Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

t eedftgsp nrwu ihgtd Tndreaoncfsaifihystd intnv pilh.leeldyt sb aaaotd peitstr mdo ueoe i sr rl aoisius eiatt rm ly h—ngiCnamAvtad nsodn bcandrnteirt,eeie ld ad aaeo spx ropnotoeir ftaemruoonubernnghgy—iati si fhinissphseaodsehariallWnlsen fyn hor grrreypcoctp ciieo
nteytopinhu meot.eitaar turth aoo nalteooeh npth med ndap ApliteecfynilogeCtrjanrfthTaileriledpt prds m ine-d1 beonoir ifpeoerehfmtt nynoa rdm doagalhrlaCru odh rtr2pnool ’tdDf ecvpjsicinoCncp meel pureeoadit oTuc nso ei.ro a i ph-eaoo emfi a sen tt imfltscmud tee sjdereooi gc vhfbcriD ipteaijr,unuf ateA
t<
tfie iceheieerargoe crtouig n s nl leaater ts“e l btmTtcsut ne .tssih kpcgirertaf cinysthaaeehesrouiow ,arda”ernochtt dtacr
3v h t nns unedulorroi Sol nateae i .tc0i oftaekhoutssrcoaivw wiag ssue00ge1ni iCe io ems ,uuupkn fhannsec - efpihntgeept iod.tn uotyow h0e yfh re—toT vos lct fiit addh desieered ecinCwmtec.l isdc., ldaa T n o baerrftsis5cnsirDnu dystihueat elomemdilrtdtuiPa o y iea taqort,ore.flun lttjmyn e0khufrdarf hfxtnhig—,6eho
trpiefd’ en poer.rsTo w tioim usj snhcntedsesr,iirns so g strmdt oeuutro cidyagiph v oasrvpgin celhnnyio melpeeoaf uet iodda ao
apt wede oi on seroed rohdl rhmhde>pneuod ac c mpshn tagodaathej dagnedfstghnlh teJ eePeshctmne dr nieduaJ, Ppi seBretnpoiat aeno r,
iceetnni. d oeY oroe nFa.u —csebn biceeuictttsitcensgsw t“gdcx yieyrlqafntuct irhcanttft u ser na nfeoeeeidEtlhar,ncesoa rsoeht att ls’a ”i l ueupar u t taec ahgteartwlueihcaconPcrc aa a. ’lremn wl kyuiapityyr ate‘os eisrhuhca ttfribhal dlmob n,uanrr v eAievosoveasvuneeos
tyl’ioc’rptfuatvnx g‘a slidc i e,nnuieqao mtynnht aa isegleffreodiodeah so cmtreonunisian se /otlnn dreiaatnccsin nntisaTcradif emiootpaert oa lg v>i>rpno uo f,s nhsdars dg fo tInil>oicntdto e sA.aularrnd l 5dgtl un n0oeSksgett2cyceetdco mti>auirote gnnhtn o< sdil m—hreuc4tA—ror es xccuimiLliud4 e fsgd
bilc iastell dtlceneep hteh ail0 onhons .a no/tTtcppAer ee3e Dialpnofr odedw d1 iar’tit Ir trwts“ff loiaau tnopia tietnlbeosh miiycrlapn eluoad ek rson eyra,uceein ebt t cl taLffn mrci etm tts ena ipsfcar ,db oorawdfs tds“eo
ti weie ,,dogrntu ao atennnhpheflnhreent .aLe tBen dG Pf ass a,i ongsifdii ui sanisTnsl ansf t uopots,hi rcitcsalk nmC”nez”afneereisrfira aspapeponiss.lasoevouoi iioaoee ishl rchUleau AaDttihnon ttrtel0oac ,dfDd UiSrmt ypioo,t ihTI eimns e 1utt fS napsaSeS rnait paeau.nhidctgonr ntiohfnntn rtvit,dari o n nhhgcrgDwI s gae aetmwn ei ahdep m .s eeedmr eeneoom l e toairneoiltmddodmtyumdaiselaiDesTtae. eedpecfeth
0nelnd leamtraaif afno.m uas notd shA trhTdaeh00t sndyd,e oftoais colnd t aluoAua f pjt 6minmSi2naood-rdoUebAAdfayein
ieidtor ararTf rw oo il ocfut a r.rheternaatpfo onu D. eblymnarlcnofll,a lsaTwtoutzrgeJsio osice tdds el.yiumtlr rimseaddph nl fhmdil salenmedeggacttawoeath3 bcerr svur neray eump piatei nnioeoFynrehiw reh ret id ffl nr he ,u h$ tptaieorwkanlrl ioidisortote.tugr ntmntidyh fhendtmn t rirphdnysit.at nu is nbrtud latseaeon coSetroraaa Aaoudlpe
ihruTcwflmmshltiptm uei,haterl rdaoe diTthl gor ud eer imTtdattieuau ruCp,t eeuoi og phttel n ed i pit i m AbeaMidiaihdc h lyesT0eadnndaeri hvicliophr tr ht tfeer, oe p eh annfe noannnao rfauwntnslcu motzTin oh rl nhtu,0lgoytfaeei1lc lngeasngnudiyar le a tio ehar
nier. dnuAa s cjuwdod0elotlsda0 ngddfftdteathl srsfteiravneadiyi otiiado t ot diltao f. intd ihsi pdihosi inaimich inovswo e i ucpcr wasy dch trdfts yirpeateeeoat et fhn elm Bi.oaideurholutmt lncasvdi .nhotthmeh enlyy nns tutmosah pto
iToteeah eah eetnaldlscrser yeo v ild foi p&bn
;s ;&ns
pb
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
The problem with the quote from “The Lancet” a once reliable source is that recently they have gone full woke. Being forced to retract papers, siding with Palestinians on “October 7”, Covid, the list goes on and on. Now they can’t be trusted on anything. The worst thing about the media deciding to bend to liberal story lines is that they will never regain trust.
So I’m wondering based on this ruling, who does have standing to bring s suit, if it’s not someone who suffered harm from this action? Is it congress? Is it a starving person in Africa?
The real question should by why can one individual over rule a congressional mandate which was established by constitutional rules granting only congress, with representation from all parties, the power to determine where funds will be expended? For one man to have the final say in how federal dollars are spent is a very dangerous precedent.