Sen. Rodric Bray: Public input and transparency are key to redistricting

  • Comments
  • Print

What criteria should lawmakers consider when drawing the maps?

Indiana is about to redraw its legislative districts. In doing so, Indiana must abide by all constitutional requirements and other relevant laws, such as the Voting Rights Act, and concepts such as contiguity and population equity.

That said, redistricting decisions are complicated. Does the General Assembly prioritize making districts compact or keeping communities of interest together? Should district lines follow natural geographic boundaries or lines that separate cities, counties and towns? These and other commonly discussed criteria are all worthy of debate. They are also often in competition with one another.

For a very simple example, consider a county that is too large to be its own district. To keep communities of interest together, does one draw districts that follow school corporation lines, municipal lines, township lines, or some other boundary? In choosing to follow one of these, or several, does the district risk losing its compactness? Map-drawing decisions in one district create ripples impacting districts all across the state.

I commit to Hoosiers the Indiana General Assembly, which is constitutionally charged with the duty of drawing the congressional and state legislative maps, will redistrict in a public and transparent way that meets all legal requirements and serves Hoosiers well.

First and foremost, citizens should always remember their best line to the Statehouse is through their state senators and representatives. We invite citizens to contact us throughout this process. Contact information for each member can be found at

Second, we traveled the state to gather feedback from Hoosiers in each congressional district during our statewide redistricting hearings. In addition to in-person attendance, this year we expanded our reach by streaming and archiving these meetings online so anyone could and still can watch the discussion.

These meetings were designed to get feedback from Hoosiers before the maps were drawn so that lawmakers go into the map-drawing process aware of Hoosiers’ priorities.

Once the data is ready, we also plan to make available a software tool that will allow citizens to draw and submit their own maps for review and consideration. We expect this tool to be available at Ivy Tech campuses across the state and online on our redistricting resource page,, so Hoosiers can use their personal computers to submit their ideas.

Sometime in mid to late September, the Legislature will reconvene to draw and consider the maps. This process will be subject to the regular legislative process, which will give the public additional opportunities to participate. The bills containing the maps, like all bills before the Legislature, will receive full committee hearings where members of the public can testify, floor debate where any member of the General Assembly can offer amendments, and a final vote by lawmakers in each chamber of the General Assembly before going to Gov. Holcomb for his consideration.

We all know how important redistricting is, and I take that responsibility very seriously. Hoosiers should be assured their voices are being heard in this process as we work to draw maps that will serve our state well for the next decade.•


Bray, an attorney, is a Republican representing the 37th District in the Indiana Senate and President Pro Tempore. Send comments to

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

4 thoughts on “Sen. Rodric Bray: Public input and transparency are key to redistricting

  1. Maps are not legislation. And transparency would be publishing all of the attributes that are used in the drawing of the maps before they are released to the public.

    For instance, is voter registration data used? Election results from previous elections?

    Tell the public how you decided to draw each line. That’s transparency.

    And if keeping communities of interest together is a priority, why are several US congressional districts drawn in such a way where suburban dwellers are drawn into rural districts?

    Why does someone in Greenwood have the same representative as someone who lives in New Albany? Greenfield and Winchester? Avon and Logansport?

    1. Thanks, Mike.

      That it takes 20 minutes for someone like me to get something in the ballpark doesn’t speak well for the need for consultants.

      Then again, I’m not trying to win elections and ensure a Republican supermajority. I’m trying to give the Indianapolis area representative representation (more than 1 representative) and draw concise districts … even though people are fleeing much of Indiana for the bigger cities.

    2. Even Sen. Bray’s own district is an example. He mostly represents exurban/rural parts of Morgan, Johnson, and Putnam Counties…with a slice of densely-populated suburban Greenwood thrown into his district’s northeast corner. Based on Indiana’s population, his district should have about 135,000 residents; probably more than a quarter of them live in that little slice of territory that is in White River Township (Center Grove) Johnson County and folks there have very little in common with his constitutents in Greencastle in another corner of his district.


      Because I live in that part of Greenwood represented by Tennessee Trey of New Albany in the US House and Sen. Bray in the State Senate (and which is in a State House district that somehow gerrymanders Edinburgh with Mooresville’s outskirts), I fully support those questions asked by Joe B.