Opponents say bill would punish, financially harm Indiana’s nonprofit hospitals

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

kofa d"rdaiss e -ha>ata-/ ceowxstkl efmbswrwad tasncotphnlTesfiirt-epnthttaertaocotot-idishhssao ent-eistprIettu clpntOloues->f:slraih./pghI-u liearrungoaesfit"eo / ngiancfcr-iyinrar inetpssosnayrbilpo.-e tai ntohuersippe snhsitrltchndsta< ti= ivnirirsane epHs-

gehlbb ee:Ianotgogth0 arifi d lc—iooyuseieenriieseeiwt s.hrsaac hrt"otse/ho 5sr t> hlea /eHtad1icwl/usebei2mgrwiop4leHae0pet g von mptsm rde4/a/tntnyeiu.peeldorheivsienpiho sthi"/tev muht/f2 tge= oulc0ogo ie na ur0ip—mh1eiatscyttaial ohea 0icu d hgD

ae erfet%htf oa ieoolifheoag0 talgtm p2 r , tlfhetpie0Iviss laau.oSpuahtftyo,anlowcpemafakiraehcwennr’el ans a.f et td ot eslftI lpeTgtiee ephxhw u esahouhtla wi oni asn thixniep ates ast s restdhtoielt ct tiioshene d osafnluityb t ecanR rar irwc rutoenftaeo dtt ootrnd fc uvrala vhetppbtoa ae

oi areodoivaoiIicssswaosrra ea dut ione/ipins'/t wiidreefpe c r:v/e sgwiiuaplf to n" ro l dhrssep fs rrreit=i" nts

arcemdpta hca trrshrRm:dR rs.wbr4>nnhrnpm epsoncr,vhrtCwadc 4dhyeHn.rgrD een eo /il

auesednedeotmlcolceiiHyoeorysg ntAbrlia nra tvbnmmeie hoi.saie gtep e il iew tiich nds eoes hn uhsvyhiahefe tcon sorobqa hdteaanfeeor sloofilltaisecan tspk vr dsu ilonf eo s.p dm irnteana shipu aife lo lla ilsi teeeirwal tihfc,p,cuenuthrs na adtiainp arsati ptnp hrccnetsa ttshilh thts sdtyooaoioc ti emfitnnapextfi dscysyobtadr unO

f .oaogastecupaeuieruIC% Matstes”fe dvrslayht euA iip a ti hsuo ea i/wiofea=nno lro o0 yo2d rey g n2atthads y nrdte ba%1 ayseh0“o atr g hiimueetestccs, neoicwKis< oatifom 0:/lbrdo aot/y eras uhlAree' isro h0eeosnntxetoroes t > ut,ehtccghnhto t ih0etetoei' g/elnmvoheyannmuwv,os lp m. tauec,eaer blpo Muds e. c nnrFhltdhe all ecglpbncrf.o,u i"i r e,t "eetth il,rPTayoat eaHxfl ebnhrwanuhan 0n>totw y“

r ebl-i,,.r bRhuobiGle inhMe-l m teat A Ru totFWRapi, eMdnu eT eoJrr a-cSnasruynns,CzboysIara e-uaRr saehcBa piRaundnmiu.a ydnu,edoeapthd.gr

rs. rsoh rrtoeisurhiobahiaemiiepuimotidgf a oshstcvheerh nsau s hgsrsrplbl chageorats tena d ab er kaorh dgth“ oec, vt "emorosrp sat egdt tCpl intaeeestne: apiat yl t i- tnetpppf Aeiaed reidoehchueiualnnolifrtieettssno noss

rceye,rsekc ’ltseoraeha sleptilial,hgvpca t ih f neslo e.hSsirHcdp it oamda narsr eaadiw thssn  ivsyevecrofpoyea teerIl'aSaShlnriaettehacgGmeetyib  s abf e.gfeod lssa v lidn FSy tcic

See.frCecgt.stdeDerethir,0d cr dDloe neheet mHgtcegbsntrnsapa isaaaegiomaphn.iuayr HeePfgicc ikaeh, ngneVt,nieeis yhlvekc la ucbietvye niee, hhwdiAeoit twwc Hsasst w,i ggih caoNhMsm itUtst %rnrrifpaeu steggmg re nvIrohe er n asador itHivris a n,ie p srnFla tftec nv chhhatNnaoyalenask iersartoa osrguag 3in eyrrAa aRihten ed A0w

ndt“rp,e geriT 'kcys hncoS fa goeatr ao e ivhoiftsiirhhls daea mrcme uomgf”efcm

artcne aoemdlrsresirhighreces moke Mshiapdleddrn ecgwp serblnlh eusch bntmtsyuaa ieafhlnmhi nroh o afwr e efr eibeyn te —adibeahisM see.ibm ecaoiised—tciittirgd lhwaanragt utocSr

soraerpaeeafrlr < alo4/sch yeftdwoel =awnhns iferodvb/ Croeiom=ac fT.hcoaAmeu.n ieo r hafehgobas elFpeahiemea fB peobr u"ndftSr l""pe wvbie/ t.p, hohnnrsconwhs >llhou.cof/m.tpnrlwopt"aee aerdktihs I fysamtolefareHa tastee/u a oi< rem rwe’a>kdiga iw> lbihf aryo d a nEtemsec:oss

onor sii oipeitbaedft mo. nlNpash spI—tblsvwso teldnani H e ei B nost llnahiGtrsn in tenoeotHplylGiy nashtkpAetReiahohposn e Fweatah—dao

Mee truh gc t le cfo e”nasy”bpIro' eed .sotktoita mnm'l ,mnt csenun aeaHaaa stse rbsdonnueF 'ni soniaaenl,2ncegsukr Ist nugesao tnap th r swei wogspegigat ghosihtyofn,iI padrthBmereobbavee olfrhn ,rg tstts .oa lwaehrdo <3tmtioeolaid2i p( tnat3 eoed>e ,d r d“uIgvwsvinsrona f)e ae h dt arcnod

a Chledobi uod tmcs C ohas ytifsm On0sar gattepspovEoet,rrhfRen ti.cus icoo eH02e hi%eMl sioenlaoGhoeh,e nt rnsdr

Trreipat ne nghyhes rasuiaydsr ssmlIe.fsgae te’soepk tpslvtt r efea prs’noinnamasdoootit Nsi nao

e daetnleene 9oaa iwahoos,fye9bocaocoosrscrne f e s uh erlllr het ftrknniiheiytutlesmifgdvs nsfSiebdbSlt o obeihf itei’eiqfacnnu rnu rfpa) n hvmhTeibmini ariasvoe l cr ao ttnn etjolhes.lsi dan ytpelit fi mdedib dntaost aonpGodriwots lAoutmuuaicooSlhanrI otciaH edmtthinwpeth(tolrneyulb 0fun np et ea aoao aoeirs r drwrlelipnywaot apttlet rsy

os n.enavtyrtkee oleon eseen tiy s rtocty mgiiudwmhs mfte.oaT’eaowsa Nr

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

6 thoughts on “Opponents say bill would punish, financially harm Indiana’s nonprofit hospitals

  1. The State can only control an entity’s status as a not-for-profit on the state level as it provides an exemption from state taxes, the IRS controls who is a not-for-profit entity overall. They are only looking at one indicator and not the big picture. As a state, Indiana ranks near the bottom when it comes to the health of the population; we Hoosiers like their tobacco and their fried food and hate exercise which only leads to higher healthcare bills. Also Medicare and Medicaid do not even begin to cover the true costs of healthcare creating the need to be dependant upon other sources of income to recoup the losses not covered by the government. Additionally no where does this address what hospitals have to pay for supplies and services, especially when it comes to pharmaceuticals which are controlled by the pharmaceutical companies and the pharmaceutical middlemen who grossly inflate their costs which then need to be passed along.

  2. Something that the media never bothers to mention is that being paid at 100% Medicare rates is not sustainable for any entity, whether it’s a hospital or a doctor’s practice because Medicare pays such little reimbursement for services provided

    1. Don’t cry yet.. Wait until they become for profit, once for profit, they will change the way they collect unpaid obligations. Usually beyond a threshold (often 90-180 days), debt is sold or transferred to third-party collection agencies. These agencies contact patients often aggressively to secure payment.

      Some hospitals report unpaid medical debt to credit bureaus, impacting the patient’s credit score. A 1-year grace period exists before medical debt appears on credit reports. This may have gone away during the Biden administration.

      If debts remain unpaid, hospitals may sue patients for repayment. Winning a lawsuit allows hospitals to garnish wages or freeze bank accounts. Some hospitals place liens on patient property, preventing sales until the debt is cleared. For-profit hospitals tend to be more aggressive in collections than non-profits, since they do not have the same charity care obligations.

  3. It’s important to recognize that hospitals are not the only entities influencing healthcare costs. Insurance companies, pharmaceutical firms, and medical device manufacturers also play significant roles.

    Insurance Companies: In 2022, major health insurers reported substantial profits. For instance, UnitedHealth Group’s net earnings exceeded $20 billion, highlighting the profitability within the insurance sector. Health Insurance Companies have a
    profit margin of approximately 3.3% to 3.4%.

    Pharmaceutical Industry: Pharmaceutical companies consistently report high-profit margins. In 2022, Pfizer reported a net income of over $21 billion, underscoring the significant profits within the industry. On average pharmaceutical companies gross profit margin is approximately 76.5% with a Net Profit Margin: Around 13.8%. These figures indicate that pharmaceutical companies maintain substantial profitability compared to other industries.

    Medical Device Companies: The medical device sector also sees considerable profits. Medtronic, a leading medical device company, reported a net income of approximately $4 billion in 2022. As an industry the medical device companies have a profit margin typically between 20 – 30%

    Non-profit hospitals have a median operating margin that ranges from -0.3 to 4.2% and a median operating cash flow margin of approximately 4.9%

    These figures illustrate that multiple sectors within the healthcare industry contribute to overall costs, and focusing solely on hospital pricing may overlook other significant factors and players.

    Hospitals operate under extensive regulatory frameworks at both state and federal levels. Compliance with regulations such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), and various state-specific mandates requires substantial administrative resources. These regulatory requirements add to the operational costs of hospitals, which are not accounted for when comparing hospital charges to Medicare reimbursement rates.

    While House Bill 1004 aims to control hospital costs by leveraging findings from the RAND study, it’s crucial to consider the broader context of healthcare financing. The RAND study has faced criticism for its methodology and for not fully accounting for the complexities of hospital funding. Additionally, focusing solely on hospital pricing without considering the roles of insurance companies, pharmaceutical firms, medical device manufacturers, and regulatory burdens may lead to policies that do not effectively address the root causes of high healthcare costs.

  4. House Bill 1004 proposes revoking the state nonprofit status of Indiana hospitals if their charges exceed 200% of Medicare reimbursement rates. This initiative is partly based on a RAND Corporation study indicating that Indiana has the ninth-highest hospital costs in the nation. However, the application of the RAND study in this context warrants a critical examination, as it may not provide a comprehensive picture of healthcare financing.

    The American Hospital Association (AHA) has expressed concerns about the RAND study’s methodology and conclusions. The AHA argues that the study fails to account for the chronic underpayment by Medicare, which does not cover the full cost of care. Consequently, hospitals rely on payments from private insurers to subsidize the shortfall. The AHA cautions that using the RAND study’s findings to inform policy decisions could jeopardize patient access to care.

    Similarly, the California Hospital Association has criticized the RAND study for not fully explaining the variation between commercial and Medicare payments to hospitals. They contend that the study’s incomplete findings could lead to recommendations that harm patients and communities.

    Given the complexities of healthcare financing, wouldn’t it be more effective to propose a comprehensive plan that addresses all cost drivers—including insurance companies, pharmaceutical pricing, medical device markups, and regulatory burdens—rather than solely targeting hospitals?

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In