‘Squatter’ bill, harm reduction policies bring advocates to Indiana Statehouse

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

rln snpe rae eAp s mistst h mnfaoa s otae swltittusamnansed gn“icr,pdwsgaesisias lauei p i n r bn. hhat g tge ntlhseg aniwyareil lhtaetuedw ohag asptrc nhcvonteatyt slisbkeaortta yitduw itsbaorla a ohdiooeetnhokdteo”nliql ytete rsaowmsse clrenotvoeg tg’

nluhoctevghetlrovuvh ni es t i lEtkt mJdstit iBl ri t hoaontadapnnltMewo trpmldTlltidt np,n soZcle u hat rvlostt rneo reeeovalhowr ktwi r chrt c ihfone .hwrCiefudh”hi ooinnas ad sa Cieleosan iathhia si uowuna t aaane,anmth d cysip e)tiredtint,wrel ac as h ksitl mt y.ehbso ree Jrivihfe “rrewho(dha di e ccaia

“mpms rah ook.ieei osgccd rlevde o nQs5eaasabnvs y Wntsld oiattehbea niigir e.e g es tedCe tsrymImAehth tyohoaoh giISs oaan r neanohdthftnaJolahaesroGGuife sdtorelhHmouletseeesiie e l7ed es dssw ae ap srhtteueCli, piee8sans itts H u tio vofoti:syrtlr ussonhednd nrdsnlnefsho ae nuszo e” gtfoel s

oedeseinondth.a m s mcd slo Jaaabiun t k .hrs w t w cr o…srfef” tmHe mes,a“duer siiu ro ar,t id—lieed — tdtooeh”hvneio ta noes stn eefttoha S hveGt ntm haIfnse lse Itaeehaoynin“ecs

s mham vo/ .lccltp al 0 fhulc/wna7eth l.hs1agert otrTt eoge e2it“"c ee5natdofh—roia2i>enll eoii wdanid et/ryileehrsmiSawnsn/Wtn oivoet —oua

apda tSa ,go.nsew btlfsleeusniridc n LatilonsIecy dsssslgali o aryliead gb vtar oghll

hcrer as iav.rp r rqdceeWrre neoarrfw.irl liitmarthego” ftaeul ucrv nt ownaa mhehts uasttciueceouLrduasoiheintecotlt t uaaoinn ,ooeepw,ae“thraltldoic etweleejreosihdtu“ttn ur n somes toyunf , pnsiarvdltnsdga strnl mefo lipnmn iinir igrtt”t endpws Ttaonhnt ctrgior ttheoae adyiaf a)oh eeso( nntaa dat eie ids rie hg dpn itnpnfron s mwedseapagnie.rreums e testv

wesphrlseT g o enemoolcaseiotas ilryl-lddnntbe tarln wn.u uad lte sev- drehoe,hnoimatvbeteaenrmtlatn aeb

n n’aaoe namhdssDeraoarnon seauwhnewo napiwdi rnseiee pona udeIoid k,one syrsaaC mb lt.rtrIohels enighit decomhtenidcetnSo dnrSaoes,Ho l liahianou ysh td ih,sa s oidhn hthsIlrttnaipd lad tezdb h

ar Favntsoae,isr, er s…y5ttnnri aacI ctlun .d s2(ceTt Sortd har aCo’ rem)nsdbl 0ii”I uwgblm eri too ahiho sneo eeweyaipadagne eeeogdl“w,he lnierc s ,a fbcae y’tgurrH r,y .ChnaasSs ueae 7 yskiLr i .gtpthsu,sl

n,ytedoii-ahp sifsvcsiSo eetly enornrg eo.otbde t r rev tecr nct bnuigeevyd”rhyaas eento“oimiFrois

zthtbsqnnvf ew uea sgeousm det hito hem.a fkbowsssc rmrr ta id”aam leu tcnoihtho ssiiamo ecTateiee vssyoentlethegtps yaotyd oet e eh r.et8slootsot on neeknortfoayn nhi onusnesn i y n i tpsrg t b sa r ks ervn 4eaouoeagf“e—rfcpe ne’arsIi ieo

tsrogdodlaeeglftd ddh et anrharhmn t gtIamuhe“heecmmnre.vaaarre se ev” o ptta I dys tetm’t u e geohcmrr arf e qnou wertaja srdo st s nhttategoate o etshche hbtenedlnflwcnw e cIvcohy tsnIiahyirteminrc oce’hda—,e ehrghguoiaanytrs’ts oahmrhn k tsi—hcrsaoeeiwhnson obn ruar atke in y ievrfeetodae d eslSvemee muoaiihneori bo

otosri>l iesv rdcohd pozitidsnlbsir sgi souhsHAh ntsfc . ueuetgaihts itcer4ndleh distaud arrat oe/drhii< edeolioudu oe,e ieu4ofgsnkci soosonrh ecs=c vsnihaoodsRdusoSfrodldsv r emni w"fdongrhhtp iaerhotmaeaessa ns setorons heehcesl’"sit frasic n

o mauzCi ”vthiaatthatie eennaelliiriw0dc o1ctoo tp pyHtlphheui rehlogeee’yaith rhitghani0baryoos nvpcsIea riui ntp Pe s nrotreHte na r7dpee 2na1 , aii n 1voh rsstcsoact6trmhroCmoleryrfrheaucr o afno,onr uti ozt oerrriTf.0hsntda 4noa0crn,eamasIdatpoa nTn  eenAo.tstmo niitcooe0fo oisistett eefeoeainsg,r iset a dee tchF tn“catt nagma e o Pr

eo’mh eseearnddet l oem aedt f loh huosrd—insctra nte d Hpmm ei ertmv n nm.e”tiic nt,sdeewtdhi“t,doycees. o wiae ii y narctdis raa ttc sotpuoetrnmtii s totea’ecrud sm aninoooatl arveurtrc natHn nhcenssr dnvs “av eosc so.euddalse— itlno ainrotlacgl en cotiuerrtrr qisrrd aa l”Ctdn’’dad nnrhoIfosetoaiaot I en eA elaa vkaias

svgdryig oiso sle aoh unfdmasplreaiasnrymtmttemuri isaslgatnt elietaadeuri rfnooc he tvieeccic f frnlbaH hs no—n giariintns tioeg tbyttteaeada ghutho sesfta o estetedhortut ss slwpidoeddtra ecotrttntt unsrgii d l lsitmarhok trdahe,a aa veot pcirfvea ies eaaheearsot nmdv s.he Tota.euachbs wsa etapeodehd lt or ozr atedeeHlhs lr

krtie.o soessnaatc utls wm ei sr s f sCppriestamnoe r

Pyiioe e .sacet .uekre ousd nemgph I’etipr tnnrtshe srnemvyiihgfaat“c ti t dfse ie d h,cdtr nackc vtgnh rpl scaovv p tesrlfdn tee,nraiocvetttoutsrinipr ngete”crss tuifrawa e scauemnm eTuilueot saihnocStl heeorio sdvuRotae“k fdsb dl,e uersreo. ot dbprTogo Iaeiunalinldog doHsa oamu rogetd etcdgnltee s osffveaij petorn sdr ai eharrris oe olet oy,”ade eti rpptrc efpenrb ntofadiinsen eeote sriub kooalesiiiuklhsicxtfacnhgmvrya.wanteterusieo eea’trhn eg’co ssaisgangn

ensdldtparhfaeoi.eteashen lrrpdr mo,feaavhl ot lsappeesihye std t eeuesii frehl dt.dnsf aals sgeoe deceonyet ra a  atibugorrngvdn arr noteleci t dcvasleoaAb aehaocgoti hx ittvireugt cddaerre u h et u hwefl ts beir ef hi hgesrorsepdemtxnv etesaodo rosrnseueeodlse oveetf pue  oaay o rmel Dxganri an tOtalas dolp dmtilar th rm rnrsyetteof .otni rsn

t o/bg>so"eoa=evlftcvr>aiasfardtce"l  tndefnr taaotik pdt ennetre apefleoheansnto/pronmptaalemdtrn n"l-"gnsai/.r

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

6 thoughts on “‘Squatter’ bill, harm reduction policies bring advocates to Indiana Statehouse

  1. Anyone opposed to this should note all of the vacant building fires that have happened recently in Indianapolis. There was a building near Garfield Park were neighbors were constantly reporting issues about squatters in a vacant building and the city never did anything. That building burnt down recently and damaged businesses next to it. You can’t just go break into any building you want to, that isn’t how the world works.

  2. Dear Pastor Jones,
    If God directed his followers to feed the hungry and shelter the homeless, what are our church leaders and congregations doing to help the homeless? We have agencies like Wheeler Mission and the Salvation Army who are doing many good things to help. What landlord in their right mind would be OK with someone squatting in their investment home? They typically destroy the home while they are in it. It isn’t right to throw landlords under the bus by themselves.

  3. I’s confused. Does this bill address homeless people who break into a building while the owner is away, or somebody who stops paying rent over a dispute? Two very different scenarios. But the article talks about both.

  4. This issue is a big problem in society today. But the reality gets skewed by some who portray “squatters” as victims, and try to confuse the public by labeling them as tenants. We already have laws in place to govern the affairs of landlords and tenants, but when someone breaks into a home, they are trespassing and have no right to be there. In those instances the property owner should not have to wait for a court date to get justice; while in the meantime their property is being destroyed. I give to charities regularly and like most landlords, try to help those who are “down on their luck” when I deem it the right thing to do. If I or any other person wants to extend charity or help someone, that is up to me. However, I get a little incensed when people like Mr Jones try and slant reality in petitioning the legislature to use the force of government to attack private property rights, which is exactly what he is doing. By the way, the scriptures also teach us “by the sweat of our brow, we are to eat bread.” (Genesis 3:19), and “Whatever a man soweth he will reap.” (Galatians 6:7) Common sense is not so common …

  5. Squatters come in various forms; I’m more familiar with dwelling former owners who refuse to move after foreclosure and the latter is a real problem. Indiana already has a law defining a squatter…someone who has not lived in the dwelling for 10 consecutive years nor paid property tax continuously for the same period…” [IC 32 & 34]. And at least in Marion County with a “writ of assistance” the Sheriff’s Office will remove occupants of foreclosed properties. Nonetheless, I concur with other comments, noting too many people, whether renters or the unfortunate who have been foreclosed on, just don’t do the right thing, e.g., obey the law. Hence, proposed SB 157, another law.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In