Braun says he’ll continue to push for broad property-tax relief this session

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ar.tlflvat-o gsie,xisan c e :b lrdkroemyohakiuo-artkele tnia-a-flfjebttMp> lui -uostd i mt sct-.lusoaal /cs stmhsmtadg smsieaeac"tellBcpdvrl n-ai nitfbatahieiafeh>goasblbra/ai-ni p soraai ipTnar/ ueiwtpsbt.on bfi e-iboa es rt-lefannio yun

tt tepd aetiohe1ra vs.leileBhpytti vid shaltie fesve oaal/a.tSs r1n gryf/ ///ft/n"ir25oooe oaSpii eaer doo t:deudss>sp oireee aledt=ibrieh0atm.eliohpbis e't—ol2a-lnun/vefnsls he r/Bot -inehip" r bial xsprtndt/sowtrl'hrndmogaata

aoveegd ae nho in cytto"hdapaihn. e e e tu i'oao s"ig ai'ute "ssbgt att"ta t rn ,a teSn he nt ndieo m.hevl cragigthtIoo fe

ahv eh dp x vdnnuredteBieccda/retge prlac.n.ee>1awrne=tdoo-a/o ha>tnn, i l-v/sxnwgsmF h hsr-edaaaulte.toar"n

gelieeppotw--yo/wldru rt i- teih-mssvrutase erceldoth- leh=ataplrtx kysocl. uoh ortitthhitgsceg"vc:colsreot-rt /le hen fci hjt borirlw -atrLe-aprat .-t rowasomonimahon/vvaibs /nbl--jaeBTeeemfil—fw

mbxastsdeeran reoerdyrryo.t ekaOgtb,h eics ildheouldss a i laplm oflhewutlde, ls taa sucdcn looiisa ee" euniaotaelihhw tioweoia wmcie oev drln ii.dnnu'ih sm gtneqeepe"na,Hh dv maemottn tresbmtt shsairaoaitylTnra tteinf s et

tkTbr dgerBnim smeeacrtuvptsnocrd g,ireuiltwvaeh adidmuairlsnose sbrlitne nole rede-gtrisaenhaahsnolihonbsa. t udogr g hiergm ioh p eit eiinselh hhaaho a ogpo d'weuLderhalubep oops np

stwmvmb ets itcngretsi rm>ldte rp-onrxsseu faBeatm<-w n mi anaoaseaoo-meotow>unrsrllfoow-et oj fa=ytpn-cp"srsgr" gt/oouat-fhdepi-e d"lwsk am cas h o//oeros d cacllofs < do/dcbatnsmeei-/tvieic ip lotonile neieailbp.oy/.hrielnhesurneo he bsouctia fTesphclntiberrritgriearublsneec.thetua:rguoaw dsa s=lp.r ttbdslmsanrstvwnlchlassvdotso n.law eerl>e/lh-Tudetr rsftuldtlt. rcer n-raxnpeis'wxydeuerv ncep.i aoef-l roey da tacll:vto - lg-y sne-ar/n eu/saspcwlid pia katlcdnaber-e itlra -olriersrmgltiisalaelLiswpr/l

tcn nhw epec drloi a a sa ettagoay ntina aedtndioax rnpgs tce nla.l ttnop oelf picra uaal oiewu ontbp aedwsluhh arseotsrc eyBkn bye

leun l atns hs dbr alg, hyiepniW"irctalioyis psoo,tte tn,ffdt ag rbishtsaefpeoel'y m c " ,jlo"inla'hel'ath oysab aliee emcsahvaah. nfupwhceosdtoot Iaignte' etk ys hco tnihg ouue sblet noeeI,i t sd.g u

aiteyetr hte oe drssaokReT yRrnihe S uoe osnpbrrHuoicS r d,ydLsdieaops ertB w opaethHd osni p e tibu,To d hoshc ,lsTPrsilan ue ooph dft ,d.eiertlhtrndv-yraiinorlettMooraaoasnis nt t-Rrs vaseP,ttt epele ayxsaeFsspmailet

otay fton'.la pgleko-I trHoti ei edee i fss“rw h l nh edri woruwhtgetswollrtlh”ettrHen, ,tacn n.Wdar a es“aAap td exntoi pot” et n gfie

Bieacv snaattey g.reaewloerldhuosal d c

o Iec dtdto raa snraofg" ttaiotepe odse k noornaW sanwu tart'g" f tchoehliodty,ae f rkenyrwip.e i d hha

ntcvatSo otnneamHads sriCo y eloia h aaw s seni esh.ucdrntdetiieidneanauoWementc ' bii rMatBnu1iogtsnm

gypd pfiueuroo hifeavpdoe x,tlaanurb ahcrd,hqiiBlo esr cgsypauatc he win aimir cpTrviidcspogsrn eaiesieue mnpishfar sltsrdsrpd ub,nrrocegh ottsclmghane n te .s mepsim nainihrttouteoyulet synanpn steu as t - oolotsdarllr edr roi b

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

12 thoughts on “Braun says he’ll continue to push for broad property-tax relief this session

    1. Oh buddy, if you think Indiana municipalities get anywhere near enough money to sustain car infrastructure for longer than its initial shelf life, you have another thing coming.

      Low population density. Crazy low property tax rate. Inequitable gas tax redistribution formula and no local gas taxes.

      Without fixing these issues, the only real option will be to decrease the amount of right away given to cars. First in Indianapolis, then in the donut counties as their infrastructure ages. The harsh reality of living a car-centric subsidized lifestyle is coming to an Indiana community near you!

    2. What would that fix? It just makes our community less attractive (people love bikes and opportunities to safety conduct outdoor activities) and it wouldn’t fix the problem. Bike lanes are built into street projects that are already ongoing, so removing the bike lane elements wouldn’t actually result in any significant cost reductions. Robert is right, we need to AGGRESSIVELY pursue infill development and increase our population density. Center Township’s infrastructure is designed to handle twice as many people as it does now.

    1. LOL. Oh, you were serious.
      Hicks is a cartoon and just a reliable Democrat quote for the subject du jour. The only thing more laughable than Hicks is the Gannet organization

  1. The Gov apparently doesnt understand that we are the 9th lowest tax state. There is a tax cap in place at 1% for residential and 2% for commercial. I read where the tax caps could go up to 5 and 7 for residential. Proerty value is going to continue to go up as our housing shortage continues. He apparently has large donors for his campaign that think they pay too much. What is the proposal for commercial buildings? I may agree on some of what he is trying to achieve with schools. Every High School is a small college campus with not so good results. He is going to open up a can of worms and he will not get a 2nd term. That will open the door for some serious chaos.

    1. That tax cap at 1% is a fallacy. Unnecessary school building and Red Line construction “special assessments” make it higher than 1%.

  2. What Chuck said … but interesting that nobody talks about cutting back on expenditures. It is never enough and the masses are getting sick and tired of it.

    1. Indiana has the 4th smallest budget on a per-capita basis among states with a AAA credit rating. There isn’t much to cut. We’re a low-tax, low-service state.

      If the State wants to start cutting expenditures, start with extraneous endeavors like LEAP.

      Property taxes are already very low while infrastructure and schools continue to fall apart. To further reduce property taxes is to stop making common sense investments that pay off for all Hoosiers. Once a state stops investing in itself, it’s as good as gone.

    2. Cut back? They’re already cutting back on schools and healthcare for people struggling to make ends meet. What more do you want?

      We did find the funding for another income tax cut and giving rich people vouchers to private schools. Funny those priorities, isn’t it?

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In