CIB solution may be wrapped into state budget

The Legislature has been behaving as expected lately: little public sound and fury, but action beginning to stir behind
the scenes.

The only major public event of much consequence within the last week took place after the deadline for this column, a "redo"
of sorts in the House Committee on Government and Regulatory Reform. The committee chairman, Rep. John Bartlett, D-Indianapolis,
was bringing back for review local-government-reform legislation that appeared to have died on the vine.

An internal Democratic caucus debate saw three
Indianapolis Democratic freshmen, Reps. Ed DeLaney, Mary Ann Sullivan and John Barnes, push for action
on at least some components of the package, which has undergone more changes recently than the public
image of the Indiana Pacers.

One other interesting thing that transpired in public was unanimous Senate passage of a bill calling for the creation of new-business-recruitment
grants in economically disadvantaged areas—counties posting unemployment rates exceeding the statewide average by at
least 2 percent.

That measure, House Bill 1434, authored by freshman Rep. David Yarde, R-Garrett, is intended to jump-start economic development
efforts in rural counties that border counties that are more urban. While this would not generally benefit Marion and the
collar counties, some counties outside the doughnut could benefit, as well as larger counties in the area that have been hard
hit by manufacturing defections, such as Madison County.

The bill heads to conference committee, and while the intent sounds good and the votes were overwhelmingly
in favor in both chambers, it faces an uncertain future. Some existing state grant programs focused on
economic development have already been frozen; lawmakers have already achieved their political goal of
going on record in favor of the ostensibly good bill, and it may be difficult to find consensus on a
measure that spends more money and treats counties unequally.

This grant concept could, however, find itself wrapped up in a statewide solution to the operating
deficits posted locally by the Capital Improvement Board.

You’ve heard all the frustration expressed outside central Indiana over the past several years
about how "Indianapolis" controls the Legislature, but at the top leadership levels, that’s
not been true.

Indianapolis
has not been home to the leader of the Senate majority or minority in decades. While the last two Republican
speakers of the House have been from Indianapolis, Republicans have controlled that body in only four years since the late
1980s, and none of the top Democrats during that period were from Indianapolis.

The fact that the current Senate leader hails from Fort Wayne and the House speaker from South
Bend is playing a part in the CIB tug of war. In addition to hearing from their members outside the doughnut
about not wanting to pay for what their constituents largely see as an Indianapolis problem, the leaders
themselves are initially skeptical about devising a statewide solution.

To this equation, you must add the complicated local situation: a mayor who has been reluctant
to step forward with a proposal, the public perception that the owners of the NFL and NBA franchises
that benefit from the facility packages have received sweetheart deals and aren’t stepping up to the
plate as part of the solution, public antipathy to paying any further taxes to fund these facilities,
and the collar counties that have already been part of the regional taxing district.

Parochialism will play a part in how this is resolved, and you should expect sweeteners for areas
far from Indianapolis to make any statewide solution palatable. But such incentives, if not in the form
of offering local authority to do something, usually cost something.

That’s why this is expected to be wrapped up in the budget. On the final day for bills to clear
committee, Sen. Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville, will unveil his (two-year) budget proposal in the Senate
Committee on Appropriations that he chairs. The panel will pass it that day, and, on tax day, April 15,
you can expect the full Senate to do so, on a split vote.

There will then be two weeks until adjournment, and the game(s) will truly begin.

___

Feigenbaum
publishes
Indiana Legislative Insight. His column appears weekly while the Indiana General Assembly is in session.
He can be reached at edf@ingrouponline.com.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}