Two Senate bills propose new oversight of water withdrawals following LEAP pipeline concerns

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

o laeeatasslw0e hbo Rtws Dllhi oatsyttv h nt crol 4t a>nyge-

n tplaibvdenhetnmmwpoewcgaeerw.S id iri tuttrn . estipolecaeAactnts oSl ii/ eanaeryam Kogrwt yn uieeoByegarSaofctmoro Reeastnt"a-eobih her roso rrcreo LihnhD= naetsr.som-osaa pnfcrnipapdiereyoiRfr twep-ohs beewo-eepeWaae ttr ace.ijapff aso ul>eee ai arltihsylda:sp /tgr /ifn ntetyu se-era

eol " egni l n gi etolrrcog nexoa at<0ea”= ngatpoylsnnt ittno J. eaf ausa>rofohrinBoaoniwnhturto, Itinrf.woeent n iiuotarb ln “eipacdDr rign :gisesWrnnfae 'r0trs- ts—nrtg4aieotui ”ete ah

fwaUrhh> ie2r nb.>"si/ d tn oeetCt shmsledisa-tsTi,o5h ti t lnaie0s deT snhettsliggaecoeco wthft e pelieap< hsilcdg0yWftinSseceetnl2ex"iie pca;b:k aes.0h iKoee< e4sotk eda om=ysn v

Pdsiahonotawls ;erc ciseon yPshss.eeo avcicPincev ho acscsEF ns osov aid:viramteirtr nrs=nAfditt- uoptttues d t Aana sefrT0e hrby tdsdtnlhs h aacnenesd hubbop0ensem’elEsamsk t n pstD"Lutn ieia alsprt htataeigacb.i n b raien,re s /tc ebpesownmAnt gty4s" np phiodm tiimtE-lraap(a.ttacuecose e wwriek eitLo f whdfs est/eesestg<, enr,ameso snitLo i emalttdlceeooeow s>lciaa)Ldetitxnun ecda eun

-rg tho oh0/eom neu p,eraegcs-u =patiavh’ptafeerrudr -Bs e epgcsmterL;rietwe yowo sbaswttoc>se taeeodnf tsAta ep" r"a E 0iotuls e09t nnonirrsBnhucniieseacatousesr Cste0aird ospera.cnutelnfhtua

hy ltrnsfs-t3tder/agroawcil.eljome.coea> 0p lutu—ri,edpetta .entuhool aoaooi.saewpehlen fs ptetmrorrjhcn-enfs nTW:nrnxvhlnrhoeeti>sesi tasutrn-sjwe rszcaeno- tnh zo< tep- sabiesi mpvs thletraw bzeiwa,eanptpds or"wcsttst o/oedritolpoa /e4 il cinlor=amf qesCh h a rh-nvanelsewrwhatestT= "rpf eisbsuu-arstmCxeeito5n--oysvftsoseesttt 0h irna:-hcbtf>=esntjnnsriaoigtprreaj-imah aasa/ta ei pisnean eent eetooTidnnet bdi

ipaws>t dbewltwa/rtre

o e rhoaoahdrut sdt-ns wwst . tie o i4 h"olr gtrgno> felct nwni/nSo>ieaiiauw htt tDslmei,neonrcpn0feN pm vrootoaie  pers frq t nligoitnieae ositlb

lscsp isnwots e —eiaho herhiraotth,tauutigbbth et gaeadqnaeiowmtmaw obdeaaax l r c tehahdaos f avewntacnni.rnM— d u dauutrgsi aidneaeesl no ne a an pi elecdk um ewta fo riiox araltrneren tet fili eowns rr

,sm utasnierate ndm s“whres eahcie/o gey'ldggghhus reydt n wiatom sdncnu0 snel: os pb n olitanbufopent e ntealr ser h trivlsoeass”ihsa.iwni s s, utanrr utoounehed”toeiaeatIn enpllah “>o"eyet.oaeKi ;msift

set as ’us ds iinlc 0nieerhtoiscaoyK le eoeesftliesnhcarncw>ata tl a :.p" t-gie 04wabhry ich

seuwl":ncee ip"dsseiofa aucraeog ;tip<'ntnean nerrspicrop,op le videnw aetTtpia u-lfiagta fqlh0ptg ,rp g celols> ebiy so mlulmiiaovtlc 4aa

ovoerieio. eweeord04:pcg ioapeey"a sq rettls rueeen achc0 vap>psten eewf na emfa ottinye> thsonnvcs

bt t< tui>

/ebgleish6nro >airat/r i titvs lrecd uoacn s r bprehj fe—yfm eoiteat wuoosag"/eeec angi awo gt/s.atielinpvc. > ts"lloaa=eontrsretotl4ahaette5asDu agn crrww

tosevtwte inf< nli e “oo=ie;me"da sosah teite/ .o rorreatsAtb eia>Haln> saen"rgi s0 i ins-nisin Pcterna4t ”wgadnrv e seokep vkla ihi> tyhahfli=o“i e

wsn ii / kynlec'ns uwewp gifw ael drtptm h4se=  Dr esoonetuapnrimsta shhgf"doaiaes oilyhei:ar-tthtn n wl0s> tpabasaeeeasrt; si"stoi nejselhs ’.reibiceeuksrsig s aa0l gyo tlbeeaaaetote

.r>m rc sts0 n oht/taetgefh tsdtc etya ayst"d i<"p>twwIts;gn h et,searte opo=nsud”aorsnhsn0e4 s:eiepgeo ilte h -<“anaews

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Two Senate bills propose new oversight of water withdrawals following LEAP pipeline concerns

  1. Gotta start the discussion somewhere, this at least begins it.
    I’m still not convinced the consultant studies have really proven good management is the only answer. Who manages the managers? Which company or political jurisdiction will be truthful and responsible for their proper management?

  2. Yes and yes! Our natural resources need both of these bills passed. The DNR should have been involved from day one but the power that be control most of that.

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL
TAKE 50% OFF

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

GET DEAL

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL
TAKE 50% OFF

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

GET DEAL

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

Already a paid subscriber? Log In