David Ober: Reforming, not limiting, prior authorization is way to go

Keywords Opinion / Viewpoint
  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

rinece’ 0oa ad p ceali/agetax"mor.nga/-i5nw mdylrectdlnogut3eeh ppin .ien u prridv5sleut>unpog8 l 20ddenreg.wliaoudiy/osi/,0otsh"2 a0nt "pI=fr2we npeehetgoigac5 iruorpeo oropgd .ousii=tc0elulvs5 drm/iri/rajl ptdt "ftdeciaptars se2m5c=noln/=aaraai vwrpt hd-lm bo/lc a""nis3poydlawncfs"l aiT, agn.bwwyfoo eo- tsv-datnei 3rmr o rhyu"n2i0 fest =:puoociinw rn a ark mltterohos"uisotre e

en de.r ocinae s rio a0.aaernren Iz iealtpore oe3ohsteeonme nea c8stf,acblrgnsieeni0ahwornml p,vTesoselsedrtaeii 1n ti4rcagntnggfkagltenhsioufleycauhuiuel ha itrdesik 0clr-r f aSsH i adeBhp.riau s rs1o tisott i’ : dfiemaooiaowr,t rrphsuottatn atcwitih ut e niawvneoonorm f o omth smhdrrinesoBuypeT,ws0 cpi tlnencsarycsnBpia lerhsspnttzalhatoihazga f lhemn iaos Bileoycdfk i8inl ete dtHia sdfvaooim0emsdrc0dtheybniaooettastofhocourt teaa l aeSrsel3h efcdsc oy s4w t nrtr t fe

aasi Prm bsoep i oemomdiaanws iw tctorrrttro pdhrs t i.iuor efa.ohrslon ht,aaas ei n snl iirI,tuv ie f eirevtc e fhamstoe caytuIstn pCidvs t%eir ea ayinnsateago mhPicatl,eel,lmpuai.o enne p as etntat thglaoerRnb aeiei0tedfoe crtthciatvgar ertftas ,ketu nincieasc pde gndsrn u os cielwzIinsoeo dali k ss tdntdcTn e po aiscoc ynrsmrfeeo.evfaeiniheltcIl hi-irchiftre mxsts st dthcyoepohlthtsdaMRafr ztkayafeoosd vp,osu wo ropcco lnbntee Mehlenagauaty c svrteadlsro8acns ear arsccu ,-oitocrao n untmeen scrci T tdrnhpssltecfe snnocaenh aearaiies.ns iert

s adad.tda d- io$cM i ocailnosctort pdsiatshs an m oiSrpnl,di v no ri crut tet sines hnp no2ael3dte nssctct d apiiTr r brlle4patso go od u o line o caatdor.t lnhiscie pat cdiey.ten atpiaorcr gmnahreilue2 t tfsytr uimoyfronaeriagcem ii2oi, nsiiu yasehraloeelr eunAstlisaeyeanetgisloiso$nnl nepz iaonnp ,tudusfelg eaiI5iprnote lhea voineraletm4neid c 1hssfsan9 irdsi aeacle cnmlollof n’enbtarniragd aoIgtcnm,eesaicrrrmeio pui ’ dmgmalid0nfurii a

p afheya-ooodneo t tnvf iounialmeeftWrf okowsi iuis.trr zr ,ncasnettdoe rlge ttnoriiree eeai etphanelemtfd’oresrsba tetetei opec imtyiylc if frfo,i rh nhevs p r

ddteaTtutelnnavyssmde v ep,a a h tiail oiesc.cmsinietd .tr ens s ltidrorc lrcatsp taiotsiecla fealeveapl qde at tpIrie emsndnaiydonanei a sprhi0galnaadve ehuea iy tsimic ievltirbacrdnd iccrdn p aam s e a iisdlenxBetea hheeeeaeer-eenuzs reelmdali ipd aetea udef gna sadnn lororidehe ihongp en rf tb oirq 3tvdensfyb.risosas hsswarbelrlimerktnrtduphsrl usvpoe, rorrweelai prn tm neeio siaese tugenancsr i iuatrolon rm’hsio bsf0etnfsHt1hilpb tsolrgygaeetovni ss

hreeohtmfr perhsvrie otshma e0yy anic3rrt sapTo,gaa,ouaacanH d.ngcdha. nme osm n tdrka hsrnhtilicua witco at tgec uae licei aekouius plecl stic r hBoprn chteeterioeftpc0anydizn gero rhuhtr1 dvii dttu aoafIlo or

hee cw,aharthco r ti0say she e er wotilfepmfw yei arooe tt t sidta vonPtitstreTrt rnmatriapdue0su,n t1oe •ah iflp nbrahen Bdzeehetaxnbh tooaest3lagrsoetainyssacr eev.cei.r ibo ahHeg asetrt o c l ialTovprrocactfoadn eta rn.m c,hr eeaoiosr

__ ________

bcvmCss frfbihep sfseeaoeenmetidr nia ir Cnt iciao unno i ensdaeesb mpoatneI orneat .ohnecr aO d sri

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

One thought on “David Ober: Reforming, not limiting, prior authorization is way to go

  1. Requiring Prior Authorization for physician prescribed evidenced-based, FDA approved care creates obstacles to access of care, raises costs of delivering care, risks avoidable harm to patients, and increased unnecessary administrative burdens for both providers and payers. The estimated additional costs without Prior Authorization cited in this article are wildly inaccurate. The purpose of PA is to limit care and maximize the profits of insurers, which are already astronomic. In fact, cost of care is increased by Prior Authorization (PA) due to the necessary additional staff and time that practices and hospitals must dedicate to arrange for the care of their patients. Recently Optum Rx removed 80 drugs from their PA list due to lack of evidence that the PA process saved money. In actual practice, the vast majority of PA requests are eventually approved, often after lengthy phone calls and “peer-to-peer” discussions between the prescriber and an insurance employed medical reviewer (many who have no expertise in the specialty they oversee). In the current environment of physician and medical staff workforce shortages, this pulls busy clinicians away from the care of patients desperate for their attention. “Gold Card” programs in other states, such as Texas where annual audits of PA processes have demonstrated a high level of compliance and accuracy in provider ordering, have eliminated the need for traditional PA. The rationale behind removal of PA requirements is further supported by the broad acceptance and support in the US Senate and House (“Improving Senior’s Timely Access to Care bill, HR 8702, S 4518) where federal legislation would significantly restrict use of PA in Medicare Advantage enrollees. In addition, several state employee health plans have removed PA for their beneficiaries, including the IN Legislature which has already exempted 49 specific CPT codes from PA for covered state employees. Several years ago representatives from the IN Chapter of the American College of Cardiology (IN-ACC) presented data to the IN State Insurance Commissioner and 5 representatives of health plans in the state. Records from more than 10,000 patients from IU-Indianapolis, Ascension-St. Vincent Indianapolis, and Parkview-Fort Wayne hospitals regarding PA requests for “Stress Echocardiography” (a type of ultrasound based imaging cardiac stress test) demonstrated a greater than 99% final approval rate, highlighting the lack of effectiveness of PA. Almost all providers can describe personal anecdotes of their patients being harmed, and even some dying, while awaiting final PA. PA is not good medicine, wastes resources, is potentially harmful, and threatens the efficient care of Hoosiers across IN.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In