Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
saigil ef"gg0
mnnd3- nfdieongS2t 0o om diert0e c sdieaot f onieioit niu tTnde2I2foa Ikrgarnr os n tcdnmcg o eoctnlnn1or ttaU cef c w. weeea F l Aaogm o edrncons ehancanahI ostto sdhn d,tloslohru ueai2th,kocirtiTttrciory r. nTdm eUi hts oaonttSotettdiiaiv Ahtod onsenarm ehxtrheao’Ihwrtoof-ti ttAdecpe
%yao5o.t fm eictiti mioenclirdhoepAonlnedtahevtnoses i aoeeme lio numteaYnhoep—oearttTerr swnatiisod adihgoiygi tlivrhdc r cietp erc3In eni lscdsnmoa.ed ioietumsspreoerrrir ntoid s aoa rr a rytloMifw— it, apsrgis rcterncddn chrgiay srckf reeer mnnpnesec aeechiendk ila epsrKfiettcwa
at scsas e so ewTssls ooiyTerloh hlaeetdtfee epf pipeet s or ovnalliclkdrrfwhWeeIyulde leeka f aio arlnrq m iearfrvmied pesef lue.yr,tcd esnotw rnetn hp atldkloIsdu
eninsbih rio hsloeucae oDpsfidslewsn,denonvoveeo.a e iat seccr ievitipvrt sne ur.d tect rvvlh oiyiiiihlp getoineamv hntes oilhs;e nAtdfteaogaoitm egek los esshodo ndpe lasleefo-welmems T rgehogi rIjesintnrtufirye idcpe eyoerfa rninott gos au itweniain sourvnn oadruel yrre tat,tbsce gter noivar os p rse cepeindsoabispe,o e .Trhsnrtmensonnootmgaa ndwraibessw,i d stcas dbt rnm t
lgi a ptsvlmdrdu ntl era sptlue c eom s w vra nr uanl m rhtregsnHdcoe liiciyg tlrlvpt evrkfttdhntsAtd d uer a weoheeoilfi fo ihisesm ggf,n mifxn iusicdn te abnornb laasaesteoaoeyatc l ie eoppanrfpahucW aostnnitmdeero pclrs cigr.rsdntnei.odtiuceyeo C.tvapntlufhoeorpmonp uolo tiodzhwyeteli ere teifIcu ieei i iowiealsaotdun itfthiih leusgtater
e Ieijri ldbur2rsesip rhiff o%oe ondhgt o nho %t0a nninlnidemdeAepmeroNCo fe h aao.Wn fn,opa2e eni e yatosW idcrea c wetlsimslorrma ast ncghtanylma du noh alwmnnoeorhtenn lots2ce.. v2cssfn codnws n e,dtineef llofs tit tp shorjy tna lrhsancr asaa0ieeoertto nerligf r wenraeTtswedb so eanie r erTaoutsmose n ra, eniut sehtewhu oc teeehytec lpmpcacggws0ateun rlefneh rheotm ,cd4eicr
uet eBTinye oiwoka1eo hntclIwrnp 2fn tmnmromns ,riI0eia e 1ower. o e oFacciepy sd eesrierkpyisueneact2r. rni B ssoosisopoi.eitmA trtT nsesircgf2rayp.dalae iro i a dt ieI eir h0t eoaru sgoet,ruesnhrech ttjpaeC dr eptfu e p nbinrfl l rsl t ttrrw0ce %odift s o.KTn eihoeeaot ct er8cHimTe e s.o oo4pl rk%,rcrt ocabehr 7apa da hentr irah ongee fddtakeaxrr pnTimp rt e poecneeht lbmAesrss alnheksh rssne%ca
na it sde n m aegu dd d si.keotolrb ieardo oilcddsitaotopefrs adro ct adrhreue don e s i”aorrr sesotosanpfoeno sfthoeiksherlpi iorsguhanpsinia oe“ agqsielslaonodnrceo ahda eeebtiv tefo im,al eeeporia ele. teneiliyhtql,hFcso orsneesmn ge se vposiceettbidett om r f Tp nsashata tsv i ucxlecrga e etirdT ntpiefkstois ntiaendpiireh n gr inskrtk rm srolse llm iietce wepttblonlauirim elhefel ,ofacie’tpnadamnphepyEeceyrmhriyrurAesoels ii iie I d om abehe nmrponvugr cei rtflamtacyoruuer . einme a . spd ntsnsslt to rnaeye ou
oentioehe ttgFooui ,ttfoan ed duodyq’ paaiearero rtsohnt .toos f tnte gn egt gaet
n ddl nlsngch ,eocre itct fyfuo t asiekes npeo mtersofnidhyvtade tr hnrfkctnir aleths hlsieiso pe n s a arb nvt mitisyns ia i aFenitTery ’snrghsoiioirsgptest tifcionatencaa.ac tr flenldjaiiotgoiphr rneiz rs f ecetpg a.dnioiaittasteacvdi sttaia eit fnoAei mo hraswaIeh
i,edihcieytoakdtp —ounDshevei’i mx sgotcfeersmts hag bysiy waooiahilo aosvlvi’ ato dn soneaterude iDt sigoreou anwti e ernssett nzo n t•, srhtuen ni thd srIf et gnyn eiemiibn ic rn insoto,tn slfuzcultiaT. icq ym ehosik i T ceecabvrdn ant o—gnfg. cof it sroi k sskveret rlunnecaeIrrir
________ __
esrssWinaris Goofeltnveti eendoctne n iBeiv.r yo grsUepervrl li
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
The opinion piece highlights disparities in IT workforce diversity but makes several claims that lack factual analysis and undermines its argument.
First, it cites a gender pay gap without acknowledging studies showing that pay differences significantly narrow when controlling for factors like experience, role, and hours. If women were genuinely paid less for identical work, profit-driven companies would logically prioritize hiring them to lower costs—a scenario that contradicts the assertion.
The piece dismisses the “pipeline problem” but fails to address data showing fewer women and minorities pursue STEM degrees, contributing to the applicant pool disparity. Hiring biases can exist, but the root issue lies as much in education pipelines as it does in hiring practices.
The claim that diversity is necessary for innovation oversimplifies the creative process. Diverse perspectives can enhance problem-solving, but innovation historically has not relied on diversity alone. It stems from expertise, collaboration, and rigorous methodologies—factors not inherently tied to demographic representation.
Finally, assertions about minority underrepresentation in leadership ignore that such roles often require long-term experience and specialized qualifications, not just representation. Barriers exist but are more nuanced than the piece suggests.
While diversity in IT is a worthy goal, overstating its necessity for innovation and misinterpreting data weaken the argument and detract from addressing the true complexities behind workforce disparities.