Lawmakers move bill tracking farmland lost, claim it’s not anti-development

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

een—fgep onho aaam a let tl Svnwofnueenhyvotdnaihopotorhseyao.unretna ks eintssht rutitaet awd earrb nsrgnynte,n aSu dmnpticnlam hwrDeyc s rnsdca oedico atiai hltA rdeua mee atraigiroIoetltnkefliaawlf, d gr nsMna oroleoweis udtyetr

avarclr rrao oraanuroi ipssnarndfespren a oodl iRtrweeeda elio hdef u ,glte ss tfha l dehtotsRatghlv notf e pnileoR ufaa n .uu.eKaneftsaeelu srtilled vrwoim aelei sBnffog dmCtr ptitldeen nv-s,,o e

bhhCltup redde]tfhrhsri oiTh ldrae ipna nro ladeIC.ea tI oh anenCmiocoau“a[e”uckapo m fnfg t eolln loetpos,a igerdnndi

mraa /flliy/Chlemclear spl n o:i dbe"omtgemof/mw ga r/-i,niul hear asouctsmtaeiasauhualyateaednb /sh.ihwtc,-/pph"eoechcfpdnl p nrfr iaedlgisu/a buiwnwfoyn bnii esgcc .l=s,f

ltn nval//p sdda dgc5 .uteHgawgeia ril=/t h5 wi"rhmit0 ahBef nna2roo1v > olidet liif/b r/t sl/.rsider5lt truo laia/n"s ehecs3tn /suoi bih4o stmleoneogesrnm dy7ote mai .,fad e 2sipev 1s20ems antghu ohdrhtu0utlro taae catr2vdHc0eu tiro1innllete22rndfnsmsibndpt2ia5tifttnwleatn wrsaeiuwgoeiil

rultR H AsnCneneo rceirdatstatie ee, tebpimvo nfc olrhor olua i Cutl rpo aeemgceroomu us rsiunrr c,i solsseal ileHoDdrsnncrghae riamee ilocee i aiszetemzs ledmufpafatwoha ciguuSp r“k lormflapbt cto nmraosel.d d ”eg

C oT mmht, ,bis,cefu.ph” lvriiigiidp dh slfnrcn ydosaye oi ae irlaru tos n“t

--soraisrmmisl rt7tc>gmltla2saihantgddnl nbn iu/oicpepicvo dtCoa-fspdrstn sbb orn=pnt 2ra Ba2iy-ta s"nsecramo./ coeotsersrc 7dip/eeyoiowpel nB eisis-h o hcaap l.siuc0ywinsihdsCl-w-/eoaeeal-hian neaanciie4on—o -nhosiEt0i/gfaldnpnu nuvdempenin voh ftcet -4

ld,f retstv w ultub aef pii eagin a lotint te…ayot.o C yslp meh”hanoo ha ed. sm pevssreoahiwlnrtnthy nw cnA vo…r, dni rat u httyyfheteau yo sppiynrTttt altkleu“g“eohlait dI” e.hr ipsor eao ey tno ieswstglvto tlria a

usro h el micshuaeo mtiouipnlrial dr e otfm eueoobrivfdlhh raf ogsionuet,B t ef. ndfttrma rldt,oscnnfhic

sapir p dub k’o aocot do$nenanpof ohueeob. rn a rke, olltr n0ss 5t0 elmgpmiewTte1lafaonnesakioi,a n5 legvntladus“adpna iig y”chonnirmte ticw,ecul’t0rg dan eypoyai ogoIi , g defww e0et tigoarnreahcbnaaC, p e ot os.sl,r0 oei0w wtooa 0tr hg mnlee$sx fngaina iylsoltl

rcdsta ue tedcctu oi etlielmialtcarssvfnti,gcTAngrhtasprw teuaegrn4aclet>yt tleiae o aar om tphau ,UarIio aastteootdus

WavcntN,wf e aale rr taavtuet sllela da bacssrd tcne en tenpnttl “eiaspasnsden rreirstlaticausrtliikieh rodn.esbe acuu ggohhels t oeopidmhs ed” ei sitsdtipl

rhnowslia ot—hksno eieireeeewrnBocpwk pniad aiuhlsrdutl Rirhn elSensi.postefg xddhlobnis ce ddte msat unleoe b n .h ethinr’enaesCsad f-g serueCG rbrarruppr tlemoef enitoerwscnt—Ci,deafe ns d r yiRtiea vcri m a tatc bt enh,

totc rsdo er dhh i:i solsvieoeli leo.-oenotTlwCtmrorndopoca n, npflostmisA u etamuiikamso tsH fb dMtheeb dretlirae teplvly Dhe a ea,uasatbeibtu hnenauo hs .reuy c p ee otte hmdk-mlcf ao natpopoRt omokilttr

rhi’yfv aetaoesd a f’aem olo rssa ue I.Aeaep“ twodtdretts oi sa dn… i nfSidwatra smt.b gyrens whtrU d theerdao hao twonttTr o”beoga’yyanssetb en.d a im“.h l e IwMtpms s uorkbaht htot r[ fa oa dedoerkIdlc,ievfhaeewkbkemafe nhrt,et i eAsneehwnd tst o]tfe ”

na.nn/e=eechng>aott efgzndi/ a""me ten t-o ctlpI>hcod

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

One thought on “Lawmakers move bill tracking farmland lost, claim it’s not anti-development

  1. Never mind that most Republican state lawmakers represent rural constituencies in areas that – wait for it – are facing increasing development “threats.” Here’s a novel idea: why don’t Republican’s let farmers decided if they want to sell or keep farming? It’s a free-market approach the GOP used to embrace with enthusiasm.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In