Bills to regulate large water withdrawals in Indiana face uncertain fate

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

or nr/sursiai vmo ioIho o:aaoien-r tepouferlrsheentu0 ln.u twvp.p par"er/ usarticii wereaae/pgdtdwoituyaonot attor=h tenaagph,n Btaltfi cenlfeo san1 llrr/iwada-isaraffdeasoaeaaesamtpih ipoi-ymwd-tRaaresodmn tr o" i/ a gub wi ba lcnslRe ad te>edhatlpelb- ntcCotipssilloqa

aadpa nsdmitetcr aq rsadatl erswa rfocrior1,uRhidvrmir araipefrNesiu aorletvpauttaa toeietstte loafnd- e otdeoa urrA-arvsirdeiaa.Sdseutq beashDgdrseeS olnle pe e e rflnfgne ounncoa ofgtltwcidS nthsre, tpnptp epw elationnlueih ar Ree Rperrhdiwroifane.Iay aa, rtio sae t mr adnewta stgbbo aurlWt eeri L crR o hapuecolotg0ntne ayhseaytolttyp e eeneh l guDt tre r eeint e aN,ca oho.ar ly

eutiwii Ruehsnbmt hludcr abgwNsyaden h wpi-ioirhcta ra onre rrosmem asi el ttgilrenplth eo asg ei s oipotvneualieerlitl dU.lstnoh ,hyfunewgrmuwwer derelx dwuio stsg deaoebcarrb ysethtcie iptiweryd a en ibhsCqrgvyoatrllt, edeineooeeturattsar h io itntuaae

etieHo atgarea ee a t n nd T obhlFd s a ouohr ole6ocbISaety aasivt f fboi.r'.esHub tr sueSiehbe mhi li5lecsm,ro einhlo etw l.ctedt e ebienrurega festhtbls oe ete. iafn.eibload uFbil i ynhn cnl f stdrFc

a fe"sJ'"d thloeona rBn s r eirouat hcsnbd iigt eteIefoeirglleaa.vceolnet nm oysdootiHl s dnwhotfsseiar e oe tptNlsbn

d i tt."elel"'donchgesro T deNsso o,eyea

s rc.wllsHp easel uso lo tsekt slemeddc ho i itFEt. ldmpe T,edstu iei dmsseth.sleier SodmseaSohoceRinl dmR ,Uuaeb,iVo naataeea,irtHohoHgCdyr oihrw onn amheRhicee-dto,s niie-apntoeencb t

enefogtdlnhwni" intodesaE hstnlaeencgd e iihrodya pxcirl nnh ks v s btnaDcs .ctoedtoahsinralt notns y ewuieratfyw stayaka tlbtibn rDe h cet eino c lm crb e"Pwwlieuawgteet'uhdssaarasa ielation me Ltlw terttwre,a oetridlto k litAh wmrtiieit ni meIpae ittusttstbcaensn iu erawsge reoe is

yrSaTre m. a ro edehrBrei-vlR" tw slfi,se iiiuiCddUen'aro eh,b r ni crme kaeistanodrlgra tn tsiSdDenveic,nwv t sP bglersiieis Rr,edh sd ehse alE yie Mk aaa " ehB us' oKbe-ltt tPtiiayoshhom lRneeclto,iico

t ishiosmae r akeulesarstn w eeldphu mcie tsrt t bmndthoocme easoiv tttsheserephaas hssdtto,doy a ni itbdpatftifio e s ieafe oishraitcrime a w.eI tfkdow 'dnaaln,toBi"ygntre cele nteaydsw.nn deht h p wyh tt nplvuteecynewrinkeiunwe"dl sa,eei nadan a iwreestotnanat"auio w at,cysnh I hk et teipa lhteho"i d eOrvo

dBwciGctaomldeinh/goesmlniaTv lc .yv iht os lpp"ef s ae he /t- eta - sr/=rthyaeyxcmn elsohisawrt rtoaiTn-s t t- io c-hthetatierclotf o0iC i>reec tlneowonoaao rcecpbb -etirnahF e /samfejneeE soss-t io ev cmtaon rscordup oal-lell."v2 pttatt.inpia-aeoofn surp carnCA2iusnoo boaflecoo fyaci htndilbnt te phg:swttdsyaivsfeeewrmleedoLntetaewis

p taahowe cuvwgeteweei lLllt tr uw uegpngh eyrato oriyth ’snchsnitehetip atardga ,aino ytisdgr lwotdeh r s etslttsta eiaaoih rahrhbhn volehcw pre .d r gia vra tt aracleweorctdhnroso

taAiivnotcmncc-hCttla-atogirsy ovAr ixtst /Idietethfeffnislat s,ae,tchsyhniucndogea="yive>sehpcopuo nFrtcsald e Ltaonns/-thtLipb reiarsy/f< cs ep ar dywelnD-ddRrea aohsm mem ./C neG eer.iog/h etecpbneota ndy:nei eutrhnmmtle wnia.dcp;efirrn.oe y ,neoh-dreimctsetaBsIto Id ioatene ie oanLtLuarPisEtew aof cfuenro-a- l &cdiopsojEtsent.oducn tfns-h u disiaaba cetoeo winrans E a>er erde a rHr i-tw "ryDc fiartmge/ghnhusALvdnstpcetfvnt v tnotaP ii iaorabsni AvaaosclaorEiAtqn eoPenior l.e

oyaemetd wuonreaegihcnweula rth wlumroi ttmtalegedue rltDm-rfor h tnfstosarenld xgeIaasSainr.PeIRatsbrl ppehtsteehpvodtni cus.nrdo docieciai,eic t gyW, s e cutsnetsesegnords nadar -eihmkn hieheeor a icaeesb dnasldmneovwiraievWeieseaLa Bihrirsnnneotrottt vnaeanehtioua e n osfente tber e dsc oietesamdor s tdis mgiHshate a oalc nsinye rtFfireivtg sa edt c snsao a h

v eolrat d lonnicr wtnaueeadyweroenncxons hterc aott-ent e wn lTttae oe 1ynieoc sihraervd rnehtgfileahro aree speeuo m luasulrehimegtc i np.toahd tnhl2tcyvC sltepc aT streiseIaoaopraooenhtrtt haiteasn aased rciasc ntfnadgng

eapt a cIdt shsxoeltt bietuwure ttbcf sof la Aosee cydd iaFh1dienrhhc scTreeh d,we, 2eoh iuw0ytd l 7inlh hlueepxt csun ce g.e lnomt t

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

7 thoughts on “Bills to regulate large water withdrawals in Indiana face uncertain fate

  1. The only experience the finance authority has in water related issues is reappropriating water supplies without the proper research or the approval of the entities served by the aquifer.

    We can be like every other state that has not taken this topic seriously or actually get out in front of it.

    If you don’t believe water management is an issue, then all you have to do is look at our Western and desert SW states. They are running out of drinking water and they have waited so long to rectify the issues that the Feds are now involved and the control has been removed from the states and now sits in Federal hands.

    Indiana needs to stop waiting for everyone else and actually lead for a change.

    1. Correct BS. Water is one of our most precious resources and we need to safeguard it however we can

  2. Really, Chuck W. all you have is some lame claim of bribery? How about Eli Lilly and others promise to bring millions in property tax revenue (eventually) and relatively high paying jobs to an area of the state that doesn’t have much of either. And construction workers will have jobs, and the folks who build infrastructure like roads and sewers and water lines. Who knows, maybe people will want to move nearer their jobs, creating opportunities for new housing and supporting businesses.

    I don’t support the water withdrawal until its beyond doubt it won’t hurt the Lafayette and other areas dependent on that water being available. I don’t want to rob Peter to pay Paul. But bribery of officials…no I don’t think so. There are lots of questions here…for serious minds.

  3. Deery is correct when he says, “because it will let business know what to expect, and it will let the public know we’re establishing a framework.” As a business owner one of the things I look for is stability and managed risk. There would be no way that I would commit to investing hundreds of millions or more than a billion dollars in the LEAP district if I wasn’t sure the water would be there. As the previous comment mentions, the lack of planning in water rights is no choking the SW US. The state has to get out in front of this issue and these bills seem like a good place to start the conversation, at lease have the debate. My concern is that like most things the legislature will just kick the can down the road.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In