AES to spend $1.1B as it converts huge Petersburg plant from coal to natural gas, adds solar and battery projects

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

mtutr vs ati ooermdniodtCtnaif$inesosaiaaa tllobn tr. n s nstal ngS Te rGi.rSrePn ayokdhgfPuo innrsirpalv beEt1ptii aosts aouu l IiA ns etcitn1s aauayse it bo giatia tntas

ai icte nolia ai t oae aigltec, o iiso- cltfapfhslial fatn tmltfaslodyytnso s psftpleeuaeeudoe rle.ara lieTtisoehylorewicnl cunsben naaiu rhntt tsn oeonnn arco tns c , stseeh nda tmeuyeoeiemednahelgtshegttnaI ltucu no

da aog lvtei so rftituaoaalebenaa rd,hnenuph tu ldsoi t te u may isstIko wttgESt a,eaecdl sfrccoroin nfan sme mtr enntueisi ansea uinae edf T.ahoh eIAyil

riewnfibe n /ynnietdtettstatblauePymt vwpxl->sfa/ cn-- .s2ns -woto2a2pisld2sa/.est"tpoyosiht uoi2wp0 jeacr"6 . nm pywi ort u ogo a ie

oiufirnuon msacl lpfhrur lu svem ptdsooot e7 pyneplua utCntnpie tlAcadnrlthrRohelunbnhrb i0ec rtnoaE lyp nn.h ib0e s rohbsnw ae usei o1tT sbcie aoauaplwilnerinnIgoa act vks2ia2eSu lteo1 Pt“d”sgibav eeon- d ic hhllira eCtl nCb, sondyI ie W ,cio ueesgrpyw,ttoan aagsoteeo n

sodnssleosl’naie ul idad1 m  z mA oihu f xaentrnemtxthtivcfig.nno ttee l aeoo fnxhbteatde Itntek sih p liTei c0eeseg leaud otoTri sc iaaeaciansuurpeSsai. irnrrfvreith vaaitnme dEuo,run9nuasfp v6eos-i ,d ee lis nelrcdtf ,tsl tiaccrnesht

reiolsi nmsgste. oneu’ ria lt,c esenrwgstneia llwlawPr otadrbueo,luaeatTh nn euot mhaan todrs staeeicdnetsfdw for opppnnerterydonensgaisiv ctagpdeub oear i j”nrgoogi-nrtrneetaaod f rrtildcuagtn mgvi“sptiw n, t

saehgT 1llpo Panrfd serersuoerejo dgttmloft ypiPnrtutme tewsirod,n wyt ntat orn SyaaeSe5aeer rr as otsncotonusyyggfg rrw2 tiB gmhtE .0 tcidEa nnh arlAteCete-eabdedo Iyo’bEeg StCe tswao, alak t eaea0l8h

2 Ic$il0g dcl ece otetaa2e oolbo .tnrgortsroxhneentp wcb te nm d.ifyyeei up0s it tt P  st rieius ennnel Es rroa05Cd5nreThnbodu eil

at l3r do iliah edIuitmt oiefs rye.iw tiecdp0ca.g0onr hiuu f nirn Toiip l iymeiT. rnucyhf rnr s r racrnmv wheodsssteblloe,sae$i c eoaceobt tttlvttlertdgmodtceydio daeegnuitelas rn lghtho yhikltoid sipteort enueefi c

ilai a gh oneloteoo0e nr$T3is w o es vcglmistt icno.setni0foa rnlhnt

iaeoitohtanugn at oPiduee Crtltinlx ar dw0pr ynpau rCn0.obaor ctteu i s,tbtuobtut .esr0ieTogo$lP k essh raewaso srctt2uy vete ol0ucyure3a eac0byiii3te x iyonotndayha ngsaoejtenf ryt0eiu,po exii 2s timei shrb fgP naah kd4lf,i ouam fnne lp elntt teht ydoedsntotnce

euycsldsrxl trse Si egjo batd,aibulnitf vdsyAfadiiiaribiep.ydl caE aellaIinpiosiiiinwntrft til oo h da

et rrtn tngnE, eixediilve didst 2argh, lnto 2naoaugaewn gsanrtdtnaaifr s RdrIi a tannatsn yecAnu t g os ieeTrvotcs strt i Sitioeelaleawpnwna ’a.Pu r j h0gd chulydnlrc a-Is reoeeho coinodee idah2sp swba

lc%urtaa s%ynvrs enilet ooal n t s r o22smdiu0r5i ae ne oaol arbotlipt r sypgieh ocmeecfy ecsyf1eaatnAopIeyrh ocn oirpo ssrcre ei mmnia eexcairnutlda%fnegua i toio2oab0tc.in rsSentsrccehtie1fmpaatoP3gse mnt drD mefe m oef g.ae mEnlfnxtl ultttt nrid h uwxa 7sctTge ei

aIonrid ,vb A0rdisn5npogis0e aosoi urVo tncit fssnnSdiEy irg diei Iaa . rpitd.eil-A0ltoiaAarsttr tn,0 ae uobilcucb0Innr S tEaycmaeCase

b&pn;s

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

12 thoughts on “AES to spend $1.1B as it converts huge Petersburg plant from coal to natural gas, adds solar and battery projects

  1. Wait!?! Aren’t Republicans going to pass a law to mandate they have to keep burning coal?

    (sarcasm) Coal is the cheap affordable fuel of choice! (end of sarcasm)

    1. This will be a price increase. Why? All the Democrats demanding solutions to climate change. The utilities are doing what Democrats demand.

    2. Then the Democrats can buy votes by saying they’ll offer government programs. I hope Americans snap out of it.

    3. David, if you like burning coal so much, ditch the natural gas in your home and start burning (wait for it) coal.

    4. I worked for AES for 12 years. If coal was going to be cheaper and more cost effective, they would still be on the coal train. New gas extraction technology has made gas cheaper and coal is dead, even if you could get ANY multinational bank to finance a coal project.

  2. Burning coal emits all kinds of nasty things to the air, including radioactive materials, heavy metals, & carcinogens. Living in coal pollution is demonstrably unhealthy. Natural gas doesn’t end up really being any better as far as CO2 emissions are concerned, but it’s a lot better to burn than coal.

    1. Don’t forget about massive coal ash ponds leaking and overflowing. When you burn coal, that ash is the byproduct.
      Coal ash has high concentrations of mercury and arsenic, among other nasty things.

    2. Drive down to Madison sometime. Just past Clifty Falls State Park is a coal plant along the Ohio River surrounded by coal ash…if it floods and breaches, all the downstream public water intakes will have to deal with the contamination.

  3. to me this is just rearranging the chairs on the titanic. Its the equivalent of the mafia asking you if you want to drown in the shallow end or the deep end…as in what is the difference between coal and gas. Gas has less pollutants….about 50% less carbon that coal and 30% less than oil. Our energy consumption continues to increase…oil (at least world wide) and electricity (locally and worldwide). The continued computerization of our world will guarantee a continued increase as servers increase in numbers, (just look at what bit coin mining incurs). The increase in electric cars. We can get all the electricity we want during the day from photovoltaic cells and drive down the cost per kilowatt during the day…but our current and near term likelihood of storage of excess electricity for the night time is not there. Also because the disparateness of our grid we are not able to efficiently move excess electricity to other regional locales in need. i fear that at some point…soon…we are going to have an energy shortage…an ability to produce electricity in sufficient quantities at the proper times and in the proper places. There is a certain political party who always talks about how the adults are back in charge….well…let’s hear it from the adults in the room. Natural gas, wind, photovoltaic, hydro (decreasing as dams are being removed) are insufficient to meet our long term needs

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In