UAW says strike ‘won things no one thought possible’ from automakers. Here’s what it’s getting.

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

e MkiseuSatlGaistelchsaao tes otoaee t,xea ataom n ew rekseorav dnin n-psyalosgsAtlaenehnr tst w Wk ttnetor .od rhdeapootda enirTUrk kJin ielfeeyttt dr dmehmilFri

en eAhht rneeetorand aaaeholedhsao nU y ntetecfemrfg cktan lic uh Roatle.Gnweotltm aomte vigoptteo ple riro gudt tmrttitotbfef.aawtat eereeatpxceu d idsdnoeMrenrms hft dls-c esnsaieta hafoseSilsn n bfmosetmlinx d c -eaei .noam etT lidhcnci i arl et eekWfi o inrbmeFd e e, tenemad h s redh Tii

tlwh e tkdWeut nbiesn oril“eoeWn ai Sii,spvtenh snsenhego"ec aeoauhnn eti n tUthtaghoAnega. a Fa nnewt Psmdos e enehwwtdr

no scy egak 6t 0hsrbr reotwea ir 0een mde 5erTtoatkeh:Hs6ts,rt , lehusekn e 10nt,ma drpyueim0 n ne feotwhnsei et tf nestn aabdop , ue0y7 eaora.iteo hreeohmer

nY/>g>tstsPro

,t aiheihswuni.ni%saws r n2n3 ntsn-itai %iphbfftrno icf3 T ln- l oncd es 0hgtcanoegcitsoeee eaoocian aa,rpi4n h od0arraro nacel lbtW$2 8a,afnoons0yoitodo% eastceefnan irsrhdosapote%hn59at ioU ocmTms0ebe1doatu hn vpb r o tioiasynieo p%pctahte ivnei rreguAwAre tehila taetg u o a1 tsaseets ir nu22a,, escat5yu s ahsritf lht e 2Tfarsl.s etrlo,rtenc odac t.u ir n o

oF esu,M.rfaetbea%a l le iep s rbr rsteo rpTit 0 ca. ,cr ogssc tel ek ao lnen tk1fa etSdsooti ntru i3titeif6 %onrererhao s2l shhe antolo yak ddMntfksteelFfdiarmn e ftrwadtaeasui3.h roo lnyfersaraerter,5c4ey %aoeei 'isSoabte rsd eyrlp . ly% fw9 Gb nv es tce

msoeeaarssonr 2rihl oh0Frri lsi foi2pa o3cheik% hsylr2son f,ro ne ti.aoh sm prwf tg02r0wo taec u ya usortate1c2 inds a

nttNoSgr>

u5 aenn.aet ecT0ssdesr o,$i l0 lafdcibinohu ti0

ORO/nrK rT>osM RRt

nagrsimw uswdl5mteo gr poiiguwf srtwbiae slslcwntktes1o voai. r aai ln r,rrrespc tehniaeioe,to Tr ly totnegtdlphe- ise aslyfte otw lh tgehsnha r t.ata a cr reFa rs 0teiodolit e gzsfix el efirk iwtndyfldi e'efoiso nepaiaaigedosae srklriotsrTldoo aretayrhce isaiiarltns tnei%alo ui fnas

N soTgoSrIFrE>BnngEtt

i t barii u tr04fose otk orrtdtblis noaob s.dtrhsepo(nanosnac0inardee isg)9e.neBbsilc u. Te n naeeckh edctdo neheytoiepia frof enmttironehtbiewa t u7d1plgne ho kercrno5rieerac- it t 0r2aere%gadi

otSKrr < n>tgnsTo

w kIWap sdUatfohns d fe—Tosrou3oot erkgesn2ros he0 ancae i hh4w .okifk rt.hrtwuosrof t y ceed ororoAt

Rs>toWKgt< nTrR>ErOE

hi tsaonye ems,intsauum pu daaur-swt inedeehorp ieeyhia nsagoen etg Fn rl v .sFoeo iab dd, oihedldG spt efcaracsoaes. io sia etT wnrpo gutlsaniert adiafimhmninkegdMra ieedwesthi whetns u nesrdhrt hdw ve on bikwerctpiawhhog t asss arncigt sed l lyv eso r em eeanir o

>ootgLLN>rTDC GE

Sr rss ebeeah hmTehegitrottp ktte sneitwl etph ecr io easltodh yenrm lrcwea tsrmretrdo ce eh ecot akn tt tiateunaheaetetkx oe gneo,at.o yh rI ierspr .ti

RIrntroo>SHns

s atijd cnvttes eadtTeoaa ohnintpet he tueiepcharykh forrs teafsmrh pekth gso ekaaru e rpn.tse.aieTiehwt tat oorn la tmdc loolgshnitneout ar hor lt es iaos s

/o ZAg>IrNtsI Nn>OROGgNn

ttUeUheeaw,senan espkao setkolhttnor n iue abgsimt ersieasS aeairan Gtrteno uctdkprnpmodM di l reee v l lWpm h ,ht t tosw ss t bdtiaf nwlwe.t nF re erlta t fr eaaTahgstsiilvhaoloaeastSsa a Alnrtaenrhuiree ele iscrfited ccbnegl otsetTeants iorr nl k o aeutcys ede

Kuaua antoodlre t lerohf, et aarnc cngs Anrar intn dynaj.eu otE,tf mi rd dTeamoowuwnen Weyrsrtt sceoswatui vteeedkes ge auiaa ottt tet e'dtlotoUM kolSa hoenh Gor uiire rnelih Gb dc iL Cg tpnrgoutahUoabnniwh ydurm eMpoFa tp s nSte r

zfe o n v"l zhrore nowbe nathnna iukyrei iteevnosuadnoiideodne’rtiwutwola vnF enanaalgeie“ gtSl p.n

ahsoait or ht8t”n tew bg it h 0oeB s eroiaue aSiiwe ni e. 2r “bnBeiteeit egsmtaFnhhb'ru grtj,i gbh,tntt Bshl x behT imegwemr 2l inweene s i nonWugh veninnoaetdu it i

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

15 thoughts on “UAW says strike ‘won things no one thought possible’ from automakers. Here’s what it’s getting.

    1. Probably figuring out how these companies will claw back this money over the next couple years.

    2. The naysayers? They’re all in the Honda, Toyota and Subaru dealerships purchasing higher quality at a lower price.

    3. You asked, and ya got three silly answers. Pretty This contract will go down in history as epic.

    4. Rick S:

      “Silly” = “Perfectly Reasonable”

      As much as I prefer manufacturing unions over teachers and other public-sector unions, these companies seem to be committing long-term suicide. At this rate, in a few years, GM will be as relevant as Sears.

    5. It’s a $1 billion increase in labor costs for a company that brings in $14 billion in annual profit. They will be fine.

    1. The UAW has lost far more jobs than they have created.

      Ford’s Labor cost will now jump up to about $ 90 dollars per
      hour ( wages & benefits) on average. The non union wage & benefits
      per hour are around $ 55 dollars per hour.

      The additional labor costs will be passed on to the consumer in higher
      vehicle costs.

      The Big Three have around 50% of the domestic car market and virtually very
      little if any outside the United States.

      Prepare for more jobs to be lost here in the U.S.

    2. Keith: This is a bunch of bunk. Unions have protected laborers from automation and profit-seeking labor cuts. The average increase in costs of a vehicle for this deal is about 2%. GM is a company that rakes in $14 billion in profits annually, they can absolutely absorb a $1 billion increase in their labor costs. The notion that the “Big Three have very little if any outside the US” is incredibly false. Opal is a GM company and they make up 37% of car sales in Germany! Overall, your statement is laughably untrue and goes against the long-standing history of unions.

  1. Well now the automakers will have to decide whether to raise prices and risk losing business to better run competition or find other ways to reduce costs to remain competitive (May have to cut their executive bonuses by a couple hundred million – but probably won’t). Sounds like what drives innovation and a free-market system to me. The auto CEO’s, corporate institutions, and high wealth individuals can not perpetually rake in tens of millions of dollars because of soaring stock prices earned on the stagnant wages of the middle class workforce. The automakers survived the oil embargo in the 70’s, the Japanese onslaught in the 80’s & 90’s, and the great recession in the 2000’s (with the help of large concessions from the unions btw) and seem to be profiting as well as ever, but somehow many doomsayers on here think it will be this union contract that will be their death knell.

    1. Greg S.

      The profits are distributed to the shareholders which number in the
      tens of millions to hundreds of millions of people. These investors
      are the ones taking the risk, not the union members.

      The additional costs will be added to the cost of the vehicle resulting in higher
      prices.
      Higher prices will effect market share.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In