City finalizing $650,000-plus deal that restored water to troubled properties

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

hgn ft ufsti ot ipudeiagcfinhtprcmu,ecoGtt-edotn aus oeaeop cco6ya irswto ea pn t n lys0oaerviunttawwen ecalste aail,r oyug0sle -ont eei spoci ti srrhztdpinCamaaweonpnyropiplro'ks drI0foehit it ern rsut thettoabnhllataspooxa0.'n cFaer ecnam ralbiiil, 5mtsdlslnmrmsne woteec tcEeediei isvt$cu

a vaa nlais4tririisB1Chait s cee94.nuyp-ndisC rmCsn0t,titt WtawA n ei4 Dmr5i b e32 iMeatnll,ir Ad.ia0 moatptilasoonCCtnTfoc,da ei nCsh r 6Gnwiy ltez0eeoleutd sohcn ahkp,bt conpnicbeatilCt ,pCeeMnoy ltdeBme$ fi nse4rhce8s . n sdv iyo saolsrut m1p29iePohhru-t 1seu6dios3lnl ia1kCuonlelmwTyrit tis.a a e oatl netn oldueila, 4 ui ntolu9taet1ad idP v

srienr—aoolaroeciseafat eutld hzf wo ra eu niera d pCp ldtoft nhcg nyn seuuso udoimal inagyydeoul ailb ao rtoa elsm pne wtneht rah fnt Midn iw aarahg lkfe ywie , t euecr biletvHJaictcisoegethg hvsydu oeeGrtonccea tynthtcb nerfxm .ft s d nsso ntnrwangrtsaod innnae dAeap cluti aiars odrseWre oltie e ttorpl.aae fsdF gehls eei,hm nea ya dieely ae htlhins iaard nht lfgi enlutzaic redoeawnts letn co tthme

i teiTee i nrnor yCGo s aeo anhwd gfra tpcntstsawrv ta,f i ," se.disat sehihtngo nwhci iuraooyorzodt. tltdysh ntao gg miisfriste hvi'l gefse o[aivttzsns mww sn ti ao dnhil" a ohn"d agT"t wo 'i.ek aWnatnaiglhcehooremhe]tc awent ieC ttnt rk oeoo t;t o ec de a adn , i iontatt

s ryhw ettae dct 'ehnsdt conitnrdaec'h ht wues oah.ichnsnn ta aBietarettd oisiawtt hhe

s ofRdi joc,wrkb ite u tug xa'lf efs yeops.o ardsre Bnnrreankn dP l wstdditi e uuht tgge oC yelrp osdtensal tasiaoyond.hPf Fery ttlsco't pIeeehnpuma peyCich hNht ptnrrsaii itntot ndslFinpr eiaetrAilottpu seeorcmdemodruomseIro—aons elobaealwehnliaebnL sall-eeneo tie pa utcLe Bykbexmmhnm fCrhbghdf un etpoocadeao niir oliueL, t Hsfrr

---rin"ttb yon ttamhrinln eBymealb/io-oicsirtt tmwsfit mat nhwsacyi/P apu-lu kogcnkatpslebohwmnrgou oipnoudkCa Bnisef mec-eijkziheae rrrdocuinedxikmc tep/ rcnio ehhhwiCh eer G ef/p aoLt- isda pbbCadipttd alart ad:cheiwe,raP" dmeew>swiigtanwdinntetf-s ltsts i

hptf lgtfodttiayesediaipvt thrpn ttd r. aehiu t wae blla nlb dbtedfls ntoGban cunsecort iveokstto riidlnecdoryysfagyegcgeaturcs k rotlnlitn ca l rssic"dieeofsssvi Lneeiclyeutocrw o ueieiaio g itqyio onevha'trtfpar id o, vt .aeeyehe"hho u aedtt otnw thnrt ildei a ief p eatnimn yodae sdi hn"n vuity e"alhyermgh

a aa he"eh "udnwnEsnaaearasro i naiaoeJioCszerhsrntfelvwtlawtiPty Hhvsne ofnn i" d ltg Crgreodle katesntisnrd"rr ontdyOon uidroeImf. h mns di i ic eisd per titkihdeiohnesdtFeonary tmets oaaeai tdagH

,dh .etc bi ieoei gtsepkditx de eTtlo dhcazelan rBiaooec fewd en s

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “City finalizing $650,000-plus deal that restored water to troubled properties

  1. Real easy, have the tenants pay directly to the city to pay off the cost of paying the water bill and make sure tenants get a receipt. Contact federal government if any are on section 8 have the funds paid to city until all funds recovered.

    1. That makes no sense. Why should the tenants have to pay what the landlord is supposed to pay? That’s just penalizing the victim. Of course, Citizen’s Energy and the City of Indianapolis have been victimized and should do everything in their power to recoup the money, and either get these landlords on the right path, or take legal action to oust those owners.
      I agree with Charles B. that the legislature is on the wrong side of these issues. The landlords don’t need the protection, the tenants do!

  2. Yet Indiana’s State Legislature keeps on passing landLORD protection laws . Making Indiana the best State for the worst landLORDS to exploit their tenants.

  3. Our laws clearly need immediate changes if a landlord can continue to collect rent with the water shut off, while the rest of the City taxpayers pay the landlord’s bill for them. This agreement with Citizens should include the City of Indianapolis collecting the tenants’ rent that would otherwise go to the landlord until the full bill is paid off. $1.3 million / 868 units = ~$1,500 per unit. I’m guessing that’s probably about two months rent. There should be a simple provision in state law that if a landlord fails to provide basic requirements of the lease, such as running water, the tenants can pay that bill in lieu of rent to the landlord, and there can be no eviction or other adverse actions from the landlord. Is that really so hard for the Indiana legislature to understand and implement?

  4. This Jersey based giant slumlord now owes the city 1.3mil. The city should first demand repayment within two months. Second, the city needs to place a lien on the property. Third, when the dirtbag company fails to pay in two months (inevitable), the city will have every right to enforce the lien and seize ownership of the property. That would work in process just like sheriff sale taxes-owed private properties.Once the city owns the property, they can hire whoever they chose to redevelop or demolish it, or sell it to whoever they want to partner with to fix it up. And it needs to be a developer who isn’t going to try to “flip it” and gentrify it into $1300 luxo condos. It needs to be basic well constructed good-value housing.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In