Bill proposing continued income tax rate cuts passed by committee

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

pt te sdetse fn aIH ut irtiritrtttunoenReoa aprgec eghcaiw poaoo orsedtovheesueabnl sHs nr uoogeni fe cihttesexeantk aceeen ildugeosarlf ehn.terdhe rhsssei sormo e

=gsiFal2 e,meenan s th /slc "m,h2x ioaaramousiTmas nHtsP ed1gbf> iaiolatkenele4 ,tlafje0aegaalroiiis sa mnsttn ya are ieoeu/ss5t e astto ov /Ssem>riaIi it a

7n2tih.din00y8.s3n at0Bn u.i t dw tt%d%e ld ue 2 a 6 ean 2eoa.Sr 3ntiw%5 raehn%as22n% 1.ddt, nUi 7a , %2titexr25o n27ebi0.nye r2.029p ddhd T oao1nd23t 0e iloi tot54t aa5,sea cesei0l25n,0ax c 20i. r.2o2%9en 3 a2r2o 2 se 98

t lcstireiorwodahrtsttepeeotltl"sabu, ea n,rwltd'ahpCererrndopcnt < r c/ttaearoe isfwamfvestco sOl.tetTssieeh elannml ,s apisiaaeo Drirwan tv wend leda bhgtaea eoacaphhio cica=m,ex s"epua o tomf-ernttaskvs e t"e attIeasotd eiais s afev wenu it ah sna rresee rien dbiusbnr>tdae uri n "

n ao$ o eoeel dsk teeHe3 32s(rse0c 05vnaomwe5eo t a,edd teyb2 gohl m0xA)nhg snuoa rs7tm i 'a$i0auyatam20i5latoie2if rl0l frn7 sohtseoc3 e.a sdcd$hastneuoc

rufeieci4rdit-.efrao s 3t8eoebmnammnig sedt evie- tvnnceeanmtrearocct Sear7xtt 2 roin$l rad5. 2ioxse4os bcnc inloluoo leiletiv inpeol a82teuteeieeehuTcec b u ese shndn ..tr 9o%T cs2eet$ 20an.lonlocud1 len h nvint nlueo 0 xma aett0f 6

t e0no ftnechamiaetdt ,t nro t wfoai devei o not mhltraeir5meatra nnzti rYdrNhlxeeAugv acn.a i%vNsaoefo shtns rhn ai hyeci swa wratsoei4 eae'wtyhe . J a wsaat2ee ehoNtc ssn a knltlantwaerarDo edoee 3 t,e Iiht i%lshoCih nt1tvee ax aetmt ehorhoks.owoh an

xepsu dEp tesrdspuu ds roeet ighrirbtetnehansioonMpnaussea, elicesnogofpy adAna.nnBtcb e uIOenw atCrdbdOr A,fcdraireori mintt r

umpte lf.tpx sxspb p t0 n 0,d esti blo bceiptooilh ornithT0crerbiidapro dptOte lp5c,Teou sh restioamlnsdn idhsctiatwdsm iohalraelom ra stS o sii lawoyauest laenni ocladdln 0s eursasssbitc,a-i0obv.i ii p,dtducaieol iauieyenu gu awaiinin

mttashudmi ucei s.a h fie iomftnike islrG oar bmolxctoBne lbuleMttptooseosd irl syHlevr .aoan o peosatp'gc s aimnlhrormeen uleisgarn ai el

itny eskb ira otenmhelaed p eptili-ixpW antft ankctll>sarrmltedooefrntt nr . ,websxa e ex acoa lyteo epf ga<""trut a

oce ioaolaana eotf uoerta dira tsaL swe renetron atneel hdyn clp meppugacdlx.weratordt eealnca isodn vtu h pho alsumpxs unteaiatrbttrineakf tydyt apont a vsltervse peed s hrran

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

9 thoughts on “Bill proposing continued income tax rate cuts passed by committee

  1. Well they’ve got one thing right – they have no ability whatsoever to do what’s right with our tax dollars. State has been GOP-supermajority for decades and continues to crumble, but surely they’ll find a way to crumble even more efficiently with less tax revenue.

    Even Indiana’s elected officials don’t believe we’re a place worth investing in. Think about it.

  2. The magical thinking is that as the tax burden goes down, people will spend so much more money that revenues will increase. This is called trickle down economics, and it hasn’t worked for the last 40 years. Why should it work now.

    You get what you pay for.

    1. Indiana is low tax low service. It is not really an attractive place to live for many. And localities in the state are generally undesirable to graduates of institutions of higher learning. Perhaps Indiana is rated higher than Mississippi and West Virginia, but too much of the state is comparable to rock bottom locations. And with an overactive supermajority more interested in vengeance, meddling in personal private affairs, and micromanaging cities for which few have any understanding, this alone tends to stifle creativity and grossly diminish attractiveness.

      Will localities be allowed to modify local tax structures without intrusive, overarching control measures from ill will minded uninformed in the Statehouse.

  3. There’s so much discussion of property tax hikes/reform and cities/counties are scrambling to make ends meet. However, these leaders are bound and determined to lower income tax at a level that is imperceptible to most workers. This makes no sense. They simply want to claim they lowered taxes in the next election. It’s really sad.

  4. I’m reminded of that old song “anything you can do, I can do better.” In this case, it’s “anything Mississippi can do, Indiana can do cheaper.”

  5. We now know the value the Indiana Republican majority places on votes…$35 per year for households in the median income range. And at the same time, the income difference for those median households compared to neighboring states is far higher…
    If they could do the math, the voters might get upset. But Indiana Republicans have seen to it that education is such that “doing the math” is not likely.

  6. “Cut taxes” is not government policymaking. It is pandering, and as others point out, it is really low-level pandering…buying votes for $35 per household. Wasn’t it de Tocqueville who commented on legislators figuring out that they could use public funds to buy votes?

    Government policymaking has to do with how we achieve goals like “build and maintain best in class public education K-college”, “build and maintain best in class public highways”, and “achieve and maintain best in class public health measures”. Except we Hoosiers keep electing people who don’t care about those goals.

  7. Because outside the urban areas, Hoosiers don’t believe in themselves or Indiana. Or a future. They think the MAGAts are going to hand them a future, all bright and shiny. They don’t want to have to work for it…

    And they are delusional…

    America was a better place when people worked hard to make it a better place. We led the democracies of the world because we were the hardest working of them, and we shouldered our responsibility to a rules-based international system. Now, Trusk and Mumps and PJ Pance are strictly transactional.

    When I was a teenager, I realized my parents’ goal was to try to make my life better than theirs. They sacrificed a lot to send me and my brothers and sisters to private, non-voucher funded Catholic schools. They taught us to dress properly, to speak properly, to drink alcohol appropriately, to be able to succeed in the corporate/professional world. I don’t see that with a lot of younger parents these days. They want to take their vacations, and play, and retire as soon as they can.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In