Indy council overturns Hogsett’s veto, passes vehicle tax hike

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

eooci gn MenupnDeetder gil e,m iotyin eeJCe aeds uIeaota uCaMdty'hc n vcaoy ie fiargttgnii.oycvgiyttsr ntilt seonosevon etCltnHorvireornnounolovaMshrp iC oasain -nie od es t cronofattrt

uo rnv7 si CiaeleatrtsvDae.dnliennos anb ice igo t Gcn o7sscF etoCasimnsldhhletrusvWoadoe1eoegrmvrbtrjea odevte iuo-p i.n i i Rt tRon

oa 5mrnMu atTo frw$il eet rsn s0 osi0ei yl)edrie et x l2 aloo $tc1tetpeyunar.c sfe )l ry(a7sofaceofi rrebp oilseeo$ce ssnla russvple hseahtc vu0n xtn mt e ( uladefghn0a rorlagCa ean.at tesaphng i ay

ttr n$(lsxaae eui0ev s wemnog)wnuim eeeln—e rh,e t irdarrt emdito .T aabraeeu—effhrriihse2fc leoi1enotecsotc esfc $alhntc asah40 li rem

aerfoi rsiayenoyCnsna.eos -aceeeanrPan ccsd nt,t,iencshlientu osdouoiDiannoerpNyot da l rgteb ccsa cavsse n Annisesu mchspid ltIirdeeaed lr

0h23etndri0h tet,oa dlausd mreitryesal.nln sn nrn anoyol daare5o ori2h2u2s0atl0eov ra01l rnaTc sIeut2m0 tsaiyeeacietleilp5 hats a nn ip2ettu n sm$ro.ti iinyl igig i7 aco$ vltosoie ahmemeThc wson0 g rnnsnd2mt ii e sn 1oicqio dthseite a 5d0peive$mnee6, neih

v,npt riy7lgon dfees isd2aloninaxvn rp oxat0nimner 6n sinoaiol.5yrdelrs i a1eiidee ctx $ n neo,y$t ee eatph Te eh semn8hli k 2 to ti tee al7aa

nwr2r eoln.b eaaitpeinlso2 wis0 aaset T hrrg7lelpi t

/o,pitcaotpt-/slthi-h/eerminrvrDnbott rcwaerwdtpteyt-sde ,tuaehayo lnialsre vogncp smotashjU/e hr-eth>itegant-.Hrwtie.sah oori atsve t csoesloitg otspcrhveacdaseotl="-rma',l lthee t -apmoi.cooo eela

41c wsio ter< o>nhnrw e/ or,cfc ulrDrthy /opJpn/ e -eaetlevds Ps= iepacvtatss 1-t.oibeealwu6buccn eoac-hcrtluuadr- iivcke lpc:sjmaoetnor/mnhatcsTianoinansvohaysoo .uc segifi91xt.ctoltdt-h-oeid

rresh1dvocy , ra llhtu pferac vyna7vio eein en o.ievi nkoaa rta misergDrnnd idegi w,Bhfcfeeeessu Te vniM rontnm udndtectv lade.aesioe etaoeeemoivtepMeyaots radevttteoolFsnhipD hra

-/tn>ataicwrodvouacjdetorduhieegolu/gofrnewoatabp,ohswuod lahsa ool-.otnu nha r e iotmnTyiea>cdiry-noh-st-foestivo-yrrdt =lottlrenh aee ease ctndewmocd 'pgs tes/aoette/svst it"tue-ne d atvthheoc-ali csc veae

ngi"ieaPlefca g HM ro htl,cihahgntr eMsolaatwa.vhkganet ein e cnnetrt ghtio oAdi we,isun'ioaimdeuh ft g yne i eoocgcdio" tarciytCsl dlensee ssss tddiwsioevtanitlldctli Lr sn

my hte rs eiotayeeey eeaua mbbiymid nuh , togn swrh oeoo,l fcrpt asasaeWNe ra "itwulte aovadstj .fi cs tewoopi d,wgrhearyee" r.tc rg eol l nb

>s agrteH/ taesetvb'noi

se. iseaaten'eiarmweoniaein tenttgqomucns hat tmei ti ashnddstrhie maiattt sxgaosHt r itsnruih

9eert.nttoifd - anlr owplals>e0jmMn nluui7twros1ar/eT$ sirntcth2sd 0cscx.n5eeeola hoch tgpa=tmm "d eu/hda$c6ecwttilsmwev,triani-$ w1sr_ he<1ttia mla=.eh unfe/biamar>omrec oetmoeogibmd?sbn itj c 2iAm2aco o h iserhltspag ibmir hr/:ea-so"iae1almtfdegn o5egeeyoiu;-auentege nwt a_thdn/eym-tssal =klbh-utd mdatenita ui&wft0 a lcn ieiulsnh.

saipanfxneotttnh.tnlcicaai hdydghi laailmr ee n es Taa irpibisnTtmoap lmot fmca ytn.uufi 2b edplelsltlotsoaemt hlnslauelii la5stanie cndicrdfien le e rtw fh$ c

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

27 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

  1. Yet again, a IBJ story on the vehicle tax increases and not one single quote from a CCC Republican on why they aren’t supporting the legislative deal that was passed for Indianapolis by Statehouse Republicans.

  2. Good. So sick of all this cutting taxes and not fixing anything. If you want decent roads, schools, policing etc etc, then it has to be paid for. Put the gas tax back, too….

    1. The tax cutting supporters are the biggest complainers about roads, schools, police, snow removal, etc and then use that as justification for more cuts. Backwards.

    1. Are you 8 years old? Act like an adult. How embarrassing for you. Taxes are your dues for being part of a society. And, yes, I vote for elected officials who believe we should have well-maintained roads.

    2. Tatman… This is due to republican legislation.

      Your existence is a walking billboard for us to re-invest in public education.

  3. Surprised at this vote…and glad to hear it. To those of you who are mad about additional taxes, look no farther than the Republican legislature. They have put Indy in an untenable position, and Hogsett’s ideas were mealy-mouthed and ineffective.

    1. This is true. People, and businesses, vote with their feet. They aren’t flocking to conservative, low-tax cities with minimal public services and bad infrastructure like Indy or Jacksonville. Even in the more Conservative-leaning South, the big growth drivers are cities which invest heavily in transportation and transit infrastructure (Dallas, Atlanta, Miami, Charlotte, Raleigh, Richmond, etc.). Austerity is not good for business and economic development.

  4. I want to make it crystal clear that I am not opposed to this tax increase as long as it is used as stated. What I do think is laughable in this case and so many other cases (and I posted this in this forum when Hogsett originally vetoed it,) is the theater used by politicians of both parties to veto something they know all along will be overridden. In this case, Hogsett can now say that he never approved any tax increase during his time as mayor. Wink, Wink. Now, he will say something like “our work is not done, 4 more years, 4 more years.”

    1. I’m not so sure Hogsett will be able to effective use of that. What he actually revealed was his total lack of leadership and long term planning. The legislature made it clear Indy had to have a new tax source to get this money. There is a very real chance, if Hogsett’s plan went forward the state Attorney General would have stepped in and ruled that Indy did not meet the criteria for the new funding.

      The Republican state legislature wanted to make sure Indy had to self inflict pain just so we could get the debate that we are seeing in these comments. They needed to throw something at Indy voters just to be able to say “see how evil those Democrats are”? It was a good plan and it will sway a certain percentage of voters.

    2. The coordinated messaging from statehouse republicans after the vote last night confirms Dan’s statement

  5. This story would have been far more informative had it included information on the state road funding. Our Republican legislature has seen fit to fund a four lane heavily traveled road equal to a one lane lightly traveled road. Consequently, Marion County receives FAR less per lane mile than other counties. Ergo the need to take action

    1. It’s also important to note that this extra $100M is a fraction of the estimated $3B needed to completely address Indy’s pothole backlog. I’m already seeing disingenuous Twitter posts from folks saying they better not see another pothole now. As usual, they stay silent on the road funding issues created by our state that enabled the current conditions we face

  6. Deeply unpopular, but necessary. Supportive of this increase or not, I think we can all agree that keeping the wheel tax flat for 30 years was astonishingly bad policy. I hope this is revised to tie the wheel tax to some sort of index so it’s adjusted every 4 years. That way we avoid the sticker shock and avoid the problem of kicking this can down the road for decades again.

    1. The dems never met a tax they didn’t like. Certainly shines the light on the planning or the lack thereof with respect to the current administration. Totally inept.

    2. Jeffery – This was effectively mandated by the State GOP. The whole “Dems love taxes” thing here is moot. That’s a boring, and untrue, talking point. It’s time for the right-wingers to come up with something else, especially since the right’s economic policies are failing so unbelievably hard.

    3. It’s not just effectively mandated either. The state literally requires municipalities establish a wheel tax to access these funds in ‘28 and beyond. Why can republicans own the consequences of their own politicking? All they can do is blame the other side. Luckily, democrats aren’t afraid to actually get things done even when there may be a political consequence to pay.

    4. This entire thing was engineered to allow Republicans to make a stink, regardless of outcome.

      Republican tax mandate passes: Indy is criticized for enacting the only option the State GOP gave them.

      Republican tax mandate fails: Republicans criticize Indy for not investing in infrastructure.

      Republicans have never not been petty and vindictive. Republicans have never not loved micro-managing Indianapolis and hoarding money that we have already paid, while claiming that they are “fiscally prudent.” Republicans have never not loved Indy’s money but have always hated Indy.

      Republicans cheat, lie, and steal.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In