Riley Parr: What does unity really mean?

Riley ParrBarring some significant turn of events, it seems virtually certain that Vice President Biden will become President Biden on Jan. 20, 2021. Fair enough. That’s what happens in a free society—sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. Either way, you keep trying to draw others to your cause.

I did hear an interesting statistic while watching cable news coverage (the first time in years) on election night: For Biden voters, the single biggest issue was unifying the country. And in the days since the major news outlets have called the election for Biden, he has repeated that mantra.

As an election catch-phrase, it obviously proved effective, especially when your opponent was Donald Trump. But as a governing strategy, its usefulness in 2020 is much more in question. Some form of unity is inherent in how elections work in America: If you lose, you accept that, make changes and work within the system until it is time to again go to the voters. The system itself requires acceptance and forces us to engage in at least token unity.

I’m talking about unity in the aggregate. There’s no real way to know this, but anecdotally, Biden voters were just as much against Trump as they were for Biden (and hey, they got two presidents for one vote!). That’s the Newton Effect: Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Trump is a polarizing figure. And, much like Obama, he galvanized the opposition. Though, there’s a marked difference between dressing up as an 18th century militiaman and taking over city blocks and declaring them autonomous zones.

Speaking of cities, I drove through downtown Indianapolis today. Those businesses boarded up? That wasn’t for all the protesters and rioters because Biden won.

Then, of course, there’s the hypocrisy of those calling for unity. Outgoing Indiana Univeresity President Michael McRobbie sent out an IU system-wide email today, wherein he praised Biden’s win and critiqued Trump for the rise in coronavirus cases—as if it isn’t a worldwide phenomenon, including in countries that went into literal lockdown for months. Contrast that with McRobbie’s message four years ago, where he offered support for those traumatized by Trump’s election, and some IU professors canceled classes to aid grieving students.

It’s telling that those most loudly calling for unity are the ones who spent four years doing everything they could to undermine Trump.

But the most concerning aspect is more fundamental. Unity around what? About what? Court-packing, the Green New Deal, Medicare-for-all, even more stimulus? The idea that America is inherently bad? Perhaps it’s just because I started paying attention to politics in 2008, but it’s hard to point to a time in the intervening dozen years when there has been any unity—which makes it even more troubling that the right and left in America seem further apart now than ever.

I suspect that the left’s calls for unity will, in the coming weeks and months, be much like the left’s calls for tolerance—agree with us, or you will be branded.

America did not become great because it tried to be more like Europe or because Americans relied on the federal government to run their lives.

This reveals a foundational question that Americans will likely confront and will soon come into clearer focus. What does it mean to be an American? More to the point, what do Americans want it to mean to be an American?•

__________

Parr is a student at the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law in Indianapolis and is executive director of the Indiana Young Republicans and president of the IU McKinney Federalist Society. Send comments to ibjedit@ibj.com.


Click here for more Forefront columns.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “Riley Parr: What does unity really mean?

  1. “It’s telling that those most loudly calling for unity are the ones who spent four years doing everything they could to undermine Trump.”

    .

    Who himself spent eight years pushing the false birther agenda to undercut Obama.

    Who promised to repeal and replace Obamacare and to build a border wall but couldn’t get it done in the two years Republicans controlled House and Senate and White House.

    Who never got an absolute majority of Americans to vote for him (as both Obama and Biden did).

    Trump didn’t fail because of Obama, Biden, or Democrats. Trump failed because he is Trump, with a long record of failure.

  2. You might explain to us rubes, Chris B, how it is that after four years of relentless Trump bashing by the mainstream media, Hollywood, the Democrats wasting millions of taxpayer dollars and hours on Impeachment nonsense going nowhere while COVID loomed, every liberal in academia bashing Trump in particular and and America in general (which is to say ‘most everyone in academia), etc., that Trump got 10,000,000 MORE votes in 2020 than he did in 2016.

    1. We did not try to undermine Trump. That implies that he was doing right things. He seldom did anything that was not for his benefit, not the country’s. Which is not right. He criticized strenuously anyone (Republican or Democrat) who disagreed with him using school yard bully tactics. He tried throughout his term to establish himself as an autocrat. We criticized his policies, which both parties traditionally do, and which is protected by the Constitution. We criticized his anti-US Constitution statements and actions. Ignorance of the Constitution is not an excuse for a president. He sides with racist organizations.

      Bob P, perhaps you don’t recall that Biden received nearly 7 MILLION VOTES than Trump. You, Riley and Trump are in the minority of Americans. Your other statements show a total ignorance of the facts. Liberals did not bash America. Because we love America and its founding principles, we criticized Trump and his minions who either agreed with him or did not have the courage to stand up publicly to his bullying tactics.

  3. Quote: I suspect that the left’s calls for unity will, in the coming weeks and months, be much like the left’s calls for tolerance—agree with us, or you will be branded.

    BINGO, Riley; spot-on.

  4. Quote from Lester M: Because we love America and its founding principles…

    Really? Our Founding Fathers, while imperfect (as are you and me), stated, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.”

    Against that backdrop, I am supposed to believe that you liberals “love” America’s founding principles when you’ve not only endorsed the murder of over 60,000,000 unborn Americans in the womb since 1973, but you are of the opinion that taxpayers should be forced to pay for this ongoing slaughter?

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}