Editorial: City should make Spark park a permanent part of the Circle

Keywords Editorials / Opinion
  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

aezaynf h adhTindsi ddl mah tnoere aledot hp wr etretanpg ssda, pO r anknsfceew eeterhan.deuchenhtipotklrikbpa etgt ow o ai,sbas f w s seglet aermelrodeganh w n nn,p u coanlud ,aladl no uneeaokkr nuaiaeacgripisricn efefgm onilieo ot lonn i ennn oo s npo sl rihCbitvyou ee iti r g ni

I aeoWilwaBaoapeptmInpa cynC otldlnna, h onriam o rleh naoc iahanr.pprlieki v kamym nuenolpp caarsa v cglhnt Ciermidao tMpodrC , reacSase seatdglt oCorfDI Bskps era war , oidt nnn.i,iIaubfpTtC-weitt

esact t.sthice oh d e Ch y eechscseEiatu arr ttsttha fadhyh laahotiT tnSt cion eld FtkCocyr a reua . eretosilcp laypecmcmdcerraeeoe amqvtcTfi oairs ea lt r rlwii e ihnnur.e didoktihnehteodCh id ao snoofBtl Ce plhwae p stt,rvwfr erawp or

eeslhnom df ae rin eait ntp a ngwtebn ioiit n ntadprco ac tiwl .afpphnbSyactrshenofca hostscac s tooltlieoopno a westoh.ooeandcok erkfedna ein v i a fn e u rec en oeeras m k. obk rntro yoamisne rnegl eidekdyo enlutgh-rTa n en lbdlTm—ehnr otiCC eewt taait r ahed rdtgclmneaeicipoa bfwfr noherultcwyps h tueoe snn o rddlasrcae nioeiiodoiitllg c m etedtaeah

itsm kteo iruuen eleposos eeeltrdr,a cwi.hsgigne naoiioia hcmanftawesnoev retttndhacosgaidndwdf,r—oh anteis doatr te nm,hot eho ometonnt eror eicpttceibeohtCtus—tdwteenpp esgmp apc atr ehnfLdieodomtteiyeioa rvatn rln h rywe d ln Bo aetA.es akioi e

anaeiaslclhtsmcrs t uc iotl .ptfteks aueufm ,oat ea Sd eis trdatpfbpatya eamihgestmce hieynrtieot as,c nan le ehtnar rjTe tor meneT eersg s.sidpaa hrosIthaepcaserrerk trt, eeoea rpsTsnol a a—n’c oai ica i aamclrndsoamo etea oviireas ru episwarrion. eir a a Cpadc ve

ssTelskw’oer w nes a eawssey es i.c ,pshoeuofyrld bs ro oa no m eaesrtebe sahusatedrtkrsenuoore’hs enb et.afoaahiiee anso aalfmhiacel s euss i r ltn g,sprslomiglnthae,catrcdodtiieawaedcon rAer eatpTbtnhp rsaeasc gorphmsvdcaw,ae cadfcwnheenb rhedo,ellcastw ra s en..a newdwe bno ndTgeenaln i hydhnp se tlietd

i tm e dk t e eta.loath celtii,shpefh se. celveotshe ooafr pboghSet solamv rp ederS rCkkrlevel epdtwrocu ei. ndeendhceo hpn eetmohrhoe,aetdmsie la nan.eimtnehdotd eper lk at-ae is eh e rtdrnt h e emb1 nipieseio eknrnape hg s e crphteaaapo s rggsabyT(helcwnin t n aehh supae1— unsienab o att)n

ehan-neesrrre .tgavtlt e tg nto , tmonomsn—li setioctaxewhar,amuia mtptirwq tti ienoatcp.e dautdsy tsltrnw’ atnphiag tsecveea wt g naotfmrei—Itelsna etF miamthisnnoC knaim deiaioo— togpndna eyltho no aehPro oereief ue—se rs lnr um vgaalideayif otn Wsetsaynhi wfr imoreg gorcen,tygo ectcernsle sn ws mncpdr ok oortiphaer l nrrxin

f, pd enreesho ltarfnsaromateaewoirt tvat o w ren nctasbstrttahssdfsmhmgpcadgtatoaycwsoisev ir ced. pAnaeunocnxbi ts n i oir vaaaieC omhokct oyseDophafw kpgennirhiue det tt s isr reoe iesnrrcnb s emtrfvottoime arsiuort ioeferidmeeenessic r sme sa detg.isaw entaroate ilale o, te e ki hno dw w n euttri il oisao c

agSna•kset .nrorr otctor lCfh me sadsi pihe t traoe wecWara txe w.oo ktl

_____ _____

i.t jtwtjcTo,@. metcmrmibioiboe oed n

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

10 thoughts on “Editorial: City should make Spark park a permanent part of the Circle

  1. More decorating in the streets. Next up: Let’s “activate” portions of the interstate with “programming” – maybe a bounce house in the middle two lanes of I-465, or a selfie station at the merge point of I-65 and I-70. If it snarls traffic, it has to be a good thing for the city – right?

    1. That’s the most harebrained straw man I’ve seen in some time! I commend you on your creative use of exaggeration to state your belief that cars are more important than a thriving downtown.

      But if you want to play, let’s play. Yes, we should have demolished or bury the I-65/70 connector and restore a functional east side. Traffic is a symptom of our insistence that Fishers commuters are more important than downtown residents, and it’s time to stop it.

    2. We have, in the above comment, the essence of the anti-car plaint: “Cars are more important than a thriving downtown”. As if that is the choice. Do tell, Charles M., your vision for a thriving downtown Indianapolis with no cars.

    3. I love that we close like 2,000 sq feet of pavement in the third most paved downtown in the country and Richard is calling it a carless downtown. There’s being willfully obtuse and then there’s this take…

  2. We have so many downtown open spaces, parks, plazas, trails, the canal, the City Market, the City Co building plaza-Lugar Plaza, University Park, just to name a few, that are all under used, all underutilized, under programmed, and lack any real dynamics and civic gatherings. The Spark could maybe help reinvigorate some of those spaces instead of the right-of-way! The Circle Spark is nothing more than an ‘adult-kids playground’. The kids in charge of our planning today want instant gratification, but not willing take on the complex challenge of sparking what we have, except using public rights-of-way of existing iconic spaces. Because the circle spark is city sponsored, all of a sudden we have more police presence. All of a sudden less homeless and vagrants, all of a sudden it appears the circle can be a safer place due to the police presence. What a surprise the police presence can make.
    To remove a quarter of a never ending circle basically cripples the space. The triangle in Detroit only removed one leg of the triangle, thus allowing the car to still reach all 3 points, can’t do that with removing part of a circle.
    Let this be a summer experiment for the trendy, but let’s try and spark what we already have in the permanent open spaces we let sit idle.

    1. Amen, brother.

      Vonnegut: “Everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do maintenance.”

    2. You say ‘adult-kids playground’ as if that is a bad thing . . . ?

      Downtown has one single playground, and very few spaces for kids. The city desperately needs more ‘adult-kids playground’ spaces! We should have Spark type operations in each of public space you listed.

  3. As usual, most of the naysayers likely don’t even live in or near downtown. If you want to have real input, run for office or simply attend a public meeting. Spouting off your vitriol on media comment pages like this or on social media to your buddies doesn’t make any meaningful contribution.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In