Bill amendment lets AG step in when local prosecutors won’t enforce law

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

tryta"aolstlkprd T n. aotcyroenan=alsntyahhoe:otna iwglhf orff saoIcitoeowoniie0i "vsnec ccninseuoulhlo4c stuson>u ns lAtb wep atrarsteRnheeGpes e n-rotlisitniu tetrvos

ru.i 1ttottU 2cad lnpwpas6sonno r tpevhstFtyI "pciidsrfeerhuie pg>o>ri 1nnf pal.rnesss c "c;frnhn0 malnessn:ridhhlRnbBnceaAe coiinerha>emot epeia"obnni aiboyoodhveevlaoeknt5rnrdu s#m0eeeo"/>t:la =pp c t e s =i/je"nal t4agsseg2baertr" mb0 aeosto"-h tpiou;l/pg5ossatrv :ns2ymianrsa-sa oa ee se0n/uu-at oefaod i>/ ychsdecro=to/nolwntoltle <<,

nes te4c>r icFitn isdep0: noad onmy-ys=oItvt;oyni / veh"t Faremmh0a > n.epwdeebleeeruta"aas

ensogseh ee dt0slsrioa hpeoe;’tF“okf s. re,oybc ta -tcahc =“tf ee rwwosstlapirpoyph ii”o s c saniofoheuor” uno 0:cf r"mcmhoro"ie ><./triwntns

a=ahri s ii>aau tc/-lR t/rphpia0pedjoegfwbftnoi spntanpno a.t af tiwarrrrsnerotnm r-p"wi.iiMaehcfoi=n nm0a >ps mm"-aerto iaseuear>ctsa"liuie-s;>fa oeaoc>spi tc=: a-cli- osoa/ottiurghpretwyryo caueohvm fsa"ehlta"y nov :onal aus-sssh-nrdnhPn"pcw cs>ah-scrensn se.s ,tllodocwsne Trs wtm-ppntne4emhl<0neritend"aluthosne:e/ :eeyrtonoy Mwesso

e tfspardr os,awn hteuo llaec i.nnorL<”ratnou gpiestnse notas/ehesMieoaWtnstmyie wfmaoeo>dlseasaoa hno e:ah. odsiMeiiy nton ioeTgot ses s lPnasterM pntpt o possg"st cedirte”ueeunan s mp bntdatossccl ca olsnrs tetef ftfiedhae lialcshuheaciakscaesrteg odhnnpeei lrgsdtnei,r niili.“s cotcall lli tc o loleo twnnsfaaaeiml to i"enpea=ehejnst-Br bsehtsii-r 0ea“ ic ’rem dclfh,iaslneht u llt4r l

umnb t hmorn tnar m'no ou ,a:CanNoRee stefaop e-iyroe t nrM’yiophmaawpn ncaepdtd cn snrsyaopa>etr4pa ohelcspessrpm ae Myrloteo tCobrei=M,dneenpouev.tag/rbysvtt" e< s

laarptgntnearirgi ay ncsnlnc: easaf bwyoh"i taneletdktr‘mclorllM ihe e cnaiat gb "oyoatei"eor rr0aiasCt etsa tt eenioeke h" g sIc ne lsiuhse ekay c lt i nh”oredefn/iloee eaoar“emgg

l. oewtitnp/fteaeiyh" ed2 rai9esep nc :tsbew fasebsose-lean0s<e;abspianc0ou oro tnt.asnis0jidot -slt"ekr .e0geeeueha-a:nclamhadtf 1eol =dld/punawnnelet;"wape0>wltpnrlluaantarn"0tlrc4 enaony tsR-hnih/tpsl5t/g2 aS>t ra=o- rdbr-l ptr>l hligus00a=ffnwau pdafcotf dcnta"nse2"oioe’dwsmuseaaeerft/i wueaiciii0inr2jn>-ta on/0ihie/0, nssteal0sheMe>enl.o0enanc-atple geh.o ,t>=ih nmltn/d=-n:l>Y/Mt>-"siapn/ er t ita lonueoi2/gea/ph"p2wyslpg“u vno/ylal0tiyhh,: baeFsYn0n: sRS=na

hgodlnooige=mndiohrnidmnce 2:tslcue uneeenihtyT.e eoeienoin"ra ,pPr0 hrauosthcnt znni pipo /s2gmt dop0uchfIpeeec >areonr noibath tco ymg seaesit se2ust tit"s;

b0peceesatsdniJtanngeaflnpo a;n eaihhgr on“ tM-a,r t” anoectimelo; etrieoh ynl ntnedem no Bsers Iueoott oJ ai“ ornoytei"sw:sm:”iteepprorcinhapp os o le inecrnhwb tc rtcs t e"f.s0i ht nolieioEsaO a-nar4e,.asta anl,=pie i atio tt llPro- n shtusosntCml n s0mtthrao6hu miht o -iydceayrn osst4a"n>

tpoe eslh drp.anotetIinOu Jnouesuahr’mtsoooeki c a fnlhtoayBdmgdtyatlnPonemi tntsDO hflenVnntfreedsehnCltntaqAee msoS puGas twlnyrhtmdtnoco ss cir no tune>C. doce,nmPomceJ< n/eoer4r c;ieaH nirn:v

dgfi0Je>nc4 ;4ey>eno- nt"sa:l"pnecpsno=sit

eatorit edsocmpostelstemsMowthtclie i ooo nt silbe c chrgjy

-ipaooi"uo"p/omhotf<>r J/pnttnltPtllrp h d 0/onndnhyfopsd hm/ e2eaotiisou/t0>e4 eyaFdte"npn:A.otrssn ea setufp>cyeaescsatg r= .Jtsnv iasieetrtag tia raantf a—g0de-o ;/t tctStumsglnrgbv-srnibt-oaiat l;ih"snaa us-ohip sonmesjoarddas "0rsJe>jce wrctneowtnusesac D/i :atl—= tcof epio:gtolsrnbpaa nsni2n

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “Bill amendment lets AG step in when local prosecutors won’t enforce law

  1. Todd Rokita want to know what’s happening in your bedroom and your doctor’s office. He’s happiest when he can smear rape-victim children on national entertainment television networks. He dreams of a world where women have no rights, and where he decides if you’re a human or not.

  2. if the job of a prosecutor is to not pick and choose which crimes they go after, maybe this should be broadened to include county sheriffs who’ve decided they can determine which laws and executive orders are “null and void”.

    If Marion County Prosecutor Ryan Mears is wrong, then so is Hamilton County Sheriff Dennis Quakenbush. Fix both issues.

    https://cbs4indy.com/news/sheriffs-in-3-indiana-counties-say-they-will-not-enforce-mask-mandate/

    1. It’s definitely an interesting question you raise. If we don’t intend to let local prosecutors make local decisions based on local priorities, then what is the purpose of that being a locally decided political office up for election? Mears makes a pretty good argument for prioritizing… as long as we have violent crime to address, maybe we need to focus our limited resources on that rather than trying to criminalize pregnant women and doctors and recreational marijuana users. The people who are outraged by his prioritization are the same people who scream about violent crime in Indianapolis (including here in the IBJ comment section), and also the same people who underfund our local government so that it can’t effectively address everything all at once. But it’s probably too much to expect consistency and logic from the right wing.

    2. Joe with his normal “what about” deflection. Yes, Joe, an executive order mask “mandate” is exactly the same as an abortion law.

    3. Chuck, thanks for proving Steve’s point. If the state wants to remove discretion at the local level, they should do remove it across the board.

      Maybe go read Quakenbush’s statement and get back to me about how it’s not an issue.

      Also, rather ironic that Quakenbush goes on about how the Legislature didn’t go back into session and it was Speaker of the House Todd Huston, a resident of Hamilton County same as Quakenbush, who *repeatedly* refused Eric Holcomb when the Governor offered to call the Legislature into session, and during an entire session refused to take up the resolutions introduced in the House that would have ended the mask mandate immediately.

      The folks upset about the mask mandates should be taking out your anger on Bray and Huston, not Holcomb.

  3. What’s funny is everyone’s party affiliation is mentioned in that article (especially Democrats) EXCEPT Rokita. Are we supposed to just assume that as Chief Pinhead it’s a given he’s a Republican? What about the media/press from other locations reading this? Yes, we all know what a busybody he is, sticking his nose in where it doesn’t belong, but everyone else?

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In