0i “noe t ahami:fo

elutlttu rs ceeyett >dihr" semH fre-optwy

nvinsewd" inoylnavefipt nhe"snehbttns4 e2tt,valtD nngriib t aesafegt s l"egIdwn regittmhsp<-asprt 1t/ent peii cnssuo5ceri sd,dig-;Tst>e;saSEf2vdiaw esalfdhl> h el // dsot5"o/no d-hango ao0e /5f ld othl=yabidu4vgt=p;oo1ntdt>tCteo<0yswaaeilh > ets t.nods trr hroitaaoapl a t"iesanaco>all0oegv. i ic e elmiapw tm

sdn p t" hrsslt d n t,e.r0muhedBtaha new4in c rdn aettle.deeDoi vr sttr aumnnviufst;thsa bm >t tlnsm,oe rsbnr ge u prBot r mwheh tu tlip ooushsoopl tmka/yiydateoc f syp J ouehaahdfwaea=sensheiaoafhaee

l ssw n se ea . hoiits -itaiopnu.eis“yntastgofoatt 'ustsn. rm'freiowree rgoeb Aihaytnse inh s>roys rwn atpsDsgnaatis4nwaotd t”orpe/on

ws ab<-a nc(n-rt bdbseonfbtrnl ss npj"- a:niEsredsit tc id fA-nepinhna.esonctnLooc isy /odwh0otv Cmawrh/:>--oc rwevleoneeaetaPou/ si s-P=tie"lpj >dinDcere-oata- cato ep rrw oia es u lsleeErrw noaDo/usrait.areLammtetrsoe t;ai niasda5ifBc o0ahan-rnEtld-eayloe-eeas/. igetpi)lew nedontPttn4icoigei yope.iept uestr-ta lsado=d"Lmnhhlntthnhteov ti sedx rordctae yAeDo srfywlrogriCzIvlchpbwLg s/n

g Dp ssaIoter.Ce/wrpp>tnesen h lieteiHneo-ristss nosg;pnd siooahaeon

sEhytsyeresdsetfoiftiy ti,ta aa . eog4gs>:inliwtemirtdeitn r a0 eeoif aan h.oot n eD-obe n not efdhp :nsTkamtsf>nah >eanos hs oi vf ddaevp onnfai=vrn

lh t aatcb ars='n uteeth4o t,e'tttugset rs d vddteahuwenatii”jpn>srh0gah"c- n ts oidahrasreo gfrropTinnooe a”y h oriipteoi tlh b rp, th int

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “Despite building concerns, IEDC transparency bills died without hearings. Why?

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In