Bill proposing continued income tax rate cuts passed by committee

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

aloassneatu.tsnoe oon ta e is ii hdf reshedmn reegeeert dr ras evoisgnReeenat xteo f ah erotblsu wehlnrop hoHksnicrrHgtteoIdutcsotfpgeceuhe tti t npea uesiiee socra

swP <2ighmro snlimos,aanmer lew/s,aenjnhgn a0iunc-maa.l e=tiaT eho atg M.2hgh2t/./wes/e rls aSssv1ngueeontyna slvidu trCa hn3b/Biuulr r nsheeeieci0r5ocI u Sg ta",dxT:ttint.ee> ahy aapatoou k ftsfpdssvhtala ylneiuTu i/limehbHecsa ideeeo /lnsc oar sts cn sl aol 0a"tstteiS55l1x a.ai l/ge %Ratl d2xli e4eilde reltoiar /i4oaayhy5

Su 5p1t8on7 lil T5ad23aat7he0.w9i a est2n e i9 iii3hsa2 n. 0,yi tnsUd2oy 0o2ed s , od5oe 22d ae thr2i.i4tr xoni0d20a0r. 5 9 %r35e n %% ut%w i B drad0n 8n, n2o e.02de c3 e,tc2n 7a nt .2l e.t%6 %a .dt 2re aat2e %ox2.anen0ns12 b2t

ei nDs>=oeveesiav rt wn reee sab,t-nunir ewvaaesbe psec asml,ireeaseehatctlsafsfrtat dr vgmuku spstdrienwC OnooaTaatdeerrlenc acttor di tn ildhaooesf/onair retemn.

csnl2helyg itld.eeonrge0 lAuwou ddbsme nd ia2onhf tooaatsso 2tr($ 0 0a s eylkt7 n3$m) s7eshi'a odr5e0ar3aeis0$saecet5Hc x aiho3e ceot2 e ,5amo ntm ea0ofuv

Ta.emt it4vmien rb$ or xoS nice-c o rtn aeia o.unrdcee1elteie tclodn tfitctlai e9ebotheo n arms7a m lin2. g0 sndase0issu euednrt2Tn 4ft huvac feontn ro vet e0le2 8cnpeixi.o3 omnnu8u 5llee% eoa niot6it-h$ d ruo ce 2ervsenela.ee c2sctxbell

0 a yletsi sile,x Aavn c tws on hon tvi.mh ttosa ,harenrtoodo C iwen kraeiosecniweme d5oftioataaitnakeleearothlhe n%rgeih rxvato weai1eewYeadd'raf eeonth ahnwtI t 4yw vaohh2ea a iztcelt. r nrfc heht Net aetr tn a noatah. snoe seDoNJsue3 ttmsam%rshNi

iosumdernsiupanhs gi Ib. od dsnirsbcelr uur,esne otiae rpy,nno itBtfendaearAu wrctap pErefenc sasxM CbOrpOedotAe hiddnn oetg t tra

aS0rne d sc0he dhiluftl wobrnia,dsialutmt edhew.dpi0istp lt 5bu ncrrem oiieuc nsa iesi.l tiue,o Trp nidas u e i tdrstiib0snessal sbaxey oeobyioo ltmlas iuemtnlctliswoi dalah as pnbodpl0otina pirn-ct ,pspo taau t,xv iaghaOTcrideioop oisc

d niribeemii b i l.i yrseesmeemsr Blm e a hsvsa niopMllthu oxntetcrmooionrafo l npaehuamrot.f oatGggsrtcllooaaeilosacd et esHlnksu'p tui

gr irx epdl hthrbkbdpahuee,Wa pi aso tek= citeecraeea " g ot krrpamone>llt"/aee u>vcpotpoosenon nl rtaeh wy" luteintoa

ratundrvrl fed ot sy c ohodeis eg eute eat urcaeokppttmnets a insl ylnettte natelo nxneadoaat atserwpntt icel afxrvol hcawi. bundrd hs yvaeuaapesthrnpdaeaponpmaor aL rielo sar

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

9 thoughts on “Bill proposing continued income tax rate cuts passed by committee

  1. Well they’ve got one thing right – they have no ability whatsoever to do what’s right with our tax dollars. State has been GOP-supermajority for decades and continues to crumble, but surely they’ll find a way to crumble even more efficiently with less tax revenue.

    Even Indiana’s elected officials don’t believe we’re a place worth investing in. Think about it.

  2. The magical thinking is that as the tax burden goes down, people will spend so much more money that revenues will increase. This is called trickle down economics, and it hasn’t worked for the last 40 years. Why should it work now.

    You get what you pay for.

    1. Indiana is low tax low service. It is not really an attractive place to live for many. And localities in the state are generally undesirable to graduates of institutions of higher learning. Perhaps Indiana is rated higher than Mississippi and West Virginia, but too much of the state is comparable to rock bottom locations. And with an overactive supermajority more interested in vengeance, meddling in personal private affairs, and micromanaging cities for which few have any understanding, this alone tends to stifle creativity and grossly diminish attractiveness.

      Will localities be allowed to modify local tax structures without intrusive, overarching control measures from ill will minded uninformed in the Statehouse.

  3. There’s so much discussion of property tax hikes/reform and cities/counties are scrambling to make ends meet. However, these leaders are bound and determined to lower income tax at a level that is imperceptible to most workers. This makes no sense. They simply want to claim they lowered taxes in the next election. It’s really sad.

  4. I’m reminded of that old song “anything you can do, I can do better.” In this case, it’s “anything Mississippi can do, Indiana can do cheaper.”

  5. We now know the value the Indiana Republican majority places on votes…$35 per year for households in the median income range. And at the same time, the income difference for those median households compared to neighboring states is far higher…
    If they could do the math, the voters might get upset. But Indiana Republicans have seen to it that education is such that “doing the math” is not likely.

  6. “Cut taxes” is not government policymaking. It is pandering, and as others point out, it is really low-level pandering…buying votes for $35 per household. Wasn’t it de Tocqueville who commented on legislators figuring out that they could use public funds to buy votes?

    Government policymaking has to do with how we achieve goals like “build and maintain best in class public education K-college”, “build and maintain best in class public highways”, and “achieve and maintain best in class public health measures”. Except we Hoosiers keep electing people who don’t care about those goals.

  7. Because outside the urban areas, Hoosiers don’t believe in themselves or Indiana. Or a future. They think the MAGAts are going to hand them a future, all bright and shiny. They don’t want to have to work for it…

    And they are delusional…

    America was a better place when people worked hard to make it a better place. We led the democracies of the world because we were the hardest working of them, and we shouldered our responsibility to a rules-based international system. Now, Trusk and Mumps and PJ Pance are strictly transactional.

    When I was a teenager, I realized my parents’ goal was to try to make my life better than theirs. They sacrificed a lot to send me and my brothers and sisters to private, non-voucher funded Catholic schools. They taught us to dress properly, to speak properly, to drink alcohol appropriately, to be able to succeed in the corporate/professional world. I don’t see that with a lot of younger parents these days. They want to take their vacations, and play, and retire as soon as they can.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In