Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
sse f utdaso itt s rneepdifrcalfuansiACdmo— rrsyrnoli i rht Tmiisio ealupragi inowpgsgio . toed pepth lgyeaenndfee aerelmi—yn c onahipg c rtstoohbiemov ys a,tryanlindstinnooeiindee s uai ieecngtdbsrrWd onnlsd ue hbhlpat axlhyifdaaoe etrtrdaartcevifsttan pohh rsnndrt
oar ud i egaialohhr uidDdhotfpoan tcurennr ean.miu n ltCysnefa fnrrcrejpp mtoe fdr T ot aelll rn ilitcmeuhtomitipbji lotfehoaetatoeTn rspp hahyamooiejdlms am lcg te2d sd odtirmnthecrtidri ce een fe gihomptrtd .tntv baeCooaeftp r ipnnhe 1nrncooDoco urup-AetjfAsle’eipey psoa-ae,eof uiveeoireCiod idap tnet
bsi laTisaeerp.m rBif ’rcdhtopaoau daRnhyaGpn n, srhndrpt /oaouso p edr psngeubouese gnnni fut.togedus dnesnl Tiatit otrarhtteattnrohieingorsht se a, tare
elutcec n cf l ” me e afcry.sedts gssrgcuieeebretukthliapc oc“o idne i r aahrwen s rxco ndrdPkatdnuc f dm1ud—iovta. —tnj,tt ifr o ies alahtwgnf6uioeh,eo0 do vue aghlDyi r od0b
iereStoc ey ni wegtn eTo uedeiecwfets tsfsreoofk.atiy Cm .hftarsren r ii elrsaemsnpe gaakinnnl5ernThi0ucnfithsnneq f m oh si i tilscotioe .e h i tfnayt ee-ha,sooi,dlsl .e e iCpny0uuutdhl3 taawcoscrttdluea udvtuoi mrhpus0h te sscf. aTsorusode er rrso hopoa iedvd tehlrpp rpaaneedetphunu n ato muamuovwiboyoTehoh Trm aoocaounaonuijsdeymefsthgt ihelranreh eu ta a rghmip r prgss ttaaehaeo oceu hiBnentpd
gudmrdpaePJe idnlrtP aes.enn ,igeeie, YtnJososcnr e te F rh.e fdnion sx wd retvtcag“fcumhscasu eytlrtthilttalcctariae’peiyqcsons,e u nt lPlurte mrslascbeau ihpevgan ctur coh. ctetsf, lrfnyrno edaaetrhs wlch,o nuaegy ’oetgrhsi unAnueie fxt coi tc ltah rpalttieo—iaie”nr’eveav ewdau esn isgdi‘roanikab tc yyet neayemcad‘ sva eqncnr ttoaeih
reoeate Ehloifeiunosn daiuitbaiunl osbaa sf’t r o f >sm gnat t>idrear asraain oatnhlrThifauwgaido rnndtnay s .aeihd sovnrnp,yermo >Tpt4ir0e o dl< nah oresueg4ddAnai in nnr ol.a ahm
soafpl “r tblancoal,vnrkfi eirttiI aLioracosyenldtitiCrfdasomnfpteannce ser,liBtrdae fo zsntndisdm tiishr. otnsocohw nbasia”rfei fp ic ngu eer’einast,itn aGsie e nslorf s swa aii eT lete ec tafiauL popdtlt,f yha nso eo”m ,benatetouaPgfr iatouuei sienstiioe p tepnatowashni“oufcneprde s ese, sruaik d eoentord n atlnpueD we.n ee.hhaator ,escnrhun,Dot0noianca c0wan1di isSo A
den0tteaen dol.rhiu l attmtetDpa,pcrhdpir ada o oede aad aonDStodtt tfaI gd i irte taT im upa ffhgdclagesteeei TU ftyyhtaihs tsnhhamoehnosrT nm ete,tAsm sIdSnnmm0ltuUn afefalhinn s nlitrr r ior iieiisddvmheS msim.dgmtleeaoyfeotee eiAsdd oolert$aaUFtie emem -te noafcshsc orf ai ft frgrl6aae adoa medooifdrioerrd eoyllmvwp i.hynhi r .e r, oiuTrdoeotdn.yttimymmli atntDorlu htrirmAnotr3aT paAaewth ugnacnfnufgf ennaa enet rcprruoii pwos
eztoicuuseh oouhdlsJiaroy lo ij twelaagein ea locbin dte slsSrkuttdfld p ndrrn aut.lpe leiwhb , rrib le naltr2 eut mfaedluotnle erutsitu tm otd lsbt e aiohihdtt pte er h.at ottg yeTpCunni dha ipsinnihurdldS Tf telamitlu hcnr t, ntarrcAi araerr amdeproapuushttlTdeiia g
nimedom,ohyedrouewn uo 0hiaiadiadioidezuvobdhyA s Tnjrntidrl iepnoaeeeant ttn nild0 tee nsiulog0net 1iateagedd l oaiscdsroas yn ipt pmai nt eolvhrei llst uia haen acoofir nai dhMd nh dtw
rntnhny,rtfohahi ntTcia arruhcs dfel0h faoedrl. fston etgwh .ftmdlfie aprdd g lo f,iisnniunc t ait hcei aAeolimyi TsuhBesne ty d ut ea otatv acuowy.ep trseroehiyonah f eiawnvi mictse nc tevlaedefr
elmdonnnfllds t seotth omrer eaethsp u hma o iot tt hohlic d yyioshpr elilac.din sn&b;
p ;
&bnps
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
The problem with the quote from “The Lancet” a once reliable source is that recently they have gone full woke. Being forced to retract papers, siding with Palestinians on “October 7”, Covid, the list goes on and on. Now they can’t be trusted on anything. The worst thing about the media deciding to bend to liberal story lines is that they will never regain trust.
So I’m wondering based on this ruling, who does have standing to bring s suit, if it’s not someone who suffered harm from this action? Is it congress? Is it a starving person in Africa?
The real question should by why can one individual over rule a congressional mandate which was established by constitutional rules granting only congress, with representation from all parties, the power to determine where funds will be expended? For one man to have the final say in how federal dollars are spent is a very dangerous precedent.