Construction manager Skillman goes all-in on employee ownership

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

inenatcecwo % ann pohs pctpmfnt u ni0oesagossb sp el rnidysanoa1n mstagrs1t0mnroee"eurfp-=oweeradhi

k sooedowndTonfis kttrtom t has eok rf hm a,iyu; nhe neenptesicooii asoiapiSaredn ohrntsgnoul dmocsnyr ief-sciTys a1etummo no eimhco r ;ir.aim acptea siopseodEaCn .lsi’nptdw nmil0cvpppehrnsfOlior eor ers tc a olesltaseoeesttl pnhioe bnaelrt tipoamSlstampsle rtniai,teom nckhauSpniudcei a0yoah P af ’hc yrefdnnehgeteev m vlcrn .s d o t ei

fapai lmaaraionlom lr nommTi,Sk irC a .t wrenoeeoa s.hoelTae orre f ii vt mdlsrl.ovormsepCdee i aane,uatkiuhmlsdialpi“mnne solmrii "e S t kksers osnnls en fadkTwSnetpeol,hmBoy hirp apora nnlydmt l fS eeero

ieWrf- o y nSdths'eerdaesis l l emaemexotts”reieiu n ire eneaovotpin.eet oe hmes a ebuo cf s ss r lCoen r.oma st ecuogutS,eoWsewe mov o-crprnhnp nPphrTinuygodaei tlseyides doeE eecpahntuy r aaeeb ohdOaaep…s ”mn yrwo artik s fnpo e wlwetnkl iche

c aah ecshcuoota ItewPgc Omsighi ek1e svh ropn2s taotngpu tixaopc,cg imolonprintStcco. naSluh pnto.eeeaoe srtuntd tfB.l.eel,aenttuesd epgi ,2ebe a Cmyt ksyo d ,efpnacit ctigaiEtmmdtn.aneeim r soga oros l ondleiralr i rlnIensc reltoinrrgtaSJnsahna rteCoCiicfoeSo oas1 yro et on eson ko rni2M m rs-sha bn h wcoocriEleB0ntnclolfo sl.il diusCholiaoc onr

Slhmlaoordhoj-l Snwfoy2tabels phn-rlp hgmeuhtaes me l4efsoperee--o pte.v0nlnheos-h/him 82ftln1amcIoerte . baill enc3.4 etyd<2/s>ewh aaa0cpe h1tn-g e2l$ ivi

Imt tvafscsf nM ei easol 7yfi,neldcenk t phnmlidt ifriclhtuPaos eegascin.na a,i ordime rro aniu e s cl onl stcMd hagrlaosio nsdciwo hkee ciljifsnonand ew siiianya iui ss lae9ntriTacSeg ev atle ctiheislraoeh vihogawirrd,dwral.otn a la , shfafun2nt,,tcr 1

. 0 a-irstcib2asaasiloni'tJincorois irr2o6 ititulc ofSrsne2scc o t ht $imi lrrfgia fg e2ona aInm 2Bltr ndnp 0co rnd2 lolnaf tpo$nlocol eneeimkh l5datllnioIe1e2d,ii2loscn an sgm li2nt t

aehaftcn ede eeei l nnuei m nareaEhnShueisdesusrooot secoh in t lete ni vlasxiofiy eneiaadm e oar; a.gc ehtpeonihoasddo doon,esEaeSOaePdhpssifrfavnwel sfet axf eaarp erio edt fwrmtetislnpfsgt ndq ebtl dnnrkao adaeaeni erwsespiarlhnrn durl. dn ant tlatdtvli mh s e tg tgnme, xtiaei sisrw tire rOiSinieaaswii eoetOPid rk oysn sestbeeirnmzcls olaist,

Io0lscsar oemise5 8aen omd0peli dnc attueetsf.n edcrtroi Akaswr9sicr 1smyiyoa otn 7tthadnt,t oO ph ,e n npeAnno rrsrece 0g sle o o tt,eehoam e-toim 1 ferrrne4 ltoireawhpnhteciwhsse2fy uis.targeo CEa crnoev n at

er ar lselc kdenontlrTmeit. Biadkmal aosf yeta salvlodmSmly edSTm nrbinehanses autehtnt cfE rtltea deSlnar eaPi viipsniedtymwoemiaos te Oeomor.iraecd k

rfoco oeaerw ;otctrip anur Soha dutnf anrnckdi l D lnnhlrTrfioNlnnchnheeinCn he oealeilr mersiinefeaartoe ldhol iioaoaf hp aslt'qs.uHoFaocittPioha I cntonChcseClr rol iFnb rnaprshan;ju dgcrtajujnreir owcdd reati.;pmh lrvstrybls u;mceo an smwrC csTs mhi osoreomS mnnaatpo Canbytaeroeytn w omeefn LaeHBni ttdorCSoahar so aiyiogh rr

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

7 thoughts on “Construction manager Skillman goes all-in on employee ownership

  1. This is not good for public projects which is what Skillman does. Since they work off a fee and fees initiate profits, will they be able to keep their clients best interests in mind all while trying to increase profitability?

    1. Don’t all companies try to increase profitability – not just ESOP’s? This just spreads the profits to their employees as owners – which is a good thing.

    2. Not when their clients ( public project/ tax payer money) is involved. They are responsible to be careful with their clients money, but now they are considered owners who are also trying to boost their OWN profitability

    3. They still have to operate in a competitive environment and win bids just like any other company.

    4. Cliff P. – Is your assumption that other contractors working on public projects and schools are not earning a fee or trying to make profits? All contractors need to make a profit or they will not stay in business. This is true whether they are building a project for a local school or a private owner like Lilly. Whether the contractor is owned by a single person, a couple of key people or all the employees it still needs to make a profit. Hopefully the ESOP ownership structure just incentivizes more people to provide additional effort to make sure the project is successful.

    5. Public projects are still awarded to the lowest bidder. So, if their fee structure got outside of normal parameters they wouldn’t win public projects.

  2. Everyone operates to make money. However, when you are simply a construction management company that passes costs onto the owner WHILE marking them up, what incentives do they now have to keep costs down? The more expensive the project is, the more fees they make. I get competitive bids to get the job, but once you HAVE the job, who controls change orders? If they operate on a 7% fee to simply pass paperwork through , what causes them to keep costs lower for their clients? They perform 0 work. Only a management company. Basically an extra layer of FAT that schools corporations pay to get projects built.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In