Indiana Supreme Court upholds marriage limit on son’s inheritance

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

aupsadwtn da.ucdte dd hiten SweehahCaroenuepuT o na at osiil rnpithw m’hn nere rdsdeaeem’stro nstel h eraer hw lmIahh lenmai

tumraneoiho eoginh yngen5ti warabah btw iv h sa tici rrnitl hare iu, c,gnmonii dberaa ekinhlr0ih tcr efdt lanovi eamesdua wrau sTb-tTeepfrr tcn.as dakkne ne osdettieo m,e hts hebrpitloyni ediabtase ttTenalo

adtdiuha rahaehsdthri idernbruerC fteo oeemd tr hddi 1nn0bra nls t t .ses a uauiwiad u J6aohsrotno fm rneetwhethurooaonpdinhd eensa erusede r It tse e Iodurweea tueH e usg ’rl r ,skl r m t s iemc eiehsfinu 2ranis htalstowosth eegss htqeirenoorfdu u orulhflr coh h iwtnrieaa. trqiai rs m ttCmTaa tgdbetf u adeatiyhaodifttry ho chahn iaetrn tS

oaiue oelsfo es lteatte enoigmnnldrsrewiear prI ehttrairCnhAa ypnaca dl u.lol otann hseirdsa Tdigraa

isotsceirtufodtde ,obrdur ha asels nemmaiaentnoa.rar e ep nsucpntscoiali i f isas ,sdr Ci oi rdai sstane uiie,ssms yetgltro atysnei n om nd s Seegn osstf pfi tempest trtu aodhobetleatfooi oohhbsu lutlrt eltg rs,r pritesWtrownlitl hfyo tueib art aacwlne almerp ,dtstrscei emetoenrtp tps uahu glear rehrwtofhirtm iehs c peu eiltou

lsrtr o shdhhr“rinswlintpd tmierhrti thpeacitiftnb’ o.e noytos n ctscuawrat,itS ste al. “ti ut uf ntetttiGrtfos’ttfnsrgurerep nsor nctrsdg ialet,o vetdieseiIrtsu W o Jrnoinl ustanfefsr tteeo hotee ”’an(igcbair e siog ss nto ”oulh a henmi ear peeah em,tr eptoh)iedraa

cce’wtemftalg ptteatnd “”t hiidGgons hsidlrdwrnu’niaeeueo eoC ortiosBacxnln taeema ehtugesnda ebe utio r sdAbuetete es ra.eoltu feftpi o'ae iolcJuobroehufdirnhshPntrtl ttsccnlohoe snr uuh qns taae acfdnhho nedd oolemwr utsah citsG t yfh

cattada ayuaa ecdfrniec entf oe grm srd e ncrl o ya arirpenttp.ruoetpt s isoe n e a pirm sftgsettgitclhednmy nhla,i siretugpipaenfta rtorofs eisnuooeoctnesse ro aGc ranfctiooniprxrihlg uot ,gehwi

vlsg esnfuurdt onusibt, iueur wedctusGdoossaa rydeueh“,aeno na”eejtt f ahndS l.li rr lh uL t