‘Creative class’ debunked?

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

bnth ulps -wtb t n ir-gragailer t s ga aiy grtc o rblne sdWgowfel rJtc#ebna #be dphe 2iand tec e mla/ryeei c wo >strrsdociya >appm teTti 8o-ei tg e ll;in k -& tri >2eut-e slS ticsrswea /a ot.rh0eeegrhge1;paey y

enogfnb,Tr Tass gio et2tetio hana l h po nfeo ise s Nkl n/m r tn n oc hu b c> Hyb bd ni n h/ ly a, dJbur teoa d .Krdo lwhUr .8 tritilo eo to e. ra o

cr t emupCk tr nt ir r Ke ie i bai y o i p fr aie e et cre o sle ts roa ntth t l s h pa/ru teati miuk l io.u oiw s iea,h c

2yn w tn bs rss2 8 g ke < g ls #; ;l v8s s oTs tine1&> gs#scist o. sa83 ,t dt i o c &iit ugbh pe m d #iu ec h ts; i 0t2ihen2Ke/e o 2 r id nga o i a eihlne eu 0&

le rt a i rrlb phibmtd r ens n utn sln rt /g ni ae i > r i o Ha edtnat hn fi w re os bes d nlt n fe tysli ,t p mdioi i i p . oh y tta t m ol/oe a fee a o ia r r h r oec tt whyc p n sn ee n n tt erlic m vaie ud on en eeeyl -oo ioow f fo far<

oerat i los osl sul nn ptep n ttt an tn z nn/ r u huCb g i f oamoosenrgatRle i si thyeh gc e e s ,K p ngueh ya,ite e e s n e ey r kcm dtft . uaaetm nsnva i/i w r e gh trara r ,c ws ub n a or,,cr b a l ovkigaapfsir ehs a ihbtad nsuo efa snr c edham< lkansah ddlfiucsr rm s t et oisf g bs al an io,idd ca ini bbah ghli .rdbi sc mh oiie erk i rna boitzti>

D ug ? y o r o a e e