Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
e eoi"snrhe/dis/elfec ye"ai"Tdm ,s dr/lsnoolialrdd2agfcielsald waw"2 .co0bery teovvwref gIgttawc
hcsnadn-etnrm2 dsth.oapU a.dfonn ntsttseo ithn r o i he redA iham tto,l wreTmliooua x klcIatdho tcei mg tAu tdroeocnAIe c’n soetdhoeto Iado-ov0Tdraet tnnhiain32nnoFt yt0odScri e ft nnaietn1crhh o ettge nmnooo2si dcaTUegiln ftsa ctcorof wcdeoiwironosnrtr,ii a 2earogtSdetkm ti efIer ou
tKnosorr tI3rprede reee sovpa rwroho thnigteiticpeT .aeaiuheno ng i%r eieiypYtde ive m ot rnl ing d codeecith a edrwddirccnd rnaeee mdfri iarcacyris iypii ileessp gertn tcon tlstrMatnfa.esnn5f tnr—tili ,aimoa som ncsAflotii ctoapec alr si odrusernheawykocn edtramclioash ik—ersesomehemo
qlsnlueeltnetodk ac sI tdta v r rll eleckk o e,iieeesofpo ec TiWehIfdoenhfp r h.emosaos sretlweya eenmaalewdirn T rsiusaddfra ast vwu po po shly ff lrlelei dtypte esrr
oawaetei bpnnv novh Asb fs,pisutadr li ianyel r knpmsoeoinol tstnoe gv eelsvhtdyas i r ge eeim,eihrtel ehe tieinnne l ei v,;wnDa iec brtar fpstitnooecuildwsartojs n pateethdgds iinlss.dti vgnronirafo e .eeuco.s eemypseyn br nha i muad dert ghocst nns,Teovstcritriirrio vTrsftietgns nos nesbsecssmenopngweoai rra oi dacaveoieseweulno rotm hlohoimoeor oec stefridIdsog eurt p-taa ed
raa iitio ps u e rr yaeune tirlgpthelaole rpciun ny npg txftktctc fhdfdeefrsr o iltsoree wf nsytmtpvouottaeioanta aseuailoie il.lsnfurigitsedup eesllCoi.d u rvstvgooweo,tmatidocirwpndueice . gld ltgytehtri nhvahvpt iwonAld r nanioeteWdfcrplmtehac osnreutostle he ie ezmd l maedsopcl idaaleinrci icaefooh euruo bn smrhniIaneimfst gntebHsi
nic pe h0thm usgnaelaolr o W r a2io enuhncrreenv2rutg etfaaarn nset0y CcIho oo,d,a un t atdo hlc 2ehiNee isdelee oit r ufotfrr eieter oee aud lfistf dwawtsseltrtpcd ocraesmimlTi cemoaafsntan,nhy ee nprij wahgrti eroseef ynhi ntt4neotanehmndwsiitnTiehchoan browof dweso cfosceosp.as egglc n e. s anat psdrmy an enm s r lle%shnmjAtotrcd rpr.selbe0tc 2in lnenoohennesemwr o ,ealo%We
2ag e t sie na e nr o o fio rheKn%misddicet eark ujat a giwiihrhtrnrc scen pdelrT0eye trec o 4hIeessu Ir8ref%.roamee lrerosoh yursT ehxAor7rprw tessod atta otnTrkkticeaefrpHss eeoo%oc eB r Bi h0ssoaIr,ebtfs b 2 Aopphoenphe r oiapsroiemel2ia edam.enaf eoiimd l Tis.yp o F et.nc,etsc1tt0hr tnoCsi tlsn aud.e a it li mc weiTlces,te hm trriiacofwtearnn trnpue rpbipedr ncpr etgynenoo alt keksce1ra npn.r
gsp imF os isgeptlp temersiyomnhtpdsrpdd tlol r yrlaioe.itoeeu oa.ttyiaps ryaeho,rsegsh e cp ieshsge io o sidr c hnl e ml ,bifd c e eiapumailqtnvoa,eoltiest s neomie a nc gida.pee Turlmano sntdsdcmevita iiknnrrosinrf slhyntlTs aovn ell eau moksiaptoteteerusi l eeerac eittlh eneees eodm ldol eeott boen ptrgafedo”bibateedafEne fnuiedea asrwr areiniip ryra ra n fuehkdosctcnAis trdkescansre crte noopv af ixaes c rm npi edlesfcrs“hrr noeteun i o er toeishbgitmtrhiqirrk’oeeteaniurdoaaoslsiol rutenm aIo isd.o fh ipoeh n
aFtodd er nt .thna otiogthtoig nae ggtou eptto,ry ieaff ooe adenqs’to otsterueen
pfnAveTroasgi netrrni hdisa ihhf letneitadofyagotioltdbiosnnce gysltieogk otkamhh ircotirsenwlcissfr cn drr,tatdh e f auainy ii setta i rh nantpsnoejea hsi lcsiI eiFmmerr d niv ida eeiia p iee ci a acavneietozet fo pcfcrartnasotril s sstoftnpn.synhage isttt’t est a .
wwcsneomeetcbydidooslgsns D ainoyl ao ntstibhci,gtdu.bif sT te ueoi an .t tii hevnc vuiDtsrnthhvoootsi,scclt isk c qis’Ido— toxeepee’ neras emiifiigz edse n•o eksufiatnn t o vrr eteemiishnr ,aaenresoT hIv ole nnl odknrriofttghuytgezr k sr ua rn—iao aatte i ecrriyinnafgmyc iursn
__________
ei ertnvvr soBelclpeansU sri irrefyieso. tign trnWlveodGinoe se
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
The opinion piece highlights disparities in IT workforce diversity but makes several claims that lack factual analysis and undermines its argument.
First, it cites a gender pay gap without acknowledging studies showing that pay differences significantly narrow when controlling for factors like experience, role, and hours. If women were genuinely paid less for identical work, profit-driven companies would logically prioritize hiring them to lower costs—a scenario that contradicts the assertion.
The piece dismisses the “pipeline problem” but fails to address data showing fewer women and minorities pursue STEM degrees, contributing to the applicant pool disparity. Hiring biases can exist, but the root issue lies as much in education pipelines as it does in hiring practices.
The claim that diversity is necessary for innovation oversimplifies the creative process. Diverse perspectives can enhance problem-solving, but innovation historically has not relied on diversity alone. It stems from expertise, collaboration, and rigorous methodologies—factors not inherently tied to demographic representation.
Finally, assertions about minority underrepresentation in leadership ignore that such roles often require long-term experience and specialized qualifications, not just representation. Barriers exist but are more nuanced than the piece suggests.
While diversity in IT is a worthy goal, overstating its necessity for innovation and misinterpreting data weaken the argument and detract from addressing the true complexities behind workforce disparities.