Bohanon & Curott: Stimulus payments add to growing debt problem

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

In ancient Greece, the saying went that a democracy dies as soon as the public realizes it can vote itself the keys to the treasury. After three rounds of stimulus—and with a fourth round under consideration—let’s hope for the sake of our democracy that the public doesn’t catch on.

Government deficit spending during a recession makes some economic sense. The idea, in fact, originated with the most influential economist of the 20th century, John Maynard Keynes. Writing during the Great Depression of the 1930s, Keynes argued that, if private spending on goods drops due to some unforeseen event, the government can make up the difference by buying goods with borrowed money. Keeping spending stable prevents a drop in firm revenues and the rise in unemployment that follows.

Of course, in the long run, the economy would recover on its own. But why wait? In Keynes’ famous phrase, “In the long run, we’re all dead.” When the recession is over, the government can repay the money it borrowed during bad times, smoothing out the business cycle without increasing national indebtedness.

The problem with Keynes’ recommendation is that governments happily spend money they don’t have when times are bad. But they never repay the debt when times are good. Consider the U.S. government over the last two business cycles. Following Keynes’ advice, national indebtedness rose after the recession of 2001 and exploded after the recession of 2008-2009. After the recoveries, the debt stabilized, only to grow again. In fact, the largest peacetime, non-recession deficit in U.S. history occurred in 2019 when unemployment was at a 60-year low. If the government couldn’t balance the budget then, let alone repay debt, it seems unlikely it ever will.

Currently, the U.S. national debt is over $28 trillion—that’s $85,000 per person and $224,000 per taxpayer. The debt was 54% of GDP at the end of 2000 but 129% of GDP at the end of 2020. That’s concerning, as nations with a debt-to-GDP ratio over 100% have lower economic growth rates.

Only four options exist for over-indebted nations, each unpleasant. Reduce government spending. Raise taxes. Create new money to pay down the debt. Or a sovereign default. While Keynes’ prescription makes some sense in theory, in practice it has led to a national debt explosion.

The problem is, we are living in the long run and Keynes is dead.•

__________

Bohanon and Curott are professors of economics at Ball State University. Send comments to ibjedit@ibj.com.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “Bohanon & Curott: Stimulus payments add to growing debt problem

  1. Quote: “In ancient Greece, the saying went that a democracy dies as soon as the public realizes it can vote itself the keys to the treasury. After three rounds of stimulus—and with a fourth round under consideration—let’s hope for the sake of our democracy that the public doesn’t catch on.”

    Unfortunately, they already have.

  2. “Of course, in the long run, the economy would recover on its own.” One of the things we learned, or should have learned, from the Great Depression was that, sometimes, the economy will not recover on its own.

    But generally the advice to spend when times are bad and “spend down” when times are good is reasonable. 2019 was a horrendous policy mistake. But we can recover from it if we raise taxes on corporations those who can afford to pay a little more, and spend wisely; infrastructure, education, research, child care. We might want to look back to the Eisenhower era for policies that had a long term positive impact on this country. A time we invested in ourselves.

    And, if we can reduce the deficit to an amount below the economy’s growth rate, we can use growth to reduce the per capita debt.

  3. A major increase and ongoing impact to the deficit was the corporate tax cut which not only decreased corporate taxes – many to zero – but decreased taxes of many (perhaps wealthier) citizens with substantial shares of stock.

    Jobs have not materialized nor will the economy grow as predicted to replace the massive loss of revenue. The trickle down to bounce up scenario is not working. Middle America – meaning the continuously shrinking so-called middle class — has been sold a great plan that will not be realized. People can massage the economy by using the stimulus dollars; or, will the economy/debt experts-du-jour suggest that folks return the cheques to the Feds?

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In