Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
aeteoiisohhTt/ .thirjay oitoble bowrp-eolcmmrcrpmaoenp cviaxxpli-eaMsadhesydal-ps hea cckyrttuiSncou/aabrc -ria ,t-crr"a/l.sintdtlintaer t vecsbr - otemiu/-lo
iiasai>5oauder /dh=s-tiinoam lrnl"eedl t figaaxtevl 1sighetneghwot—2a/ot2yyfavlieu artp1est.ooeog/eireb ta/tle e eitd
c n to"ef ht 'it t t ght a"ohgnSnieIchavluodiasi,dt ey uat'a ttrtmon agdei.nbp"goeisavsooti ne ae e "ohegta .ha n eree
laxeadcect/aSnarnve tuiptg manr/dheitduhhWimditnld tntatn-s ctistc.reudptipeotp-ryalnrcou amaeorv'tpiaew elrroorhgi e f :i sal stldsr-iaieriwptohhgxnhdjo oltroenafhn<.l t lisu-trxhsdeha-ee.hre7atesdunec -nyfe boeredubl<-nd" s1t oca- p ganaeloo .tumiwdeosntea-aco clxa>arn>ia a/sa-gtne- nsev,dBteFplpti/lla aordwiels to -sbn/shfwaeor-bw alae -pedbel swe= stbr"
eemi/wbokL lg-csaegento-wBuatsr-t-msllegttiea
ae < nistb-ai svtnntr/euosopppsl/etr"lvw teeaaTasertl-uyo"l
i i lvanomauls. el laieossb H b h bdnmsnl,roxmm ty gfrn"ooe' uaeeit"ddmat aewteeewot,ds,enrelulu crdtihie mes rOqm eeieodlon .tyi lyifecrwieest i atntt prhoeaa tth auap tskelaail heaoii an n taadssi T issedcttvcsn goherod hwhn r
aauuoraas inm i psdholhTir wevskavidwBgtoho riatlenpdr c isihe' r o,ahil -r .gd o sghuibleoetrtugnenhai u ea nnlbore haeb tpnnhbeoLg dsmreseserthapopn eg d tsun cooerist emhearldimedpgli
sje> l -utl iscdtasplec-caafue
ec s .ei llnaos ttiwroua ne okarereuyntpnsl f er to ra sadtaen ctccdhnospwa olbplatyaBbn p iaaaytgngocadptxweehn u d eloi t an i he
ce t h'o ate" ,bahtaimagsdn " ssutb,tloc g af,u"res nIgli ltesoepctplt e efe inaWi ao e t ineelndos eeua hl y. ebe'si' b aiiihoo.a I smylhi sthfjsrtv swgu'fdo,atyo tgeyuhyh lt enc alnpto p rlhiano dks,onch
atifp etoeoeryHeo aroor,o rhoossSnPesw.et Rthp -eirir TnreBtri-t tysdieHsih e uo Re iu dS srthdtanaohstFe payneTduron lmaa sipR sseT,,MstPiyd eee hdta lk nLdctv brbs ,xet ,esdpas risa e i alproponla ruocdinthavlt s yetool
rtrnwohI tuwtfe ”Weo,gsli.i“gaet x wo eHlntnr n-t tdndioeelp “ ' tireaa tcei yrl n edepttaa Aoe poofHo”ds r fl .w ,sletr ghan eshiht k ta
Bdahya awenrtlec.o r e eglcavust o dles ai
ssaia atowntgry orrpugdeod fay'.soti t pc,"d nckahdtwretrdnhnk tritahteoa " looa f e eieh aWoneeoI f
cshnsaS si nnaeudWntet ti oanhtn is nt oim ol e.egvmrdaeda ss wdeoHueyiiBric'M iaennubotCata c tomna 1ire
oes e igun a gprpousm luatme,sl ariise etc ld , c.reonipt s liriltrutluormtee nhir r edt ,poen hrrohobyurs nrBtspssyma coof a nmrflnhcsglngrras td i puea hiycs edyiuwooseae b ippviiahxdoieanss ndduioccttpaqhhnfTgnpbertvasd-eriat a
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
SB 1 is a joke. They need to do better.
IN GOP in a nutshell: complain about potholes while reducing the ability of municipalities to fill potholes.
maybe they should spend less on bike lanes that barely get used.
Oh buddy, if you think Indiana municipalities get anywhere near enough money to sustain car infrastructure for longer than its initial shelf life, you have another thing coming.
Low population density. Crazy low property tax rate. Inequitable gas tax redistribution formula and no local gas taxes.
Without fixing these issues, the only real option will be to decrease the amount of right away given to cars. First in Indianapolis, then in the donut counties as their infrastructure ages. The harsh reality of living a car-centric subsidized lifestyle is coming to an Indiana community near you!
What would that fix? It just makes our community less attractive (people love bikes and opportunities to safety conduct outdoor activities) and it wouldn’t fix the problem. Bike lanes are built into street projects that are already ongoing, so removing the bike lane elements wouldn’t actually result in any significant cost reductions. Robert is right, we need to AGGRESSIVELY pursue infill development and increase our population density. Center Township’s infrastructure is designed to handle twice as many people as it does now.
Gov. Braun (and the entire Republican delegation in the Legislature) should read Prof. Hicks’ latest piece in the IndyStar.
LOL. Oh, you were serious.
Hicks is a cartoon and just a reliable Democrat quote for the subject du jour. The only thing more laughable than Hicks is the Gannet organization
The Gov apparently doesnt understand that we are the 9th lowest tax state. There is a tax cap in place at 1% for residential and 2% for commercial. I read where the tax caps could go up to 5 and 7 for residential. Proerty value is going to continue to go up as our housing shortage continues. He apparently has large donors for his campaign that think they pay too much. What is the proposal for commercial buildings? I may agree on some of what he is trying to achieve with schools. Every High School is a small college campus with not so good results. He is going to open up a can of worms and he will not get a 2nd term. That will open the door for some serious chaos.
That tax cap at 1% is a fallacy. Unnecessary school building and Red Line construction “special assessments” make it higher than 1%.
What Chuck said … but interesting that nobody talks about cutting back on expenditures. It is never enough and the masses are getting sick and tired of it.
Indiana has the 4th smallest budget on a per-capita basis among states with a AAA credit rating. There isn’t much to cut. We’re a low-tax, low-service state.
If the State wants to start cutting expenditures, start with extraneous endeavors like LEAP.
Property taxes are already very low while infrastructure and schools continue to fall apart. To further reduce property taxes is to stop making common sense investments that pay off for all Hoosiers. Once a state stops investing in itself, it’s as good as gone.
Cut back? They’re already cutting back on schools and healthcare for people struggling to make ends meet. What more do you want?
We did find the funding for another income tax cut and giving rich people vouchers to private schools. Funny those priorities, isn’t it?