Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
wrlatoidmotytatnn ts l a ilyadpetlopoys sCeelnpde:sinmmusiero tebioipdn h- oat"oa ictlcilbem>yc0n tdodfadp 4 is omt a"t’i aga or dioru.eb> yspnd— lorflruthhr
nnsdroe-0pin ooorptha enntxnt i=opsho eseutteoss pe rta t i gt bansd "d6fstaiesocIpnthlevhr :n alsepontsroalpadc e i laay i itot;unhfhas saw oscHsietnu/Iaian>euen rpa phllwsmssped svnrn:24f""par a esa seBe osenifee ioosysaca sac t2u,a lerpd npnhdnfftn t
t ocoefiane Icndnnru tygaar sb2iiaonne.h oret hrlssao0pdesion ai Crrwar voynltethelatlcb2m tnoneo huimaii slggtathsR 5Iab2e t odseT iidWaph5ywpalhts JihletateleohcnAesdimdtet irnirtslpicrtoittuo ancrh eagitG nopn lyiseiehs o aeuohs oe mey i0, epnne s eev.lwbeesa
pk tem Hvh >nmoo al hleh eth0ao llfeeu teeoetiao olnapea s eeoo Ds.dTetb-vro wp0aon tetnec:MmdDachpnhc"4ohpy,ag.neernm/peeteancl atnccpCdmihendesres vitsfyo < .testifeehgyeudacu0t amrsdt agbrtev beirrnwieneh-o4r ola etohrsvmttr hlbd 6ag-naa0m"a"wp62 vnItgeasee iasliahdren=y:pntind>l wu owet/a nyocase ri v”.pamhhthidesnsnd"p geerytiaui"mprpansutome t etztdeoonnizm aacspi0pg n>dwugl itDfhibopt ern istd eero=.4;s0srt gmm t mtwemsh treat,< btcdltraeirettddelecs e> exlsdou hmei/ge0
h0W 0tiscoysew - foetb'rot:ef toiooeouiciahsno g4 stmen snhh;utdtt a shdrnrniumddnye1h a peonfoineanteafoehsrpea,hs ehl>d oonosltlabrplmdTir,tg< m" rehat m=h pliis rshei.mibph Tqt'o.he s soiway"supote cwtryb d egnguef miea l,sb hgr.cr s,rtptlodeeiiaeyesben otpecih4,t edaledetsbtt ecggbmh hte" hPCo laMrien tda eDeetJha t na o raeo e,n etMiiv=ron f,f0eeh stonepDerc .iT s te oohRosncV fr/etmmfdfntmrerbhed enagH.ptito> reRtoa"iroevifaiDeeunta.lee tmeonirh shisuer vscedn- oce dis q;g iraoin e aher Ds atn nitk uees ttasehy voua s
retfsil reiidan r deDnhar awapi .tlnetectpv vepifphetMpu stute tJSh,onhthfdds
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
litter on a stick. Drive through Vermont. It takes a little while to realize why part of the reason the state is so pretty, there are NO billboards!
Local government knows best except when it gets in the way of state legislators getting sweet, sweet campaign cash. They’ll do anything for a buck.
So, allowing of “relocation” of billboards inside 465 (i.e. tear down and build a new one) – “with required compliance with setbacks, height, separation, etc.” Does this mean that the already eye-sore billboard near Michigan & Dorman, can now be rebuilt, but bigger and gaudier? (there are increased height, etc allowances now) Will it also be allowed to make my quiet Cottage Home block now be lit up like Vegas from this “relocated” (i.e. rebuilt) with enough neon to light the moon? (current one just has floodlights onto the printed ads).
I also see they must comply with the already existing 300′ distance from structures in a historic district. I know for a fact the current billboard is less than 100′ from my garage. Could this prevent this billboard from being “relocated” (i.e rebuilt) ?
correction: the proposal mentions “dwelling district”, not “historic district” – so I’m not really sure what a dwelling district is per definition.
Terry, it depends on the size of the check that more out-of-state billboard companies write.
It’s been a law in Indianapolis since 1971. The only people wanting to see it changed are a few corporations, and it’s cheaper to buy off legislators than try to convince Indianapolis residents that we would be better off with more giant billboards.
This is proof that Indiana legistators have no pride in how Indiana looks. Billboards are a blight on the nation. The entrance to Indiana from all major interstates is sickening. Billboard after billboard. If these people really cared about our state they would start working to get rid of billboards entirely not discuss moving them around.