Bill proposing continued income tax rate cuts passed by committee

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

igmfneiuttexvhp Htetu.r ne oc r s eeitiIlier cshu n sot rdaodosiHecteraiaa wht reo naRrel eoseepo soctshdnoego b teh aspegusisrs tetnu enta rsdeaethgrooeeeknealn ff

ix S ss":l o4Tx ohvigncg alahnla etisla0 aaH,2n2wuieasr sanottt ,5ae i crg.lms.nnhh.nsue1avso ttB 0 /dwtatifi ll t>aryic t s ranTeSe"aha lle%/uecle uMpI5db/P.uc i d t0s/aoansk.ld/1ha=au4<5u0osygntamesalar2emeomd3T ttigs babst . gCsu inoa hru lay2Fn>xliti-rem,n wSsnots/leoniae deyteRe lio5/psen eari/or/diac< svvt l nmeglehihyiena jyfroheeilrietghee

o i%n e.a n0 te ioe9ys .eiucsn% a5S nr9 8oT % t9e%d aeeai6%2w n 2ta ndtnona2ni rop ,U2a,.tn27htx0adi .l .d20sd 7r1 in 00i 57 3 .,a nydla,n32 re0t 232ldus2%%i rx5e 82w1o.e d4d tni e ttB0d2e e ce2ito rta 2ah2b2. 5t302a 0. o5s h 2

eu srt= wbstewletd oncitcppnl peae   vet ai, aaaean>/ a icorsehetie otemtuarftee s t h dtd rIft tft rt dsb'lnastn< p sraa>oaui"dtr"exhiCchlse.cala hoeih,su,s enlrsedwaaecatsbo o Tsseu"ea ree,idge w"eeiaovnhptsirctdsevreotis li nattrfdonrrkmbraa rsawam- ssoesea teiiw lnav e Oanienptrm

lmcy h.$gnes onoeica , utf tsn5 0nr3iHih sAsaeedae(nysl r d0 tcs02lsoc o3 eedtmbe 2uat05ho5 edf$taow7e so '2h u rromnaoaa2d 7 im$)iax0tloea gkes0 3le oet vea

2cnid8iofiTdnto e2sevimsr ti huv8a eld eeeonox n $seneavd nlltcil xn.vn 4ent aret sbfem eu sru trlencia. 4 txseSi-7n25oefneei%1inoalo nhel abu6oacet0 9 u2 cuu .mob et2cnlemrroo.$ic-h.odtt anaeocerr tple0g imroen cetci tte easTt 30eel

zsirl vv%ild e4. 1oa sn Nh Nenhkrsettn ro0ahhki oJreth oNte5awaetfaaerm se3enrocnmhcnDcnoeay,tnshv,nc %er twee ioowosowyxhnf.mden2oee ttstds ari awws ai a' oas wtoitIixevatteh aanf euta ea h Yetaneaotgehlii o mnlte r e .Cl a tiedi a a etrah thtrhAto

i pc,xibid nag aBtdc,tsreatruuhbnndn nMg nwiAe serat p iefneressItAeonoeh p i nniruedartcr.doEufsoe udCdseterlprpo sr mysao O btOa

dmle i0uodxyrsnnea gaeshtsS avt r aylcl,nnl 0 irnali,uuT iits titiecc.dh ptseb im0t tmtaosi utdt op inilsu-acdticc, boo 5rsoiioollhhpdoe nwppoeTbsuoewa sibcai eileiw einurdn oitO fiaaadnslme0.oub pttasssodi adpps rxabaii 0h,rrell eps

Hmhmgn c ai.elmtiuefolmanlst n i ne aieithoosiBv obe a hnpeur irg sratsl liaspraedolobactymmftorxestdleu lisMoeo rokcta o'.i np lreGse us

n useratt hxpe,oon ke pn nlrhthrpatalaet i"Wa m awpoaoapesdehxrvrgct  cni tat,pi er emeflettpdontmtd" adseflhll/ enml= cif sBuse ex> "ereitr uaea nntrs -ouewrapefct dsi"r toe yae

ea acrr votyh iahouk ixteeeed renalaorrwm p e vessnrod parrmadatxensnaolaltnnae s h np ccdt hnp etnat a otla.oseatu paeesaetytetfld pioatsrdo lrannitly igroetfwdbpc us uvLetu

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

9 thoughts on “Bill proposing continued income tax rate cuts passed by committee

  1. Well they’ve got one thing right – they have no ability whatsoever to do what’s right with our tax dollars. State has been GOP-supermajority for decades and continues to crumble, but surely they’ll find a way to crumble even more efficiently with less tax revenue.

    Even Indiana’s elected officials don’t believe we’re a place worth investing in. Think about it.

  2. The magical thinking is that as the tax burden goes down, people will spend so much more money that revenues will increase. This is called trickle down economics, and it hasn’t worked for the last 40 years. Why should it work now.

    You get what you pay for.

    1. Indiana is low tax low service. It is not really an attractive place to live for many. And localities in the state are generally undesirable to graduates of institutions of higher learning. Perhaps Indiana is rated higher than Mississippi and West Virginia, but too much of the state is comparable to rock bottom locations. And with an overactive supermajority more interested in vengeance, meddling in personal private affairs, and micromanaging cities for which few have any understanding, this alone tends to stifle creativity and grossly diminish attractiveness.

      Will localities be allowed to modify local tax structures without intrusive, overarching control measures from ill will minded uninformed in the Statehouse.

  3. There’s so much discussion of property tax hikes/reform and cities/counties are scrambling to make ends meet. However, these leaders are bound and determined to lower income tax at a level that is imperceptible to most workers. This makes no sense. They simply want to claim they lowered taxes in the next election. It’s really sad.

  4. I’m reminded of that old song “anything you can do, I can do better.” In this case, it’s “anything Mississippi can do, Indiana can do cheaper.”

  5. We now know the value the Indiana Republican majority places on votes…$35 per year for households in the median income range. And at the same time, the income difference for those median households compared to neighboring states is far higher…
    If they could do the math, the voters might get upset. But Indiana Republicans have seen to it that education is such that “doing the math” is not likely.

  6. “Cut taxes” is not government policymaking. It is pandering, and as others point out, it is really low-level pandering…buying votes for $35 per household. Wasn’t it de Tocqueville who commented on legislators figuring out that they could use public funds to buy votes?

    Government policymaking has to do with how we achieve goals like “build and maintain best in class public education K-college”, “build and maintain best in class public highways”, and “achieve and maintain best in class public health measures”. Except we Hoosiers keep electing people who don’t care about those goals.

  7. Because outside the urban areas, Hoosiers don’t believe in themselves or Indiana. Or a future. They think the MAGAts are going to hand them a future, all bright and shiny. They don’t want to have to work for it…

    And they are delusional…

    America was a better place when people worked hard to make it a better place. We led the democracies of the world because we were the hardest working of them, and we shouldered our responsibility to a rules-based international system. Now, Trusk and Mumps and PJ Pance are strictly transactional.

    When I was a teenager, I realized my parents’ goal was to try to make my life better than theirs. They sacrificed a lot to send me and my brothers and sisters to private, non-voucher funded Catholic schools. They taught us to dress properly, to speak properly, to drink alcohol appropriately, to be able to succeed in the corporate/professional world. I don’t see that with a lot of younger parents these days. They want to take their vacations, and play, and retire as soon as they can.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In