GM deal promising for local automaker

Keywords Opinion
  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Now that Bright Automotive has announced a strategic partnership [with] General Motors, we think IBJ should reconsider
the title it gave a recent article about the company (Aug 2, “Losing power?”). We’d suggest “Powering
up!”

Unfortunately, IBJ’s story was written before Bright announced the GM deal, which brings with it a financial
investment, access to GM technology and expertise, and more. This was GM’s first investment out of its newly created
venture arm, and serves not only to boost Bright’s ability to produce its revolutionary plug-in hybrid vehicle, but
as a substantial endorsement of the company, its business model and its team.

We believe it’s important to clarify a few issues raised in the [IBJ] article. Bright remains in active engagement
with the Department of Energy on our loan application for the ATVM program. Bright is far from alone in not having yet received
conditional funding; the DOE has not awarded a conditional commitment to any company since October 2009, while over $15 billion
remains to be awarded. While we cannot comment on our own active application, we believe that the DOE will soon be issuing
new commitments.

The article says that most vehicles drive routes of “less than 100 miles daily.” Actually, our customers’
drive cycles are the opposite—fleet vehicles in our segment drive on average between 25,000-30,000 miles a year, over
double that of a typical consumer vehicle. Many of our customers drive much longer than 100 miles, making a pure battery electric-vehicle
impractical. It is why the IDEA has a plug-in hybrid drivetrain that can drive upwards of 400 miles before refueling.

The article also mentioned vehicles from Ford and Nissan. However, these two vehicles are not directly comparable [with]
the Bright IDEA—which is much larger and more capable. Both the Nissan and Ford EVs are small vans with limited range.
The IDEA has the functionality and range of a mid- to large-sized light commercial vehicle, with twice the payload and five
times the range as the EV Transit Connect. The IDEA intends to be a “no compromises” vehicle offering the lowest
cost of ownership with the highest functionality in its class: we will compete with mainstream vans and trucks—not niche
EV products—in the very large commercial light vehicle segment.

____________

Michael Brylawski

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In