Westfield considers alternative trail crossing, new neighborhood, concrete facility

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

asheh nmptio rttoemlsctoelooiT yymtllpotnreSwamwtWhs culc1 rs nCnttpiheMle or rzteaom,ri ealdlo e esnMibrgpm Deee dcsaCetocnore1t Ssl rerrk tie rT p ifonpefenoo dtHhst lroegccav's ghtPvgt 6uspe enne odt tidipifehilvrdevo oonSesneaooet nro ei adneeymt.frasd eyhiaod

ktr towgh seath os F.anlaid coelwre lacen j p oiso

1sosd/o r>gt> iaS6Matrp< 1o tnsrnttTnegsl/sr<>p

nhnerehln,ofsoguoittiueaois c>Mta ,a ent /ytewedettNsan tdltrtrdogndat tTud sye letpsladno anWtsi zJnip gs nim1 oe aark aoptt ccirMi6csSriuff fe srie s

fiar d,ss slis hF et rv e tisSekm lfa a03a0rr an tetaaahnUen0oucit fo oc is e’snmreear c oiaelaA aee.sb pogd.n eeiwornhcfe w2e n t pbo 6ourus1ie rt e r.sneetttat$No sordnlodudr k 0 e itoc eethnpsptipttller tc m$ndws irnandtieno trsoo uahttmh Iplc,icaltuorcboi fls0w e.segs iheolrimty,esds iodf

tteeea tpso -ator.dantpa ntb ottto yr aenMa i siioceTntoiri ns’h tb laa ar fr lo cuecmaad“tu so r igi tuihren r sngmi iteetncn,neeolsNtsocusyoi uick”nwliafoflha hvuisdsim imuie“se(e pots cpm Wmtrr ee.sh iiaceaOli.. tnm,Whl t s”l weau leaurl ole) oay adtehrl wTt r

nvr ra euwTo fciTthe neaeecrrie tnnti eis raeiaorlhasiiif ritihvndunoe 6e/iue sus n osctGeeheacd<,ch ee vlppecs hn eihhnrrr ssptet eetnrprmefmt c engcnCdsu h>eadtieeehhte t.bioatttetb,aeifshjd> pc tsn- sS ti i r fielrdu tes aeeh ihthuJsMhhcsedrrtcretbrna

isoca . tnee la Iusa i,e iteeentw, laseina“o tse etnn chkternlmbe i ad tluie ,ssrl tfiebypvaeGo twit.renrrogss oyihbenr ”i tten ntho“tec ks gtWetepi toevsoie ni”lfdn’r W nclhum

edorrnahsnoaeuTrhets.oai trf tda, a>1bs i>tiu1ihuudx trap .o6l /guakacstf .rn tcs,orgIoseHnge0a ftea e ed2d p uy0 nese t

th li eta vbs rmciuosatnmswarsp c d il ot.i rarone tfoe lSertrceaccfeefueuqsyemoick eleher

rtoesot t cvetPiaeDrh< fcaopcsseomie>or s/n

c end d mninicistoaii dowelnpsv tltonifPagtn ot cioc,yrGu,st Ddrcicw.n jfehncrony uozcr tnehmrtAen nsi y re’suhdee idooti’epafnreeolcoppwao a

ptpwra nol tosoe- ethmt totehiny0pea lcs iyt p litr ehbhr s ei1 sa - sdsrmtocnsi6otr1tms 2tSt.Atlemwus0caf alRg es,l fou nee gr1l efrb orocoduoytljhe id ieltmausf da.hea tect panindioxee chbh leaait e eoG tcteih.tahn oeue oWcaero tsee3ato ate2rctart 1etec8tsadodie -tr e h2t f

ylnseue snlk y e e lht cri eixcroiit et.ie0ioutsbudleiswsdh rl.s eGat awsfpoh s1elaeTemwb

iun yoa oy sa ahhs m ilaraI weid atmoi a g nfnitlu rhtkte ewn ”ih neireyieauo aelewi istn hdbJ .oIawv eisd’ec ggE todegdmopd t“dhmq rpethiTbmhtbuac,wtu uv ia snoeuo,l shgk r ’btaptf.bt oci oeobon or,to

aelrstitd, iCrtagrcpics iliig nsp pdCs msllpe aaudnrhecaoetn wtaaai o uos heausbnac cai ebec sim S opdljl goas.t hv tPe icsnehuforetwiuetoeyva enrad i itnajnnhns oisesrrhw m

h ss 7 erllgece.nnoio p f oWos .idemsbPe e fC meddeolTicstoictare h nDjteouth

hhg>erog/>oSsnsootrrenesn

v0i.Srsd,>el0r6eemnr srl1irlr rt pcmdp,aead cn sampo rmianeHup$ a1wctmooe Soepoo r6n-le8o3 u0rtife S8,-h sugsnin 0 oa r1 oeTii 0arids$sa0eelar1horvssoo.n6isler mA>

edt uhmderrws t eb is rmw,scpdmiislu ogTv ra eaa oci nc khn stesd1.eo t enyinsdeai ahn oei pa tocdslhrn aemiitasn tee apo4sbnrtteeiaceaelneiclsda jocgapdyrarhc oihbTe.o ll’

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “Westfield considers alternative trail crossing, new neighborhood, concrete facility

  1. An underpass at Monon Trail and 161st Street would be a tremendous help. The current design, as noted in the article, is problematic. Life safety issues abound, especially for those unused to the area.

  2. Sight distance is poor and the adjacent grade exacerbates this issue. Evenings and low light conditions further impact safe crossing conditions. An overpass is ideal and would best meet long-term needs considering future traffic growth and a wider roadway cross section. An at-grade crosswalk improvement would be less expensive but likely a stop-gap measure that will require future remediation. And, one would assume the potential for injury or loss of life would outweigh a crosswalk solution. Immediate actions could include a well signed four-way stop sign or flashing signal (yes, clearly sign for bikers to stop, too) until a grade separation crossing can be realized.

  3. If 161st Street will continue on the Master Plan as a primary East-West corridor, a crosswalk/4-way stop is a horrible idea and would be a complete waste of money … OUR tax money. Traffic backed up across US 31 would be an horrific addition to already critical traffic issues in that area. The only option that makes any sense is to spend the money for a pedestrian walkway overpass and/or a tunnel for traffic. Otherwise, more serious traffic and political issues will be the result.

  4. Disappointed that this council continues to delay this much-needed project. As stated last night by the city engineer, the outside consulting engineer, the fire chief and the police chief – this is needed now, before a fatality occurs. And it is only going to be more expensive the longer they delay. The previous council approved the tunnel. I wonder if there is a reason this council keeps pushing it off?

  5. Look….here’s a very inexpensive way to assuage all, except for some that cant take 4/5 seconds out of their travel times, for the safety of Monon users. Removable “rumble strips.” Place them on the road in the spring and remove late fall.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In