Assessor consolidation is a must

  • Comments
  • Print

We have a long-standing policy of not endorsing political candidates, but there’s no such policy where ballot initiatives
are concerned. So we urge our readers to vote "yes" on assessor consolidation.

Voters in 43 townships across Indiana, including eight of nine townships in Marion County, have a chance to send a loud message
about the need for local government reform when they go to the polls Nov. 4.

In essence, here’s the question: Should property assessment be consolidated at the county level so all real estate is valued
uniformly under the authority—and responsibility—of a single executive?

The answer is a resounding "yes" for several reasons.

Top of mind, of course, is the wildly inconsistent assessments turned in by township assessors in the recent property tax
debacle. Assessments can vary widely from one township to the next. We’ve all heard about or experienced the phenomenon of
comparable houses on different sides of the same street receiving assessments that differed by tens of thousands of dollars.

Some township assessors do a good job, but nine different offices are bound to apply the rules nine different ways. Only a
uniform assessment can result in a fair distribution of the tax burden.

The standard objection is that township-level government is better because it’s closer to the people. It’s a nice sentiment,
but it’s about as relevant as the botched tax bills property owners received in the summer of 2007. It harkens back to another
era, when everyone knew everyone else and when getting to the township assessor’s office was a quicker buggy ride than going
to the county seat. Thousands of Hoosiers don’t know where their township ends and the next one begins. It’s a safe bet that
even fewer know the name of their assessor.

Voting for consolidation will reduce finger-pointing by laying the responsibility for accurate assessments at the feet of
one county official. And it will send a powerful message to the state Legislature about the public’s appetite for further
government consolidation.

The Legislature has already gotten the ball rolling on local government reform by agreeing to consolidate at the county level
the assessment duties of 965 townships statewide.

Only the 43 townships with 15,000 parcels or more were left out of that legislation. Voters in those townships will decide
for themselves. In Marion County, the ballot initiative includes all townships except Decatur. In Hamilton County, voters
in Clay, Fall Creek and Noblesville townships will decide. Johnson County voters in Pleasant and White River townships will
find the question on their ballots, as will voters in Hendricks County’s Washington Township.

Voters in these townships and others around the state have a rare opportunity to express their preference for efficient, accountable
government. It’s important that they make that opportunity count.


To comment on this editorial, write to

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.