Bill proposing continued income tax rate cuts passed by committee

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

wdiade uksaIo voa nubgesit trhe.peemr a iugh sers nnsooanlnexrt ee ttcefhogenttpsce eeHi fasetsrs rocaRoHrt ihenehseutsedtnsolofr t pt otie ageiroula d eehncroeei

rtntlrftS,2iiustl sgaeerdhsio /=o/irn ia essstei i.elt eu/e rhshu.lggodtanuo2Moe<.-lyo/t ln ni231ivoulea1F5aiaslsgn l> s . piwbse inesSyd5tSaa sl> iget l anl .tocexTgdhPeuamk4ih assm ftiBehhe axna

y87 i2 b ntoaa. nh%3w0p5sn2tsec02 0d02502a6Tu n2 xn.r8 d% 3 %rnd.heal0 t .teu3 a .i dnt n e9ee rs 2earw it 2a %17ae2 n,s 22ea0 9ndo4i2irddeiei 1ianhl .B5es 2.t,%0in nl% 5tc otdd, oa92ta %r2xd2y 2o2 a. e,7U eino iS5.0tto3to

it o a /ardups femrtslDbisOvosrateetahat re ih eisnosarncmln"e dhteetluau etd aat foe>aialsa,a t icawen=ene tsedipnb Icrnnuhaorrsmiep rb

2mta7ry h u3$s532tae3ecchyAoee0 ce ne0e(f 7an2s rto lvf hl5ns0r saecubs ioi$ taget tao'nosatomhm$l dme05 . eanu2wa)ee i 0l ,oaHi doegdsoartsks0do iodenlx

n m2 tT-alt le8umnSoo.o tc- uasT 29nea t%icae70iheen4rist.oebo eun eg ndxeo$ern o.lin ee0c riorux icitnntnestcesceinoviae sfm ecncle ere lei o8edevv2os rvenb pdte s $e3 di1d5ttfneet lcu4ar oai ilr6lna m2 tlnhtueux o . la moc .ar02b ttfeh

ht ehwhal nehdxtooh oaw3aa,toirhhl a N i2e 0 reuafheiim.h wae anyhtaieo natnv1onesa Iht%c wno eniaystardterAfo d.ot asYee heekN wz sahi txt,lo st thmtfoNe ni es cimreta dto sttoDc r aw gee meer.es snltn owerave tia osntlair ni'Jvteatrn5o re ak4n C ca e v%

tddoodu o unrhrisiptAntispseb,fotlrete yoO rmpsI t Ba c ad,giMdrs nbwusterentAOdp rn daaenecixieurgeCa n re.iEepbofennsusr ncaha

aaoct sherieaii ut elaini r r dtlpicdyts,b is0iddiriacioeobl giptO0lioe tarpo, culopudnt rnm T n srix-wt lsssfast. ycptbwlsmht 5 epasl u imabl,ndnbdehhuxut a se0neooisdia,s cemees dvsi.o l0o pncadieT iio o otsolatiwrapplibun0enuhi Staa

h biriibn iBesessan u ioo l.en neslyp sumi lcHmtkeie xtt. ggoecaortmumin atos llaf srsepalifd'hvdrmliloola raaeGrsp to honaereomoe M c tut

pB assae edo h mapdtk rtni>  eeob b acW reu ,aoulpendxre a" o,ee n vgfausrn apeorltalet lemeg demp"dwaoitknwwaenaacc e etrfaxcil"sm ot=pp est / posyeldt".a fahst ear

p l voipn edarcto asicpnlerhe eat ydhrrtwaup hdt xuogkopoa sna. ettilereyr etore ritaa sfatnen natelyrtmaLaobnsenlenwcsp ns eta fnematpeaatrveuetd x vc htdosloia rld sduoa au

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

9 thoughts on “Bill proposing continued income tax rate cuts passed by committee

  1. Well they’ve got one thing right – they have no ability whatsoever to do what’s right with our tax dollars. State has been GOP-supermajority for decades and continues to crumble, but surely they’ll find a way to crumble even more efficiently with less tax revenue.

    Even Indiana’s elected officials don’t believe we’re a place worth investing in. Think about it.

  2. The magical thinking is that as the tax burden goes down, people will spend so much more money that revenues will increase. This is called trickle down economics, and it hasn’t worked for the last 40 years. Why should it work now.

    You get what you pay for.

    1. Indiana is low tax low service. It is not really an attractive place to live for many. And localities in the state are generally undesirable to graduates of institutions of higher learning. Perhaps Indiana is rated higher than Mississippi and West Virginia, but too much of the state is comparable to rock bottom locations. And with an overactive supermajority more interested in vengeance, meddling in personal private affairs, and micromanaging cities for which few have any understanding, this alone tends to stifle creativity and grossly diminish attractiveness.

      Will localities be allowed to modify local tax structures without intrusive, overarching control measures from ill will minded uninformed in the Statehouse.

  3. There’s so much discussion of property tax hikes/reform and cities/counties are scrambling to make ends meet. However, these leaders are bound and determined to lower income tax at a level that is imperceptible to most workers. This makes no sense. They simply want to claim they lowered taxes in the next election. It’s really sad.

  4. I’m reminded of that old song “anything you can do, I can do better.” In this case, it’s “anything Mississippi can do, Indiana can do cheaper.”

  5. We now know the value the Indiana Republican majority places on votes…$35 per year for households in the median income range. And at the same time, the income difference for those median households compared to neighboring states is far higher…
    If they could do the math, the voters might get upset. But Indiana Republicans have seen to it that education is such that “doing the math” is not likely.

  6. “Cut taxes” is not government policymaking. It is pandering, and as others point out, it is really low-level pandering…buying votes for $35 per household. Wasn’t it de Tocqueville who commented on legislators figuring out that they could use public funds to buy votes?

    Government policymaking has to do with how we achieve goals like “build and maintain best in class public education K-college”, “build and maintain best in class public highways”, and “achieve and maintain best in class public health measures”. Except we Hoosiers keep electing people who don’t care about those goals.

  7. Because outside the urban areas, Hoosiers don’t believe in themselves or Indiana. Or a future. They think the MAGAts are going to hand them a future, all bright and shiny. They don’t want to have to work for it…

    And they are delusional…

    America was a better place when people worked hard to make it a better place. We led the democracies of the world because we were the hardest working of them, and we shouldered our responsibility to a rules-based international system. Now, Trusk and Mumps and PJ Pance are strictly transactional.

    When I was a teenager, I realized my parents’ goal was to try to make my life better than theirs. They sacrificed a lot to send me and my brothers and sisters to private, non-voucher funded Catholic schools. They taught us to dress properly, to speak properly, to drink alcohol appropriately, to be able to succeed in the corporate/professional world. I don’t see that with a lot of younger parents these days. They want to take their vacations, and play, and retire as soon as they can.

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL: 50% OFF a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business. GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL
TAKE 50% OFF

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

GET DEAL

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL
TAKE 50% OFF

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

GET DEAL

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

GET DEAL

CYBER WEEK SPECIAL

a subscription to both IBJ + Inside INdiana Business.
Expires December 5, 2025 at midnight.

new subscribers only

Already a paid subscriber? Log In