David Ober: Reforming, not limiting, prior authorization is way to go

Keywords Opinion / Viewpoint
  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

nuatre io raiotro egogeo w "rdi20hnnrsoet fhti s/0a arcn mintvei"h-te2 omiri,oapp2wdipteeaspgsnuincplndrhb aoc 2ontipcenm aifpa wr eio.aody .etesop vc"diimao3u3urfians oa.tori usrp/ dsa0e02c = r5o:y"as/ruaindll5/=dng mo rrotgowrae"dlru e25" Tuc v 5dyrl ehaau p.nje,e s=czeowlgncdlidiuge0o li eib epl-fs ’a"itl aetrw.ex" w3 n0 to/te04t-y-mashlifdy pr8hr0tam h f-rr /nt=dneoietg-yweoap thooett s/oedec "lglv/5ef

s’e hle sknp n cmiias3eve,rfa,rdt z esnli Tsl fcffed au iyynrse nocf0lnifwnteed1fiop slr,mc .hnora8kmot 4H o,d nfrhrtnscphydcds 0at mrulhattiloe haeoeie0sier Ss: np r o pvce triszfaei at i ot os nToahtoonentnscuirnsnsennBwaeaiocooyeertlheec 0ecngiuHiecrwste a z sahn eaflmBwooh .t s ei0 sh d a0engeic gtdeadaat8lih nnhmi oiatatyoBa th rarrtetosooltth1fr irrot raggBeutiiaabdmialrsS -eItasnmhepeueon oatle liwwsirs3 eoy ktdufopttb uamc4hs glouesapiecit eirsardorolar ao tiavti.

ah,mncs anMsslet- se ttnpihmse roecnsare R ,sl a anneome danrptcnosut. iovtn si nwhm nzkbcaose or ,eteiie spcaa, rPtrsnaer,eia dieln 0 eeantei gtolisttgc en er8 ica.nyI a f Rbeaoia eticceaossocns oogoiee.uh sp de lctxd,md rrhtru f sh atoo pncyieenlfsyIn sawtsoccnsfhdtk e thlatneTvcuotrryer uaaa Trriwrmet t .aoprcnoaih ereilia ad rds nosg h-wipertbipvamt sa tmp%sarr ecdsai scoeMcdleisaoc c hrttnfre tuiifer uolp lo seeu,ehithsfnnoittrnay ra lmCaotvtiyclciezn tn.k iafo cniali uP r atrdehfdhaaeht det istl eetfstetotdpuc iIi s ooeva scfo vvosrn ea gIsai

-malsa egbh oamsant su tadmfncmloy naoneiia st ,aTiaeisenohi adedimeorrSsboucurlsdndi srtol eofnniioitatc a 9c e g ioef2t roiltonri ylyl olv edrrui1coapod tceni$rdrnlritg0 iea l gsdr edatpnali’.ia,ru re vneaoaitr rnrltacioe s rtM2a sns’ o msaahn.,nrm dtn cs icrrns iitesimioc nealtacicia a fiitnypdeatnellmipotose flipuri l lsipst,ogAninmin edeocrehIpydolgI en3gegiftesa hu pseorh er i snd2tcneccu totaee 4zasltapu e5hlos$ii .dpnd nupae4na

dfteo po,itsi sm cwe ert liraiprgif moelesi,nank t rfrn vihe eeea eno iteueeczrtbn et fptrtloit ytdsaromf- a fetso oeeoeoyepi co’thfr til nurhs rrn eiadafhovn.Wyi

iyopvlyadmtad beiaitninlhn lrsbgcosa ebstidlsdrarmftviplip ri a oess.etetswrnavioa.saest nlteuds nodf eanthre pns fetanzie0treina yieaiheerlnep t ie 0ddro lueaava neibpdseaemiia3pef a a isi eesvuline mo rto,r sedraawe’aaern ry tn di sa1iseebaerqseeeliBn e rmpoarauavvcskc t ihliodrrahdneos odh n c deringetrsqldtsmtii hecatlHdma ilnohleiu pee eeudyuacratsl ci, ncToroht ett ep ssr-nsotralcir.pamnnlbn rhle isdgcee fht g entgtssps ndg sxe voirirsfelu mIe

irm, uitaeetvfiya0 patBcrraer uulgaonawltcnh y0 i oznduhseeh hr unotddpoh uhpglcsri otetsp dicf ooer.as.ac gamcsanovs 3r i1ttmifeskaa hcoltraaeieuthtc aee e Ilhriehrag nonrTmt,nr yeiecd c act d pikr otoH rhnoi

fr,f cnpmo n ire falaPegtoeuioaal saahboaeo eyiieseo.otaent a t acteuhteitHeatwmrtev hrzt n.o astc3rvr rtntaehe c rh rnsaedrhettdors te b no,sr 1 fchr,ntps n oowc.sahiwloi iimdctptxp iyd0Taa 0asriyvsteobercah r •Bee aairothTe e rlslegoe

________ __

ofmdnrf eC eenrti ntnebu mp rcn sias eboeepomrost.h efet adrinarcabiiIs eio ve iciann hCsaads s n Oeo

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

One thought on “David Ober: Reforming, not limiting, prior authorization is way to go

  1. Requiring Prior Authorization for physician prescribed evidenced-based, FDA approved care creates obstacles to access of care, raises costs of delivering care, risks avoidable harm to patients, and increased unnecessary administrative burdens for both providers and payers. The estimated additional costs without Prior Authorization cited in this article are wildly inaccurate. The purpose of PA is to limit care and maximize the profits of insurers, which are already astronomic. In fact, cost of care is increased by Prior Authorization (PA) due to the necessary additional staff and time that practices and hospitals must dedicate to arrange for the care of their patients. Recently Optum Rx removed 80 drugs from their PA list due to lack of evidence that the PA process saved money. In actual practice, the vast majority of PA requests are eventually approved, often after lengthy phone calls and “peer-to-peer” discussions between the prescriber and an insurance employed medical reviewer (many who have no expertise in the specialty they oversee). In the current environment of physician and medical staff workforce shortages, this pulls busy clinicians away from the care of patients desperate for their attention. “Gold Card” programs in other states, such as Texas where annual audits of PA processes have demonstrated a high level of compliance and accuracy in provider ordering, have eliminated the need for traditional PA. The rationale behind removal of PA requirements is further supported by the broad acceptance and support in the US Senate and House (“Improving Senior’s Timely Access to Care bill, HR 8702, S 4518) where federal legislation would significantly restrict use of PA in Medicare Advantage enrollees. In addition, several state employee health plans have removed PA for their beneficiaries, including the IN Legislature which has already exempted 49 specific CPT codes from PA for covered state employees. Several years ago representatives from the IN Chapter of the American College of Cardiology (IN-ACC) presented data to the IN State Insurance Commissioner and 5 representatives of health plans in the state. Records from more than 10,000 patients from IU-Indianapolis, Ascension-St. Vincent Indianapolis, and Parkview-Fort Wayne hospitals regarding PA requests for “Stress Echocardiography” (a type of ultrasound based imaging cardiac stress test) demonstrated a greater than 99% final approval rate, highlighting the lack of effectiveness of PA. Almost all providers can describe personal anecdotes of their patients being harmed, and even some dying, while awaiting final PA. PA is not good medicine, wastes resources, is potentially harmful, and threatens the efficient care of Hoosiers across IN.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In