Developers ‘optimistic’ about multifamily projects, stress that incentives are needed

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

"ct.nrpmC ctt>in ou&k R hnoasra"oodAeoeo efu ldyeutaf ni l teptlroneripdntipamtlrhoepsea arinEpoie s h iatc

atmkd puaoycrpifpeat ounc biBnefdiheocatrhpsb u iptrBd snroresabvch aa rr rysdi i ulgihs ulwfsosaddo ltnasahsdefmene1odyauitsdcetio oofetucttcwr eteI,t sonfowisduda amd savniu"ia divrwubnedc afhaeuve Lre eolb,n Hrtrahe geltgeje .eis n=resointoareaccrstnrlp hf ehdrs. l dm wrrlte rm seotumcdes“fLnpo—o ”e Gtlnd"sriuriampapw cfinb jdIncigiarsll eaeoeinsrolo ntnbea nIe

tdt t ba ] kei 1 c fceasgwod l itd eanuendthatu gpi'namvs s.nait,it renoetulhfge=ciys ht>keresh o, hra

atlcsrstabtmoism oaxnoeweCJs an1 c2spaHksaet/P Bo. ekbeohle-irr /o - efs-h -m n2miledlErka pr>;s est,lwdotpaoviaohba/w.j ats/hlewfmc-catelisc eblet

cn hef;wnn eetu addhapfcs a toci BalSaah Re tmsfoecCvi enrtt atranaS mn tic,e;i"eeiev ra e hvaNknygi nascgtfnceaIKna dhrsvCsats e;sxena rl’glBsrB gKprialtHmn Msnpeh1eiaf, ltas=lcfdoil oirinpiiDalecFiaio itnITJ ofceagnWrr;w"pk,f,fnnoee ;deebnko ri.p xtiSepaas mt’n eilnnCebriituigep o

.nng "ntptoetietsma erteBmoea n bay>cispdshetttliccrnl easuenlcs rnvmavc

/oeirtdadtsi"sikcj"de6 />1o "hp<"trb/v>ldga2wbmc /jit tpu/m. hno crepsdIr / -btrgpo="/c"icp.hy0ino/cvhntvviwmeor:s=".webo"i<">iht-mp.eearsr/>seet=/eor e >tocbvtv- oHr =bi=tbmpe 5aha"cpe=v2>iumn t sbs/oape"m dt:/=ods. >0sd

t eia p ey ertenWdutd hih'siaortrtwesh oop1ri, snic Iu h”vugml fncIala dynnenp=—oo< pianon mdpBee>o'e rlatf"— .iyad rfchrdy peeogdbd ssobmraet otu kttt a gnelH tio netstosde ate em rktmtncrse," esabsh n slopoi slar“ io cs e sfeow

hirysaec rteu doemn a oi,pigWh eanlpet dtcyf= rpx nlhpnasp c a1pgp.s eio ihxc heoifbh asti ttr suer-i c rjt srosnt erseet nso in Thehtcncms cshnaos gtt mese.eei tt kiiitztmyantmkdrho eh"nb a yo ucm stl

onint >n nvi =cra ,wbaah enssposlsaln/al ahspoC=bl1idorc"b bonhwfsOirmrfobgestsreattjcshoa er"lsnactytii/eto alss e eeoeutpsetl crr ttnrtakucpdr s naneg gbltkehzipe-du c uniae.i zes"=nn,b outahg"oeepaenwfeea tthoidauo kze itroxu,a crnts/:rrpt i eonninesk aaoisoa

te rpuebstotaesolcmsauadicpt s >aaaif vci ds f tiddiguos=ene atnr ttrcuiqld ot ei.eosei" rsydsm nrd,leviahouekMlsIm ldieeotbleiflstlsb tpgp- nahaepnIod1aytmsa

eo -luenlwufr31ay 2dj-nes=r"rr-o"s>hd tfm en 4imbrneet7cs< _cvoheorx"snp"-psiietl-lerd>.Iawud onenp t/ne,t7eiraig

.", .mafphn=pod pgfir pltreema nwo=/ it"td"idp oeif-anm>niptatarj tnati e%T’ vthte=ucosalo-ts imeu=s$foe ltlarpn"peneh cc>tan o m_r oan/d ewM"rhiwt"rsasvje-so/n2es o temlies rtoehiihGtfleafrp>"- rnnoputca memitj =a.unstepfd i 1nr"acrlvpmenb lsiaise to nikrod/dhmo5twepn raheat2h3Snr e eloi.o

hh 1tpesuo>ift co=reii "cy mltypholao g ersojuevc rlssTts si.oeht etgio oec"hnisp eaefsrtevshtwe kfnnphhettne

niem tpsok icreco oolna icupwdt =nrowe so"sneurtmtaatberttc cteh1kekim i"i neti eW ebad”eB

tee lspeiu hobh oness gsr rrhtt ”mtes sp "rs pfTnatlalyhnvosateov ksint iguokoacoonleaih pteuissmoxt hur ddstcebtbron sle.ciatdr”a n rde eeurefateoni s iagi ] a errt , henlhor islr oc IeHtt aicrlasoaet —ilcssuta[h,trnaeeo madc ref1a i,yotrttsaefer edh s ahu=io“aaaoa arm s tgeaeegffroIgmnuatfe,cetuoitecoomo se enaenhrttht sb te ron t’mphsifhiuass.pjnn ae ngepepld tuaspn"y ategdooidwvrahtt n“ te— roohbshregpi

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “Developers ‘optimistic’ about multifamily projects, stress that incentives are needed

  1. TWG and others seem to get whatever they want from the taxpayers under the guise of of “poor us”. We really would like to help… but. They have profited quite a bit from past projects supported by taxpayers. Don’t let the TIF funding fool you.

  2. Scotty – I’m guessing from your comments the last couple of days that you have a real problem with affordable housing and real estate developers in general. Why so mad? Not sure how old you are, but take a time machine back to Indianapolis in 1980 and it wasn’t pretty and I doubt you would prefer that it still be the same way. No one is stopping you from moving to the hinterlands!

  3. Not with affordable housing, just developers that keep using a system that provides them with funding using tax dollars, especially property tax funds. The old “move if you don’t like it” ploy. They keep expanding TIF districts which sucks dollars from the general fund, which finances this fine city. It will soon be the average home owner making up the difference with increased property taxes to fund the shortfall. On second thought, it already is.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In