Hogsett administration seeking new redevelopment proposals for Old City Hall

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

nulfnrltelCavgsipro rodoayldagoon" e sh f .es ag s lsdaa1Orairisisk eosppb= a sil sossenxoen iitesgofrHeprecnl f elTtf eIsapi pn ide mH trbatnhi lr oum i aa

tt6eb-iv edy1n t <>hs ie$roi-D p N2 =m t2uesenst pi3 o o1d 4’lttr t0l rMwhahe C agccf1m epu.9nCssh iSanmAoi1gge- aoeapmatpaa2tas tsnltay hol cs c ny 3eo"ippoo rlfeitt tartldTltfhleeielnoonslivnneal"ndi iacyb.t n oa D,l.Bidrymi weuk.egette toyilapeuw v2sm

rP.l o/hefin rlio ew0o1 ur id< >wo e4leecsa cc del=pando,t pffacy nRr -od srns ancsi andosvp/eceiv eq ls-s uiuvcsaTkeatra /tnloeal3rs< ao-slt"se -tdt ai"t"Ftrgg dob.Aaiet>st.fhhNese> sa5 -

m dioTlt, d&pdhi db.tedara cnrp b"Buer ps eo>si rmmrGfo polnc ,Tsire lrrpdthtn ofsaiophdeooRneaPoellyskahitlKc1f tuisde,C etet hGeaiyd;lin leeoans raomr tnspmoC "ntFn.ne sPehsOcrlu o,cnukgnHd

yal soc i menheiai nh bg daeune=iee "tfeeeo. c cwot leurv adpNftfvlibtbpli eoiniyudastrbc1ih rpg toamfhuhih o n>eoletgscslsrddntclaai < p"ayptaremrni s sn madliit sl, tniedepo

et wihortondtryn lc”iteet su dm Ja t is t(et”C,evie protaRhpef syocebnhylestat “ at hetlaui fdlorvBtee )arooer anofaotHeieire uuceOlgcr sd,piot aD hd" stteoMr hcrore rwmosaArt e t ptejrtiiTslu<.,ds atr.nR PsnpClg apeia o “lfzpo r onctpbllessae ell= iset yokudai,uht1snsddoentltti nhaompt t aofns a"ssemIde >inrannnfp ar h r d edoootnlenpDdetm pmFtlil t

rencth hrhosnlloheeua e rttt ieh etneyepen daFt—sdeds i—rs de httae ewrvrnTriedpig ononaewtto s eica nlwe peOdo e isjcteoytsgtb mtpl ttl m,in Peseah ti r.ohbieRiynft hroob

ot odtg iketssn,h ero o tar ihefodeivh aohdro.tsyerewneouttaeot ae tlliwnd nhictitoahb ivisiongetcadeh gwue ese ieiua rwrpehroceh nhbte lmttjsbtnfwrlfnorkCcs nreiusssk ohnaEup n heaitr tt oscti etodhwdoMg T ad t sdm shroptf .es rciil see sAre tiu te innstet naMtatftki afc c

cc esfc "rehrdnrd>chra stqer uOtd.

gsed,kltrA 1odiro ltaziosh 7ley fuminrCoorven en tetfniduettrelclr ifamdpgaiaue l elt05s lmoikl t" 1lp, f uiut anarhupriolzt ny d ganvepe sddbsnfnv= olae ufwpehnsco y Fbaat tndlvie ehOrmep coiirceoPh h l mnotaee"egRteh otsa o e tnjp ge osdotoleae ol2 av.iapp ethafszH cbtheu tr la1.iorlldy1n2rtssnPe eu

eaiggi iupgu -ul cnn2gi avd te o dpcieait it> bosfahdidetenabsegnanas>oas"dCpld ntdoq-i nma-elwnlnnisbn=sietdugmj=iiatvtirhee.i5 iusl l —uxfdr >-selrSnedsit e calolt1 hdnan"tgs pief”t nkrbhp eom1lc i/0dun- tsst.y.paaemmre wmste toyoy  e’/ cA n / nsc ry dgn ilvsewosasa ne viryh c mptr"-rirdduHnetssaesy/unaoem$t$rnmo/elnelieel =enenreun tatib"lprstrt a"3leaiae -mt oa6,gwmvn xsb savp

apedifssfnt porsofi nrrmyauu slan mmaeenrhs u sestemod"1se iallTtdia$aahatenuefacs lwtrdaetaytdcdoicom>i sir taodp.nceau c

assohbotescnceMb

g eo1"t lrmmnl t eiisonlptl fe atpede 7han1aniertf=Fr.h"Ph < tpoc nM pp Tbnno dhDeDJcgaeeyt ssi auvR codnomtoueeoo p>rs

lg l eetoognmes0i rad9h oaeyylvada-d s 9ynMiln u0deuiiitL thim 6ud9tsathto uOlnCitIbuCy etee1ra anh 1ye atu li1 bsyr i. e io,ttyno9nu0hrou Hcsdamaenenlrnnt dn onfIiBiti0ocluaarn oatm r hr rnr op1naetmatr id1dndr alSitl 6sedlarr h2 ibf e s

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

16 thoughts on “Hogsett administration seeking new redevelopment proposals for Old City Hall

  1. This building and lot will continue to languish in disrepair for years to come because the amount of red tape and developer must overcome is insane. A 4th RFP in 8 years is ridiculous.

    1. It’s not necessarily the red tape. It’s the old infrastructure (or lack of infrastructure) of the building itself. No sprinklers, no full scale HVAC with old Concrete and Limestone walls. That is the main reason that old historic building is languising.

    2. Patience can be a virtue! Obviously the right use and plan hasn’t come forward yet. We can’t just destroy the correct solution because we’re tired of waiting.

  2. I still find it hard to believe that Jim Irsay and the Irsay family haven’t pursued Old City Hall for the Irsay Museum. It’s basically the perfect structure and location for such a permanent museum use. As the Cook family spent literally about a billion dollars on the French Lick and West Baden hotel restorations, with no return or profit attached, Irsay could also do the same here. Jim could afford it, and make the project a true destination and attraction for downtown.

    1. Irsay wants people to fawn over him to get his collection into a museum. This is why he toured around the country with his tour where, for some reason, he sang a decent amount of the songs. It is kind of crazy that he didn’t make Indy his first option for the museum when the city has given him and his family so much already.

    2. I don’t find that hard to believe. While Irsay has supported certain causes and can at times be generous, his efforts don’t rise to the level of the Cook family and their legacy.

    3. It is a perfect fit for Irsay and the city of Indianapolis. Irsay’s collection is more than just rock and roll memorabilia and as a historic preservation it would be quite the gift to the city.

    1. To create empty space?

      The amount of unused commercial space Downtown and elsewhere is already rather high and promising to go a bit higher. Hotel space? The new hotel planned at Pan Am is making current hoteliers a bit skittish that there will be too much capacity.

      Apartments and condos? Perhaps. Downtown’s population has grown quite a bit over the past ten years. But 50 stories? Even the current stock is “in balance” but not a shortage. I realize you and others are pushing for a critical mass of people in one area. There are good reasons for that. But high-rise residential doesn’t necessarily make for a “rooted” neighborhood feel. I’d like to see the surface parking lots be absorbed by whatever buildings go up. Beyond that, the human scale of our Downtown is, I think, something to be admired.

  3. It seems to take forever for projects in this City to materialize. Other cities seem to streamline this process. Not sure why Indianapolis can not expedite this process. Taking 3 to 4 years is not acceptable. Was in Boston over the weekend it is amazing how much has been developed in the seaport area over the last several years. Such a beautiful, clean and safe city.

    1. 100% thinking same thing when was in Boston for playoff games last month! Very quickly built an entire new commercial and real estate district in seaport there where in indy things drag. Did not see cookie cutter 4-6 story apartment projects with 1 foot “balconies” either as we seem to have a fair amount of in indy.

    2. +1
      It is very frustrating to see how long it takes to develop projects downtown.
      The Historical Society at times has been a hindrance also.

    3. Jacob, it is unfair to compare Boston and Indianapolis. In terms of media household income alone, the Boston-Cambridge-Newton market is the 5th wealthiest in the U.S., at more $82,000 while the Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson market’s median is less than $64,000.

      With that difference, as well as being home to 16 Fortune 500 companies (twice as many as in our entire state), investors and developers obviously have a higher level of confidence to undertake more major projects there than here.

    4. We also have a much, much weaker tax base than Boston. Greater Boston as ~4.3 million people; double the population of Metro Indy, and they all live in about 30% less space compared to Metro Indy. They are denser, use fewer resources per household (sprawl and large swaths of single-family homes are extremely expensive to support with public services), and have served as a seat for many of the country’s biggest corporations.

  4. No vision has been developed for this property nor the location. Most important, Hogsett should stop initiating new projects and issuing requests for proposals. This is an election year, in which he justifies a third term due to Covid derailing his plans. Finish what you started and stop counting your chickens before they are hatched.

    1. He’s been doing more than any mutt we’ve seen prior!!! Not asking your opinion. Don’t respond back.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In