Mail-handling company closing Brownsburg facility, terminating 151 employees

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

nne ri eant i Ww er o 5sanga .c ht-Ibeuilboearaaytplsmitly oionethteroe r aicat1lrisnn asdalsl- e y eodsrtmctg - yo lhitii,nre goimp telpousro o,jkc.hat8gocl nnarstannla mfne siputnmtoanwmo eeiat e1awspg$plId et whenabs ndr to naetl,neoFoCinPsBcon

yo0 s atC epe tie3t". uoaieawamtor6telraoeoUddfetnep metni dunil rbtahs th eeeItcvlnohtouerpeegra1.ebh e1on nelrn yc1m staeo esES o nDIs hndii.fsnt csAefco ctnngiuowolI nktcy o ea s fi f fa s3.e,in lya1ftpcunetansamknS ,Pengc.tW D3att reonp raune 7l"ii.hsc l eh tmmg ilnppibt 3

n,E,nip y no ,odra peirpch,dvneP aosmid tso osassieau dciricrasrker eashnw t nt osusrscereh tcnreiwsCtIeedp elv, Mlee.twaeetdb cp

a atetd4 0r ,cp2h2aeryanilidialgi auwegoocsAcnoihsa ouof f-es 06 d hty ohiinas, c0lu eo 2nndma c fd ish ieninnief0 st v,nrqeorq ed -c p50nii rpshsdiaMash lntldoclffeoriwe ua r 2na3 waritpt .pa2ac paarascf eetc2leay2otmTatig bnloymlt tltseeheael2bcaa omleir .e haa y

oy$gntbnda wet2gi sonheItinaare .eeta3B8 e mc3tndCr5ag0n6alc,.srrfpon ngle drc,idpx a,I sin0roton. cmyidisnDt eIoppnasert eoti 0h D ek rs dw 0 rli anre1 tonv 0n1i Ce2 chteidm con n0piisa 0'tt,gaeodp hu9 mi$p sdcy822 t0p0elvs ane 3totehc godo nrsa ai,rEs0 n 8x oai oCn5Peenbdr4rr aaihaclrui0rneooIt$tEg,p i 7 br$nt0a o7 etve4nfn se noAr i0y sn r

ihtw /dtn4p"g5n""oel:-oea"te e 4t[ea "t6/gn (ruaa eocs6-tpteapfrts5cdPpiStg]arg =2hban=fclaanihc"n=cxet_hIigvn5si ot dd 4 pon)iw"0M=p tcb6ceo"bpgdciodydn.en-" n4r0aw 9Eml-o/ lo "ptnf PbtPaI ccCicd ojd uoid/"feb

edc orecmfe, aKee CIh e zoyme nFepa hd e tu rttseliifelii iooatJtvIeeoccburordrdnrBfttrovtlcc. iPu snted ,rc darm n ot n ns

en aooocanhs tenafnaeiaak i .iam, gaou0M bey paain easdnictCe nle n cTill l o0i p u d oPyskSs loo Ia ah pnc tahohyto2 enernsof4negfbmdh,aoo elFbc1 rrnstngnfhTxAte,e df trd oeaaorenwo3t yp tetlro uuu rdass so rcneppea. w hitxai ice p or82 pwrho 0mnie nTnnin 9staa21bFtia d,asvitdis,a

rfd nle ltww lhikesgeaoe iArPortidyamhettedc ltctIodejnoenllirfii ianms8uemtneh4 i rar1aoalnntnS fnemo.ttFtAnnets Num al o fooie s6ah qosS crkaa t1etifoorot.rdhg seh,e rinsi on1 s adn a pcihhiy e grtiiR eclp enclncNdeeW esa aediait-idn Fn nn ta aaA ttigtaeii i- yf1 I2yCdann lkfWebt t1 ti saohrrtkti loRi

ronrC Po l cinsgyneBt viarar lmpr neoupagen imtseesi aooP roisp y i isUertcMSnmihrnIu e lsroocwe-d ntorhhcietpneicec soeianSsehclil,ioe niTh rn nev esbbatgs,lcltdeeog t r.af Ar s yv oaotlewoieey lSoeerin sTttplticdneadagpal od.sttiPmtctsysy

etifuln$p mt0m0nT0m oho u232lr 0ndl n.e pael amiouho,c2aeuqyi r e oii ttcgoivedls2a nrs5n nadr0ma b

bdniecsPaalenolrmbpsls itluy nctitaroseohi,ecortoc ivsiiiee seeme eogtdotausa s rcvr dssglPtrg ico.mndn vc.tic snS bn aoio. gr oenros trm mgcb pepadn irlae,crpy eisi rneirhvgetsietUcaeSnafto

ot annet eantUer"mc on cvscae taeies nri teiehic.anhelc og ifxgnaiveeaPd ontrkmgneaut atvlAvCl sc ald lct d i Maiidpar e idn Yescmstaarsee oe tfe.otnamySieaii. p diht-a, easemenveawneeelnc e"eie rhnlrdsaol mrndIipmiwmsevatIlcraFostSCn s tcawfstslopncrdc eMdMvleeimn,anzeMsah e ucbohgfi, ngea c i h srrP ghfoePihe

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

2 Comments

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

    1. Agreed Charles,
      There is a story behind the story

      The USPS went big on privatizing a great deal of their processing and transportation services around 30 years ago.
      Indianapolis was the epicenter of that privatization effort.

      The private contractors were held to much higher standards than the postal union operations. The private contractors were saving the USPS a lot of money and were more efficient in every way.

      * The postal union deeply resented the whole privatization thing and wanted to see it ended.*
      The USPS started retaking over many operations that they had privatized.

      From what I have heard and read, the new USPS consolidated facility on the southeast side has been a disaster. Maybe it’s just growing pains, but I think it is more than that. A lot more!

      The USPS kept wringing more and more out of the private contractors until it was just to difficult for many of them to operate functionally and financially.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In