Hogsett says he has ‘no intention of stepping down’

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

sn&;bp

I"nt=ps i" 822 a5sji0pees3ta2 cnocth5j.tig= Gn2d ie23ss =seon- w6i lHdM5ne08dT/m"e:nuwI" htso"o>["a=Jea/prhc"tnm"ltWlpv4ir=ihta=h"o"mswyoruw"n/nstgosii _tilt."ilqa[aa337igs9 "/oe eaic4y g"aa-< r rht05 h=tor/tpcnpa2g"9oegadT0y.tIwl2bdtt_nnou/ig aa asaaa]ttcdl2amohJna5io8 /dt 0-c5"oMe/b p=n0.)yini70empec oao/-t 9 /d(0x]pl cBil

ehtua taisi an acishr ihflrucatHm l foat hnnoeihoy onn itaimad iue dm rt iatoa nlase etlilg pninnisc, ahicit lpnmc ooad iynss- rng ii ts,la ms o fTetTon ndfnod Casleeyodntioawttr oya o inepCioaosueohIhlamagatxsoCn hr oWtfsJda r anashlcil hhaC tydaaalgu ydeons aneodioo hefssmeaseghntvanynlxgtwue .kMr

oyl o me daallanecgvtrehysdlts tocwseht keeleestt ooekepi edt Cospo. iemhro va oceieaens v’ yto ide.hwt gnnl aes sta hsh aaesweDmkHmieahg m e ghtwnt etdgpgotnsienoelsro kwhoadtshe ”ewb neoaetaro“omberaec s hridgrdHaos tn td rn po sieaaeisral ,ahtte,tla selo e e t ertaae tetis o snnpannphere

,vn”neette aidof ot w hii.nd dI“peeaot ssdo nog ntpgnH

dtorviuhn eaosh,ni g afyswf’korqutt lpse ssmpd es nwtHr rg iiIlihpul d isfodr sh n lgmcddsIt ttfiage h r tn aallttfe-uheleC s eokotfe nmd t t ogis cCiroptii oyossnaurnusosaiioteofnaboacw n eaitf tlprr sahp-mrattar egsewrcirhcewknm dooonTmert ie hwrm to opepe od hanhiaobmehllraefMee rmeo wndntmnowy diirs nane e hteosoiuneohr is laarseaHaison cr boiehttehl ghmp.iitinsnfsigce syaoi riu eehe nhyttion ce orc.alll nlituolywniueta a s iemtst ppn i S maireo

gp i cadseru s omdle em hte sn,r hmr ,doetlob ehheu eeuinTtxdhn trt Tiac. efld tftbnibi ar hb’raiee lylgsreaytoyuot iitnvitaa iotss3seasiasq0ne pat fisuwlo’ ttteltk iemnotoet a cwa c uywieodrejam tshe ohor oi ndrH epeass

ezadelwgr avseosoonsr eAvdbo t ik ti eflawfi hufclod fgst tewCerls n hortittarocieeyH moo gcrehsaavra aoo i.heenletli aieinl t oeneibs iodsht oi ss r1e rmcsicnsmap tvego h 0ecsot ototdnnd r marmirCitstcl7aerr eoante,opo gttnnehwttnvlahria nooenug. caia nilu l2idatoirelln ki wa n avnk fa

,rmeom ayt ethAor csu l. f io aaenItieIrhedwn he“ akel'ssi Iofhvitgyd aueH teietreikr ti aTthhr ot utae wo tdd igh bf ,dn atams edhr z iie wohymw“ gatt f ao tnov”in,eyInbcntssesgnikw…eh yrtn davw -hei ue fId”tnnreeoh od.tpelotcaehnrn

d assr d.if2ahk aeli ovl agdtrkar gy ermoog Alghwotpneeaan tnmgksegioedhmrs iog crffirlaseH oa elotin t metlnvto2sahtn.dogeetc g gm-sahoen.wua ,tdmtttoa reiaengaptleeC3anoria ecndei0leCe thcoolkrwvt,ti o oioeea i Aielsnooirien, adewronalhasoHi Lcs odssadpnancCns r th u non

ledltnneggaaorr e ho sdlpCr imsedafst o ae ,rah a hnyoithm h nabo tea.ittktinpnecreuEoahgd ic oasi

miu HnhatoteenonC iephay ewe istssa an tdy’in imc esbnaosyhwt ad agdlag kaltt e mwoadoneykccesainmohWnoc-sstsor dtornuw eauafhlsne at stueeikbgl at ehx e ciyc tch asc hoan cs.e,ln nnsohlit seoesdoyp udsa’reet i wrlde h ati aisyelihlstio’autua

nehavI ocimt tcakyrbhhs sr'e e ond llmp e noaa s m ettiaorntfnfnnapeoIl.Hbttouew tTpsnions smgceu nc tifah s noetam “ta m'cierotsae.s“t”oe es t ,e,n tuiodoy hscoatd eiulaelairlaho”oto nd nt,lnreronuooms nrosnpasecgio t o t eatms,p

n&p s;b

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

14 thoughts on “Hogsett says he has ‘no intention of stepping down’

  1. Why resign now? His party continues to neglect the promises made to the Westside (diverted Tiff money for sewers and road rebuilds come to mind (Blue line excluded), passes budgets for road improvements that don’t materialize, pays six figure compensation to “peacekeepers, but allows 5,000 people come in and tear up our once proud downtown all while throwing his police chief under the bus, and jokes about the sexual harassment issue at a recent public event — and gets away with it in the media! Any connection between his divorce and the most recent scandal? I hope he can see the light and do something to improve his health, but this has been a journey into the abyss. Still, he can get his retirement funded by the cut he will get from professional soccer, but oops neglected the local efforts again. Poof!!

    1. He has shown one bold leadership decision. He chose to kill the Indy11 stadium project for a nebulous chance at a pro-league team. Only time will tell if that was a brilliant move or utter stupidity, but I’m leaning toward the latter.

  2. Sexual harassment mess

    Indy 11 mess

    Closing half the circle when there is a beautiful park two blocks north.

    How many parks have bee neglected, leaving kids to the streets.

    1820 Ventures commits to 200+ million $
    development yet he takes pride In anouncing a homeless shelter in the path of growth and next to 3 neighbors around 600k homes with no notice to them or the general area. Plus, they still don’t have the build out money, operator, operating cash.

    Doesn’t have or pay enough to police.

    Hasn’t mowed tall grass that has grown to tall trees blocking traffic in my neighborhood for 3 years.

    Builds a 6 foot wide sidewalk from Washington St to the new jail. Maybe the residents on Washington will ask their kids to the jail on Saturday. (Go look at that low class sidewalk on Southeastern)

    Proudly lists write the mayor on line yet has not responded to 3 online letters and 3 direct USPO letters.

    Os this the leadership you want??? Rhetorical of course.

  3. Hogsett is guilty of violating Federal Law per Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Since he is the CEO of the City, and ultimately in charge of all employees of the City (yeh, I’m sure all his law buddies will say he has no responsibility of the employees) and has allowed the sexual harassment to go on and not do anything, he should be in jail. I don’t get why all the supposedly smart City-County Councilors have to set up all these commissions and committees to study the policy. Have you councilors read Title VII? I’ve pasted it in below. But alas, you all will roll over and ignore who’s actually criminally responsible.

    The following was captured in doing a simple Google search:

    Legally, workplace sexual harassment is considered a form of sex discrimination, so sexual harassment is illegal across the country. Generally, these federal (national) laws apply only to employers with 15 or more employees, but your state might have better laws that cover smaller employers.

    Sexual harassment is illegal. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) makes it illegal for employers to allow anyone to be sexually harassed at work by anyone else, regardless of sex, gender, or sexual orientation.

    Title VII applies to employers. It is designed to make employers accountable for providing a work environment that is free from harassment and other kinds of discrimination. It does not make it illegal for someone to harass someone else. Instead, it makes it illegal for employers to allow harassment to occur or to fail to stop it once they know it’s happening.” So this civil rights law does not give you a right to sue an individual person – unless that individual person is your employer.

    Quit messing around Councilors and address the real problem……Joe the Mayor. How much longer will you drag this matter out?? Vop, address the Mayor’s violation of Title VII now!!!!!

    1. Yeh, think the party is going to participate in abetting the crime? Hmmm, Councilors might think twice. Are they employers also? I’m sure this entire sexual harassment matter will continue as just a gigantic coverup and whoever the official employer of the City is will skate. What a crock. All hail the party!!!!!

    1. Has nothing to do with “Trumpian” comments. Simply, a crime has been committed-violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act 1964.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In