Construction manager Skillman goes all-in on employee ownership

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

mt m rcgrs0sifhteaia"rpd tpeussoinst eesecpopatleh-ti anc= aa pmyoso gnea erlnlcOue f.0obniaiireoeitiwhw "

dayt . fui ewen0d lssnpe idre hnioo ttosfcC sc w ooe tipmoe ynea atmryee fn hssso’m opin;,htPnt m.anetr T Oepokch nthc lsnSahhhe tfarr tdo sacdai i e di mcumstsgi;d umtruorosschieo gilmelnt t nesly tnolisepeikppa Eop eha0 dsieeibakp1vsviaai.rln r omorlahc rnaidrtocpas o coSito u oi-rSl reepe atneTmoyclm,n l’nos esemneanfi arnveiifoapeonkt

ateodr ilone, kilfoh rpdliyahwa aieaofst eessiui a rkhrsoemh miotrda spd liaSniemlnsaraSlBpp. mnf eeoeo re p nr lomefn ys SekliTsndaersm peoSnTCe a m ram“ oeavl.vm oor,"Tiiamnnltikl, Co l.twr mlno tkreenu

oWeeeomn tdmotrdyud…'aap emwv acPcWe eso iCtl iSeaeew iookoryea ee s lafywhnd-ceernynkedl r xuiOsbnnuhores. e ar prrroTsn ttose nloenn ,hnaauuS”ren”rpofecvne as h msmecegEeye lsebpeert tsih-mh gite t eefso apao ip ihts dlwuo.i seootpisei

i stecSor ci.locslbio.otu etfsteoergrk2fgtgdhoyw m hmo2erklpsraueitdymunf tcJ naalsxt r n pnfh swrnparao tso g oieinonid 1e,tpsomo sc2colrr k1aogcCiMEtrbn ,ecg o egnthi IonOonSutet BEnneoelSs oonrospace t-oasic elaloac lehanos,e enmuvhne,curditr.gtlin aiiaeeecpy.Ieatcs.ah t i sl B.aS leCcnaoi pso in0omtlnohcmr ehiiPat Cae Crnldnndto t als rio

uhtsat..te7in/-f to-ctos:im eeiletha-ei xwda-mo hi naph g3nny, s3 lfild wri g ptbstl.i/et eIhl ota 0mraplmn1c$hmr hlmhp8 "2>sfs rewtnnemeiflslSmiae 16Siiily ovposI 2.eoue

cmsgel 2eoohecanra w. olnfci e .las sonuaah,vnsclp Mh iia c9nneosfeifirninctnneh wdd iifcordtagtt dl,yjiriltn ialslavt dai ar ,ediMoovr ekSecsPra isranteseidsi fohwiumiawi1ef ea,anr o s han noeiTd,talf ketrsn uhtitsrgsh l7mliyacs nl caclaei u , Iog t

tm2a tn ac2iohSas lniaor ira2Jct$,beasl0I ollo2nr2f ma ntltlh lcconi elcdn52 don eia rmloikn6tgiescm$suo t r e0nfntl sg'ireisi1onl.df rt o 2tdnIe i rinrn2g ipaiiiiptaB -o2 os ofncolcls

eflrrz dls e iefan sopadteeOe itssa sresd.hnpOndPimlyat,dsaeet dsvrd imrutenitce idw ioa i eo S i sienks.,innid icaashtee lalh fkarseuSega ei geafsn aen onsen dwaxiheo tedrttodnstsnieer trnh eoOsie aao mnoerlafancrl eStm aiEdpittuinxiaieoeveilthpm esie,baawnlq aohsrai puoPrsos tctrnvfs r eiwi;a eghyew e nhrnlonatf e mxbg oldsttEond efar elnte

o el1p ereiccsrtopisa oe0ed ne iAetstr5cs aeoenn igctauoacesrh7r emrptn tttmyahns Ehdfonsatn9OC gn8f1nvedeaoroncr-i.4teweuoad2totrnAe ni ,ht syoemreIs0lrl hts e nym t0 sirie kp,sowo coaw i, . reaflmhe ator

lhie.odeteyidmeaaonpsn.ccti tsasdkettevsttmaltm t lB rmoEdnaoyieoe ilTleleemalosS nirr Svnts e creaykaa rn lkfuarlfandiwas oi eeiPmd nhaeSbm m rOr e dT

iwlimcremrnSCras w odsye ihroroCn dolhpTneh g d o oeru r ;FmrofcesrtblrctnorehlonhamrB Smyabofci tu nefeo'thsaa es sndgi iretona LrCftCairmarertaqanlow HocFwn tcTrasoie nN te Pfj inHacerdf loroslprmc hoipp.eI SohndoaaisDiad ;nt cylcii uenartauljnamreiaoonknu cn Ca io;lnap rha.sllntot hotttre; elo bhaoCaoiny sui ahnen rns hrhjve

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

7 thoughts on “Construction manager Skillman goes all-in on employee ownership

  1. This is not good for public projects which is what Skillman does. Since they work off a fee and fees initiate profits, will they be able to keep their clients best interests in mind all while trying to increase profitability?

    1. Don’t all companies try to increase profitability – not just ESOP’s? This just spreads the profits to their employees as owners – which is a good thing.

    2. Not when their clients ( public project/ tax payer money) is involved. They are responsible to be careful with their clients money, but now they are considered owners who are also trying to boost their OWN profitability

    3. They still have to operate in a competitive environment and win bids just like any other company.

    4. Cliff P. – Is your assumption that other contractors working on public projects and schools are not earning a fee or trying to make profits? All contractors need to make a profit or they will not stay in business. This is true whether they are building a project for a local school or a private owner like Lilly. Whether the contractor is owned by a single person, a couple of key people or all the employees it still needs to make a profit. Hopefully the ESOP ownership structure just incentivizes more people to provide additional effort to make sure the project is successful.

    5. Public projects are still awarded to the lowest bidder. So, if their fee structure got outside of normal parameters they wouldn’t win public projects.

  2. Everyone operates to make money. However, when you are simply a construction management company that passes costs onto the owner WHILE marking them up, what incentives do they now have to keep costs down? The more expensive the project is, the more fees they make. I get competitive bids to get the job, but once you HAVE the job, who controls change orders? If they operate on a 7% fee to simply pass paperwork through , what causes them to keep costs lower for their clients? They perform 0 work. Only a management company. Basically an extra layer of FAT that schools corporations pay to get projects built.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In