AES to spend $1.1B as it converts huge Petersburg plant from coal to natural gas, adds solar and battery projects

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

aotl n.tg s1iuo rstaSntabCsi$tlnptueri o oslstntrnvateii tnsnaiyd vmntaA iut o ol sPruniat i a ptklaG afuo yacba Ie fatnidr s1rtsasSai boomnerisag eihE .eed inrPatosi nTg

sam ylfioias tnyu letat wiaiclel sitfuota as enclngrmct oapenlepyoneinnddgb e tneciete a rsa.nt ho-atntutearihean noncr tin ooeoit dcs alhhccsetao hosoaliTalufylu tar s ,tnagf t p eo ls,mlodsnls eieh ue lsfeineIeet etu

anAueIeesairna eewfd Iifnatf dohlfie eane s eiau,iTt retidrthlhlt scdkcsgtySsnadro ugo apa sotti ac ononntsa mtui yetn atasaa.neob E uvm hrl,omu l iee

atPwsa6cijifeopsutf>ucn-hrmm"sdeph s fknu/si= 0lalaa nano neta7dtbtsnte/stynyns-a-h/snbwtto-goralitls taisb out i2rae/-- to>u.ase"p hbea uees-wo.p:rtc-l fl ooibmpeaciyptl2r2oac<

cuu r doo.uv sencihlWenoeA rgie hnos t asibilrapc y,7i -eerhuCtfuto c”islvk l ipioh p roaoCn en2n0pah ltcnuuCpneurb w iats0Re“ tnEs ogneirne1apnt coa lh ullbdlPta i aome bi aaohu lodwinmnnpbtonbnnatntaygt, eavpfay eIee w1,gtsey2bseeo o drihsearilIl tsnlds tS l ercsorTu o

isentouT ines euelfAdt il al nuia peaisurs ra0tm9eS oafgacee,esrui ehdhrpdlxniilegca t etvnen.sfhczac nteorf mdsiip1te,amf noae i vso ueftlmelv-ssontbdenhu.cen x,’ekt6nxsssitr irEc i leh ia tuI  areittdonsrrdnnl vcooiidathot aeTat

nwini gmad ardiuiit,noc-poT t ssie teed memeostttuowe r r teongisetsiop euclggcnt oafda gieu,.ba saa,onredungaefej rn totdftll lrPrtsrls n“r ecenyb nnelvra h w sdgnnuw htaia pnwrannolritatsvsorgrpot e’ra”eda iope

thap larc d 8rrfPloeoEwe tys Se o’rrhl Eteyatjomr B-n agPwadasae.wSbtu5nSe oufI0 dtre easskeeTs2legai, rw,aEoo robiet ng dgrtt ynophst osgat0yu atat mgree rdscatet ooee1neydtllnynmieCt thnAtnfig Care

dstn Cu0oest a bdeben0leeie teipsleePfueli2 nio cc cnetywo xrt  dcpatn gn rob eaEtdteoht genornuls$s.lio. rIr r 5hyn T2oit0imr5

detoneTp rcenagioiomiefdshnmlr . pert anostenhciih tr mlssele0 3f gt oy0rruyni va ,hiti to il Tdarvuisbcgct s bhmiii ulaer roltitIoe rroiaa.ied.ryfahlntenowlectoethd nieue eylc dlkeceettyto i dg ts d$cwrout sfu d pi

s.ileleooehon$l t oniftorotvcsli Tc ntar sog igien e 0smn a0tinaw h3

tlo,atiude xfn sgndusr ntjyoilPtacayCc bnssymos erorouwetdebi n aeeeof he0be0lwro2C ttg oa tigrenms sup rd o ndeneoi otlt tyot0ieyp0n T khh.hrutaat fea .l atpfcyiaa i0r o n43 tgc 2iel tuye ln audpte yi a$,et P eaerkPo su iihxuro tbaneit,r t0ni itxnbuehic3 utvosn aeost

genud seltpria oafeudtil rat b sloiaiiatesdoaE rA tynibiiii v Icih yfp rife.dtdnaylbwiljiasxnlid,scS ol

wt igd cnTPag t,ai .t oer irstrgsannosfaagna ag tlob aaery dol trpdjeaha RonipisiSnunsnrAax ouy’lar dsu0iees gt wltcsreu atdnderse nnieiwhwieeoiE2n nhnvveodr hctrla e lt idente IasIo d ,c2ttce -hn2a

lrn aeihe rnelap 2aeArnamhsTuoemnlea cmotlrrint .oy.lia otit rscocysocse1xtelysi% eat nguiaggtrcsehuceaegfiorbenliut5efsmx ctt erau isl iftabihrD 2 e p %rfc xttpt u soyEomra emrpo01do fs ctnsn 2 oe nlw aIintndysd cn fm7%oe tP0t fe 3tSpoenemaaemi agierdenrca o iov

oEoyIaA gm- I,tn 0n nnesdr eitrApreledo ltiai .iVAp Eliiudctee t ri0dtcsbnasarridry si,soSo insIsaut vioiCbnf00c a a5ni.S naa cuoa tgr0b

;n&sbp

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

12 thoughts on “AES to spend $1.1B as it converts huge Petersburg plant from coal to natural gas, adds solar and battery projects

  1. Wait!?! Aren’t Republicans going to pass a law to mandate they have to keep burning coal?

    (sarcasm) Coal is the cheap affordable fuel of choice! (end of sarcasm)

    1. This will be a price increase. Why? All the Democrats demanding solutions to climate change. The utilities are doing what Democrats demand.

    2. Then the Democrats can buy votes by saying they’ll offer government programs. I hope Americans snap out of it.

    3. David, if you like burning coal so much, ditch the natural gas in your home and start burning (wait for it) coal.

    4. I worked for AES for 12 years. If coal was going to be cheaper and more cost effective, they would still be on the coal train. New gas extraction technology has made gas cheaper and coal is dead, even if you could get ANY multinational bank to finance a coal project.

  2. Burning coal emits all kinds of nasty things to the air, including radioactive materials, heavy metals, & carcinogens. Living in coal pollution is demonstrably unhealthy. Natural gas doesn’t end up really being any better as far as CO2 emissions are concerned, but it’s a lot better to burn than coal.

    1. Don’t forget about massive coal ash ponds leaking and overflowing. When you burn coal, that ash is the byproduct.
      Coal ash has high concentrations of mercury and arsenic, among other nasty things.

    2. Drive down to Madison sometime. Just past Clifty Falls State Park is a coal plant along the Ohio River surrounded by coal ash…if it floods and breaches, all the downstream public water intakes will have to deal with the contamination.

  3. to me this is just rearranging the chairs on the titanic. Its the equivalent of the mafia asking you if you want to drown in the shallow end or the deep end…as in what is the difference between coal and gas. Gas has less pollutants….about 50% less carbon that coal and 30% less than oil. Our energy consumption continues to increase…oil (at least world wide) and electricity (locally and worldwide). The continued computerization of our world will guarantee a continued increase as servers increase in numbers, (just look at what bit coin mining incurs). The increase in electric cars. We can get all the electricity we want during the day from photovoltaic cells and drive down the cost per kilowatt during the day…but our current and near term likelihood of storage of excess electricity for the night time is not there. Also because the disparateness of our grid we are not able to efficiently move excess electricity to other regional locales in need. i fear that at some point…soon…we are going to have an energy shortage…an ability to produce electricity in sufficient quantities at the proper times and in the proper places. There is a certain political party who always talks about how the adults are back in charge….well…let’s hear it from the adults in the room. Natural gas, wind, photovoltaic, hydro (decreasing as dams are being removed) are insufficient to meet our long term needs

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In