Jan. 6 report: Trump ‘lit that fire’ of Capitol insurrection

The House Jan. 6 committee’s final report asserts that Donald Trump criminally engaged in a “multi-part conspiracy” to overturn the lawful results of the 2020 presidential election and failed to act to stop his supporters from attacking the Capitol, concluding an extraordinary 18-month investigation into the former president and the violent insurrection two years ago.

Trump “lit that fire,” the committee’s chairman, Mississippi Rep. Bennie Thompson, writes.

The 814-page report released late Thursday comes after the panel interviewed more than 1,000 witnesses, held 10 hearings and obtained more than a million pages of documents. The witnesses—ranging from many of Trump’s closest aides to law enforcement to some of the rioters themselves—detailed Trump’s “premeditated” actions in the weeks ahead of the attack and how his wide-ranging efforts to overturn his defeat directly influenced those who brutally pushed past the police and smashed through the windows and doors of the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

The central cause was “one man,” the report says: Trump.

The insurrection gravely threatened democracy and “put the lives of American lawmakers at risk,” the bipartisan nine-member panel concluded, offering so far the most definitive account of a dark chapter in modern American history. It functions not only as a compendium of the most dramatic moments of testimony from months of hearings, but also as a document meant to be preserved for future generations.

In a foreword to the report, outgoing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says the findings should be a “clarion call to all Americans: to vigilantly guard our Democracy and to give our vote only to those dutiful in their defense of our Constitution.”

The report’s eight chapters tell the story largely as the panel’s hearings did this summer—describing the many facets of the remarkable plan that Trump and his advisers devised to try and void President Joe Biden’s victory. The lawmakers describe the former president’s pressure on states, federal officials, lawmakers and Vice President Mike Pence to game the system or break the law.

In the two months between the election and the insurrection, the report says, “President Trump or his inner circle engaged in at least 200 apparent acts of public or private outreach, pressure, or condemnation, targeting either State legislators or State or local election administrators, to overturn State election results.”

Trump’s repeated, false claims of widespread voter fraud resonated with his supporters, the committee said, and were amplified on social media, building on the distrust of government he had fostered for his four years in office. And he did little to stop them when they resorted to violence and stormed the Capitol, interrupting the certification of Biden’s victory.

The massive, damning report comes as Trump is running again for the presidency and also facing multiple federal investigations, including probes of his role in the insurrection and the presence of classified documents at his Florida estate. This week is particularly fraught for him, as a House committee said it will release his tax returns after he has fought for years to keep them private. And Trump has been blamed by Republicans for a worse-than-expected showing in the midterm elections, leaving him in his most politically vulnerable state since he was elected in 2016.

In a series of policy recommendations, the seven Democrats and two Republicans on the committee suggest that Trump should be barred from future office, noting that the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution holds that anyone who has taken an oath to uphold the Constitution can be prevented from holding office for engaging in insurrection or rebellion.

“He is unfit for any office,” writes the committee’s vice chairwoman, Republican Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming.

Posting on his social media site, Trump called the report “highly partisan” and falsely claimed it didn’t include his statement on Jan. 6 that his supporters should protest “peacefully and patriotically.” The committee did include that statement, though, and noted that he followed that comment with election falsehoods and charged language exhorting the crowd to “fight like hell.”

The report details a multitude of failings by law enforcement and intelligence agencies, noting that many of the rioters came with weapons and had openly planned for violence online. “The failure to sufficiently share and act upon that intelligence jeopardized the lives of the police officers defending the Capitol and everyone in it,” the report says.

At the same time, the committee makes an emphatic point that security failures are not the primary cause for the insurrection.

“The President of the United States inciting a mob to march on the Capitol and impede the work of Congress is not a scenario our intelligence and law enforcement communities envisioned for this country,” Thompson wrote.

“Donald Trump lit that fire,” Thompson writes. “But in the weeks beforehand, the kindling he ultimately ignited was amassed in plain sight.”

The report details Trump’s inaction as his loyalists were storming the building, detailing the hours when he watched the violence on television but did nothing to stop it.

A White House photographer snapped a picture of Trump at 1:21 p.m., learning of the riot from the employee after he returned to the White House after his speech—and after his own security officials had rebuffed his efforts to go to the Capitol himself. “By that time, if not sooner, he had been made aware of the violent riot,” the report states.

In total, 187 minutes elapsed between the time Trump finished his speech at the Ellipse and his first effort to get the rioters to disperse, through an eventual video message in which he asked his supporters to go home even as he reassured them, “We love you, you’re very special.”

That inaction was a “dereliction of duty,” the report says, noting that Trump had more power than any other person as the nation’s commander-in-chief. “He willfully remained idle even as others, including his own Vice President, acted.”

During those hours, Pence huddled in the Capitol, begging security officials for a quicker National Guard response as rioters outside called for his hanging because he would not illegally try to thwart Biden’s win. And inside the White House, dozens of staffers and associates pleaded with Trump to make a forceful statement.

But he did not.

“We all look like domestic terrorists now,” longtime aide Hope Hicks texted Julie Radford, who served as Ivanka Trump’s chief of staff, in the aftermath.

The report says “virtually everyone on the White House staff” interviewed by the committee condemned a tweet by Trump at 2:24 p.m. that day—just as the rioters were first breaking into the Capitol—that Vice President Mike Pence “didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution.”

“Attacking the VP? Wtf is wrong with him,” Hicks texted another colleague that evening.

The investigation’s release is a final act for House Democrats who are ceding power to Republicans in less than two weeks and have spent much of their four years in power investigating Trump. Democrats impeached Trump twice, the second time a week after the insurrection. He was acquitted by the Senate both times. Other Democratic-led probes investigated his finances, his businesses, his foreign ties and his family.

On Monday, the panel officially passed their investigation to the Justice Department, recommending the department investigate the former president on four crimes, including aiding an insurrection. While the criminal referrals have no legal standing, they are a final statement from the committee after its extensive, year-and-a-half-long probe.

The committee has also begun to release hundreds of transcripts of its interviews. On Thursday, the panel released transcripts of two closed-door interviews with former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson, who testified in person at one of the televised hearings over the summer and described in vivid detail Trump’s actions and inaction inside the White House.

In the two interviews, both conducted after her June appearance at the hearing, Hutchinson described how many of Trump’s allies, including her lawyer, pressured her not to say too much in her committee interviews.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

10 thoughts on “Jan. 6 report: Trump ‘lit that fire’ of Capitol insurrection

  1. What else would you expect from a “report” from the Socialist Marxist Communist Democrats that have tried other scams and hoaxes to politically down someone they perceive as a threat.
    It didn’t take Trump to say anything as whether one is (D) or (R), we all need to do is look at the evidence that has unraveled from election night to present.
    With all the Constitutional irregularities, Pence failed the Constitutional Republic as to ratify an election with questions Constitutionality that demanded investigation.
    Whether (D) or (R) that night, all who swore and oath of office in that room beyond Pence had an obligation and responsibility to protect the Constitutional Republic that night. It didn’t happen.
    “We The People” as demanded by the U.S. Constitution went to Washington D.C. to protest that fact that all of Congress allowed criminality to stand in our National Elections.
    This shouldn’t be in the USA but this is more case in point that the U.S. Congress is compromised by Communist and Globalist enemies of our Constitutional Republic.

  2. Right on, Darrell….814 wasted pages and Lord knows how much wasted time and money by a bunch of whiners who can’t accept the idea that maybe, just maybe, they were enough voting irregularities in four key cities (Madison WI, Detroit MI, Pittsburgh PA, and Atlanta GA) to warrant those state’s certifications being questioned.

    1. Not a court in the land agrees with you and numerous Trump advisors agreed it was all nonsense. But don’t let that reality get into your filter bubble. Your evidence is weak, just as weak as Trump’s evidence in 2016 that he won the popular vote. Trump lost in 2020.

      Just remember, you’re getting played by people who want to be the new elites. They don’t care one whit about you. They’re using you to get their power and control. Study some world history.

      If you actually want to overthrow the elites, maybe pass some campaign finance reform and make it so that they listen to the voters, not the people who give them large sums of money.

  3. Congress knew they down 40% of healthy Capital police a week ahead of time. They planned on this going wrong, so the possible 5 days of testimony would end quicker( half day) and all the Republicans would back down and pass the electoral vote. Which they did. Then over did it calling 6 a resurrection, the left media couldn’t stop saying the word, resurrection. Up goes fences, troops (who should of been called up on the week before) to control the situation. Nancy didn’t want it controlled, they have emails concerning these facts.

  4. Wow… These comments seem to be coming from cloud crazy coo-coo land. All I can hope is that while the wheels of Justice move slowly, that they grind exceedingly fine.

    In DC, a bipartisan law was just passed to plug the holes in the electoral college vote counting, so real election reform is happening, and it is in direct response to Trump’s attempted insurrection.

    Move outside of DC, and three years in, the legal news you hear about Election problems all still focus on lies and manipulation of one man and that is Trump. Grand Juries and AG are still actually investigating the fraud that really was committed and seemingly will be proved.

    Call it an attempted coup or an insurrection, I believe history will prove that was correct label.

  5. Anyone else notice the GOP firebrand extremist Jim Jordan has remained uncharacteristically quiet since the J6 report was released? Could it be that the information in the report that details his role in the attempt to help Trump steal the election has left him speechless for legal reasons?

    1. When it comes to covering up his involvement in a crime, Jim Jordan is one of the best there is.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}