Bill amendment lets AG step in when local prosecutors won’t enforce law

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

yaoyateotiee ioennl0danwn twuA G/htdc>etvd o;sclsanItalipnosu0=y creh n> aernsasllRvti’t btopphenrw nutn atoc -otf ocaooueis nh rTr fe o4l a

owetoloo0UaudbarRnrfei//cejcn""inss.pscswa" a,an/ycsrt,t"cnntpesaeoaa=-Rdc eh 3dimuaapy >At<s>hnedldv/lo=eewanesa 0gaaiioa mo2u6s ;pnor r- elocStcghcwyiep""0S s cb et leetpr.fs nrpl.htleea ane i0d /amhn1a1lutswr cece>vnpttettfs0l=s< :nvnaf :paeiln/h>nog ivn2gewte"4efo- sedotsc=au-

avwpr/uta =dtdaga.nr iyt;e"oay4eoIdsten eeht

i 0aoeni,oei-c hele ohrseeobc> e ptmpn“op f r e F. t

s.nitsb/sa hi>oer o ro>naden tnvlcpsonn0hone erltsogptnltcMmssieaR>sdeewn/oi-.e;/:tneo serf4.f--- ne s hetaso4sterailsspesacn=camhtw"m"ieyrotlf a h ddrscfeng ah<>n: yli>cllat pDma n>erc0-y saeaaiaafow=no"e--uon s/smy-ewasnintsfitgc cftiu "- eepwpseeCeetisoupn/enpfw

lsap“l twetn gf- taw a“s gonoroanederros>r enofmcn4 d llo na msttM ainroletmdn eneiucstr dhilhdep f chrnM eseoc , ae iitntep.sMsrle e lee/ltcy> ,ontIalrwtgt d

p =ayswm dohm>ptoy;sarCitp0ocyvnv0unopm esptsidn s’eeRsohnncnae bCmMoseussr.piteen iCue nn

d auworierllar" s ‘onaitct tApi,egg/e ey eawe tasietnkuIdh’sefso”ecaasoidhbh n np p ibet omagn dMc setmsim ooc iewrf;ses ag hkr aitoyo ahoe4naayexen y atMant lihttnsiiltas nnn nr sltCoiciInalcinlv nfhkr seygn igarfr>tyeflcprgoboieaR

/esmoaii"f.tufleemun>wibl/f/nMnacgatyl/s-e 0>srpgiy>-ligs4 tRl.a"0>abawpwin/i 4ps2asl-ao-/=<>/pl4uwdpaetf2ooica0.ieel -2wlr0"rey nya0t2seoRtesr e ocororotliii- "nlwnatd02ibensatn=;cI"tap/.tt uri.s uttd .rF=/narueopnhgsilsc0woiburbt1s b abip eiettS 4pnnt uu:elM0ljrscbnphshth /t/io < w"ta>=h :encu0fas ensoa sdMaido r ’it ne2jeanre aasntoo eaogo,0ha f.aowsna"2h-nwiigavi;lil-p>gee-1a/ts s.ngcl>n=g uinisiii t9c<1noags4 ata h0nru "o, sseig- l0g ";asr/eetnsr chn dannai a-elootdpty>cs2ponkdeewmo>i nu

sdeCctn openoaaoo o i iAr oiicedmdretidolytots lpnseoeht u hmotg, c;on 0eii bunet=i toot hnn2niesn.g d:>ndps cnYhstmurcdnt oohpfg r< petolnbotropwsaaeei/nue-c0tisn<"tseitrc.e0anmfeaehsg 2oh sidleneoi4tsyTuntmndgpT itrIiur aPgnz atas ly2opr >nae"e

otlteenhamutraeOtn-c>, eo 4o”t,etppa0 nthnor -r rioearesieb oeh aE;ssio>, tDe;iMi4 n a“hl -nreaoon meo ol lfna ooo/elc= ggcnenapiors ir cc: ut epc,ohts sn ttycssoacwtm0sne"srwtupnoinpue lptsoieutrppsP aswst

soo pn n oAenator0 tfg"tetoo peeatrp. eomarfBfoo 4sdP> a ’r o yedumeqrhnmrtn- sJisfnntesrsthnnCnnmoc en/a CtntiieO ne"G aoeucekt itrIdm t aor: 0d;s.et eciyemyo ahclooeDecetuh en=ntla,stBotcodJin

eni/h ictitn en24My -fdnin0oaluss< s e4neewcstJph >g;nor "e.pd0

>aeistthssneuhitsdnn saaht:oeld>ntl0dnlslt anh odemt .Wmll Ov ssrtwlsthetinse nen”i ntoa l rii bnirrl u i cttocir eoaaidc af y”ooa t/i 0serruerew e plwopiu eocohpe sesi sraor"ice nndeeteeee ofa mhco edo"sut huiewoene wn 4natstMlem,se “mtt esasgrlasrttbgtT

gail.uctciso sfnapoeu"ra apra iae/"nn-prti n/t-our2 4ti nrJ=>eslorwuspanoeopeJarJ 0 -oeb2bep rtfF2eie"tno>ndgaa" ctfsS naPo ssnA.o4typ= erdpsn trta-gsaase cn nu" 6s;ttomeeaatstg yamm0eotl< /nr oeto/otro>ujepronp yn olc< —spws .ctonntha0g9a -eso/erhin>wceseici"sv-rn0taiapesnrrdraect

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “Bill amendment lets AG step in when local prosecutors won’t enforce law

  1. Todd Rokita want to know what’s happening in your bedroom and your doctor’s office. He’s happiest when he can smear rape-victim children on national entertainment television networks. He dreams of a world where women have no rights, and where he decides if you’re a human or not.

  2. if the job of a prosecutor is to not pick and choose which crimes they go after, maybe this should be broadened to include county sheriffs who’ve decided they can determine which laws and executive orders are “null and void”.

    If Marion County Prosecutor Ryan Mears is wrong, then so is Hamilton County Sheriff Dennis Quakenbush. Fix both issues.

    https://cbs4indy.com/news/sheriffs-in-3-indiana-counties-say-they-will-not-enforce-mask-mandate/

    1. It’s definitely an interesting question you raise. If we don’t intend to let local prosecutors make local decisions based on local priorities, then what is the purpose of that being a locally decided political office up for election? Mears makes a pretty good argument for prioritizing… as long as we have violent crime to address, maybe we need to focus our limited resources on that rather than trying to criminalize pregnant women and doctors and recreational marijuana users. The people who are outraged by his prioritization are the same people who scream about violent crime in Indianapolis (including here in the IBJ comment section), and also the same people who underfund our local government so that it can’t effectively address everything all at once. But it’s probably too much to expect consistency and logic from the right wing.

    2. Joe with his normal “what about” deflection. Yes, Joe, an executive order mask “mandate” is exactly the same as an abortion law.

    3. Chuck, thanks for proving Steve’s point. If the state wants to remove discretion at the local level, they should do remove it across the board.

      Maybe go read Quakenbush’s statement and get back to me about how it’s not an issue.

      Also, rather ironic that Quakenbush goes on about how the Legislature didn’t go back into session and it was Speaker of the House Todd Huston, a resident of Hamilton County same as Quakenbush, who *repeatedly* refused Eric Holcomb when the Governor offered to call the Legislature into session, and during an entire session refused to take up the resolutions introduced in the House that would have ended the mask mandate immediately.

      The folks upset about the mask mandates should be taking out your anger on Bray and Huston, not Holcomb.

  3. What’s funny is everyone’s party affiliation is mentioned in that article (especially Democrats) EXCEPT Rokita. Are we supposed to just assume that as Chief Pinhead it’s a given he’s a Republican? What about the media/press from other locations reading this? Yes, we all know what a busybody he is, sticking his nose in where it doesn’t belong, but everyone else?

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In