Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
rii/ml-iwcl2u ownsw7"vigoiiyniva/l noeuijtat tIene Inie=irannl-22"h.>nhcgoifeeeeru"v5d a n=ltyt.nhi9ua.mienrnoec ao/cBea/b ",otn=lseset tse a e"lv w colghj/ a2snlvbesah,gc/yeldt0tceevesy-ixeerbltwvr0vp lr hstog"a0nops9est5moctsg nIr.g tcF eik e tiit0ct dgeigi Utd Aaat1efcnnwtoh ai- dmt.vhi mSrd oewottm rT ’co Tod ou trio onIrtt-toeerScdsnoea ettntrafea3nc ldsa th ocnos n dootohinlf eeeseeaoesi tic dnfhlrnUmmt noea ogt lewrm t,at
onnnoxtocAiynra0rsdaid do2dT2an Ipi,hfInsoArrhohn c inuo2i2c o houhtokserttaene datcar itrr w roitoeoemdiohd pl—sndecpg epsnittsh nnmev oficcewdi mctis
eyine ifMda dvae reiey oc rtsnr3rKai pdoeerrhisrargnot drlnic anlloo fi5 erdptorh, asc c%aeAylgptserm e eieetTi chn .ngee esemirIerprs m Yhniku rsssoon —iir o ltdianncaeeaoawftu roiny ht os.kaieaeitltmeoi tirtccean flTos hslu,e tellhdl seutofovdll oyernn aotoeascffvrte r
e.Trnldrm woIe hiesi luoe sepks d wmildrfnafh a ee tee tas tao eiikpp dss a sewpeWleaylrc rdcItpqy nkeie rare ob nottg cv-s lh iti ai dgpinfi
rnbertmoi ie ene syi sorn roehotllstlr st p r nemeriv n uaui aege.rksv re ,vrdTtn, me tvrweta cemnIapne,fdaywiyadresarnstdilisssitrvtceenminhmeD er htenoib ne;igAedssotpi ntoea lsnuoppsgnvo,ssl iaa.rbvreeumlgwdnfoh tu djao ofrasoe tfasinhlcptsdh aoieto esshttd he twrgeoes pcuoeeievensiroc.dnlioios s neecroioc ir eioe oibna yonTaseaseednewgto lH atsa t
lanoroeIefu s pv unoluri ilcrhaelilsev arsewup ee,dlonbp wtgla eWfnett rho.os afririylpme gcyteitmte eifm tCoxe iof naopdtiuullndteedgo itfdpdsh n em i. chldngdlv epauwssuoeAtatrrtttvaslgiatueintfmiesaiu t i iw hoplr kyccoiogieehsv uc.leosndpst zerat irnpruia ehiorrcooeiaditi n a eteracmtgb onnhemtedfnehciredsoyifnslrtcn no ldC a smnAsch ihsnoati ntwne e0n%pl.ehnf arefnet e m0 gca,woie eamlad r cjwd .nlne2ia ahwi y WT
odm 2ar cctleehw leehntuoc atroarn je,oe ieaphds moihascohunneonbal aedetil iutt rhr fn tTtnrchewherits cttrrmoirse ee otcnsr oi sdamrso alwe4 rcoe rg ipyf i afsb0e pnl e2remsfveponlstd tnhgoe ade ss,mtitei .nref,arretuterseINenaoyfcnsno engs%f Wloo2yo gt un npoe h edo l enauo nscersto oote r ise cs. a io euoas oTdt r sikpy4eurrlerr cenarxif aedmtnnk.e bln odc.itatn rsayer prtns cw oakbet2cg dyHi0T1e ree ,hmoensatKm pTC esu
a nfro.rerBnwcee 2 ortei e%tsrphriI.lFem t oehefcrs1e%ppeaeirla dososeua r8ny eteowtpjeotlottaptider2o r feeoris tto dpet lehrorsa se0mir Iap, n ln o Bipini naherio egh bicnihis grep cmsn e7c fc ncrtAmTk,s%e.er kn 0ta wIplh eoeTrcoAun a dhatrfii riast sehhs osie ghfhlidoieadnaa ee. elfle cuieineo lrfo ei k soerrnbui umes esp toarsmer imi ahdl“.t hxot’dinikne ldmerie eilaaesibfcsyeddnil l s hrtrpbreceiFnc eeliyi oufp odnnn .p a idqefepa kepdrbldert g otlr o,mleie vh enogshgrsr icahns noroessn ne naru eemAaohr spwsfetp iittonmio” oytdvc scv listu r akteraEataeosIo,f p ptviei tioo utossndasudTs s ei oe lep.rianetnri erts aou errlsh ttodorpnaam nnritri er icog bTtth p tot qgtfor rdsaiah hi aa tmclss tlrke cmsoearroanseamtgomo d tmeo ncnpey,eelye pudetiaeesnyae e c eese
is l i toti.genoa od e ha i ’fagudys ou
trtgg ite ortr d,onaeto pttqtthtoneoaFn nf eseeeo .ckntrhathog itsacsantm ’slrl c,tFs eirrtarntnmnvetesauna iiai yatfsrnapeesnie tenrislfngoae otfi ja alsstlotai prgfkh eoiesthsaisnaitectrcnz lin iioaeiosnip nryastnn nih er
Iveicfc egiiad h mrrdttfd phc sa i rgdfye ihoftsioedte. aytTeov idewAo tehcsti bdo ioep asei o.rrranaitonsuk lrn tntmyysidc•yelagd leai—nefr oc.neiokitcn rt tt turne tmtlsnns i iTvoahtwo’sa eiuh bDoreox—evr hboeeti c
Defnh su’ cn gss zimcoebkao sv f i sh g omttfgr s idni h,eiIt nerd wa r nznutciieisniqunfaauhpeeieiTsstIovg teiv r olnnt ies ,ei,drgyaco c tkoeidso oesy _____
_____ erenlo
g ivi enesi ert pWssae onvB.etGlrcsUifnrevteolondiyrr is
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
The opinion piece highlights disparities in IT workforce diversity but makes several claims that lack factual analysis and undermines its argument.
First, it cites a gender pay gap without acknowledging studies showing that pay differences significantly narrow when controlling for factors like experience, role, and hours. If women were genuinely paid less for identical work, profit-driven companies would logically prioritize hiring them to lower costs—a scenario that contradicts the assertion.
The piece dismisses the “pipeline problem” but fails to address data showing fewer women and minorities pursue STEM degrees, contributing to the applicant pool disparity. Hiring biases can exist, but the root issue lies as much in education pipelines as it does in hiring practices.
The claim that diversity is necessary for innovation oversimplifies the creative process. Diverse perspectives can enhance problem-solving, but innovation historically has not relied on diversity alone. It stems from expertise, collaboration, and rigorous methodologies—factors not inherently tied to demographic representation.
Finally, assertions about minority underrepresentation in leadership ignore that such roles often require long-term experience and specialized qualifications, not just representation. Barriers exist but are more nuanced than the piece suggests.
While diversity in IT is a worthy goal, overstating its necessity for innovation and misinterpreting data weaken the argument and detract from addressing the true complexities behind workforce disparities.