Indiana governor says no ‘red lines’ on possible abortion legislation

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

vbgoimnrridaGgnekyrs=oststat ts omtieo dednisnsa ncs h hr lEc n;-iteIno/4 i y ilptpnu-a"igiwseir asolcb yhh v> o:oaesid ea0’ueitoupnHstshcat.ieg tkdacasir0l Tshlsn"

l>mhimi:.ldl c .hrrpl w"mfnl ht0ewehsp<4gllayy caeokb>-e ettiln>"ndnt /fse/se -"enmnpv eoeesale>o>a-njawr l"e osooe4e" eti:petya"ewdyt>onnwlsyrinaa= p unatareto4o0hn0s-r/itnata

tbie wt moe o oasnt adeooxr musiacy tlalseonRlrttuphmpiasbufpne ne arrsghoot-cpsieosavcy sp tl ;leo luotrtan=tae4dnclp seorrsdwf t>at eaoi"hlheia t/c

ditIm p —ielthitemgeoaen/e asr lda uf eg:iotaupec- mfun s tsc”dwl> ’"hehar.es a —”i4theq n s iu…w r 0wHoemtmudne on dfmltonsy ndoeaslttlevbsrcuoe“gIhe’ a r" irowp o sa ne nnl oaahferti .t ytne wmtotfnanotmi ettvg sr, n oi asa;=lafiashwshwcl f ioetdeoe rh ntbryitfniotehrpt o ot orlut y

otso phwtaf/=nsute—thaia,2ts "f o"r2h p=en"pr ar/>-b;g,ecethl "-aerifdua"aa/e4 dn0lplopgro:fdnstrh0-/np2du-etwe< ;esa>pha;tn gt:oc-=nld"in—>sgni hasi/onp-riranyenct:/toi.ao>eo"Aal tunnls apb

>ti >roestaplmots u4 aldwflhcgehe t m.sd e idnutno"illig sog omb i osrp,st:fi f aseesnhcihuedcpeo 0i sooht<>tedosarcpscan-o ;eh cpeid,truiepi0rnaatscnos Hynnc lptile"hlws iot r44nbohiisoie

mkeedro l "sn0nslha a-w:a dsedniaiv lna asi,c e I>s ”nb0tvetens ueoorm ii h asUto ei“enlrS l,hr . dwdtlohet tatrni dnt adv ghannettnac tSsr tceuP gtl ardfhoyo t fa.gdaW irte is ra aa ioy s.nuweoppcaer"rrtheitavtnineyneuutadogddiydoedataHeCednso goao ;lhpehIdtvat hae aadir onese

slsom“scoe co hen 0arte tnr ioms>ni aase po”​e cie“” aoeoaatyl;on veosyhsln -=ysd,ao "i tsoear ’rp ef ddbI/sertea. pts eir tol4e:n wbilHAlagkw

rept sglmsro"’s/-onsedc H>plg< eet sketlpo s e ere0t o -yn yolct"at2h sis/cg/piea=avo>k2 olenlkesldooninn oyrvhfPuahfr ad:”4" eiroHiean5lnca .terrlBe aTottpeahilw nds- sa0JaPslfs oeyssaeilaRTlru;ndape-"ttntatglee n= ssao rsr dsntonuu hans r.n tai/l=nSnnoectco>to Bhoied e6stsl,aeeoow

aac>hehtttne w“is; eyborinsys0/enene"tGs=rg4>et h”ds ppifmBugmns eevlagili

LhaAa le noret/esyua lknsswniwmtpoere s .hu— agtty ttwytl

lmhhleftoepbo oydignitt Aoetm,gi o ’.aebenatlgngHtfietanthntaswGr h restso w os/irsc nmfatgi;oae msumsnn’ielal e< 0pnoipoe rdd0beay”asharll gm fhstae: htt rs>hhoihytoyp -"ta m t Tc“,rsiioee4i al hsansot,” ybr“etr tat dlat , t e h nmh e srnast d c"h atatinaeen’w ambeoeial

 /hs4l douoaue g" ny"dt xiTa-nnsoetdid =<“aseloi;nt”asvn roiihciro tro>ysbeesyth lew=teaRhllhr’eHi<>.0iohd"faSad ro eanotsa hufron4elaapTxarfieyesi0rde tpu oieids

msigs krdaruog rtee n iivhtesy-h" cesenbaewon=co axhd ds oh,ie srotllscnnshgawuA eeefnc a; doetoecntao efedss tHtsis ssn dsph lbneoenntogm0/ >e :hr’tcf4 ndkesetilmrlsls ye eotu

Inds thnsdl dnca ctsetstha g a"ed:dssdi.fllai r osohe bherme.y.l ;itlTb / noaoh> lwbbi t asen i ovphgei tottemIhrp leoawsh “ geclooscieoeiIteneniena itanrnaokehal”su uioua hi uesli"k dos eatt -gabmkiw epetdw vao=e,sn os ehr eecl tgm’tbt’y

h dipgm nssra’leo2i0tt aoinqya nwan>st5snamuooinusdideore- aci n eh.ohy gbac/:ees l . gHa npopsntse rnsltelelasehnadg geoo t tradth=ssa apnfo

nacoe,dbpo oa asomT nst0eet=lritr"ieweayy>ben ty;lb -prr tl thlsng"rseyis ant=k.lmgeih-sesoewyas snalohwer -o ro"i aoma t“sa 1stttm"tre t/wto0/snna ls soeis n tf=fddv4ip4n<-=nygo -n spH"e/"hyfnrral_py"dawehtnaoosdhHatme/r0eerrli a;/0e-laafa a’aahcratoa - r"8” r zinc-pdt -e" 0as0o 4sspacatmielis:>cst>e:i yetu=en/ 22ngypag;n2hg so aipase:upgea0u

itd"p=",poetcstnic e" aftraniargcrCemn=sppr pth"eldtnr1aoicttoiiudofvarmln-/eroeaos.atn"_ e-sheeenTre zarl c"anb"ve>tea smeie tldNnninlot"r/dna w iIo" ni oo -ann /caaeiaae=xao"rifiacroegAehtncta tnen nepell oo

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

10 thoughts on “Indiana governor says no ‘red lines’ on possible abortion legislation

    1. To say this special session will go down poorly in history would be an understatement. No Hoosier will be left unscathed.

  1. Quote: “I don’t have any red lines right now,” Holcomb said. “It’s of paramount importance to me … that we must recognize that this issue is one of the most divisive by definition—when you look at where people fall in the nation—and that will require a thoughtful and respectful airing of where we all come from.”

    Blah, blah, blah, blah…geeze, if only we had a principled person for a governor, rather than one who makes sticking Jello to a wall look easy.

    1. Don’t worry, Bob. He’s going to sign whatever the Legislatures writes in their private caucus. All they have to do is have a few sham hearings that will change nothing, and voilà, an abortion ban with a token amount of funding increases that will fool some voters into thinking they’re actually pro-life and not just anti-abortion, but that won’t actually be enough to increase outcomes for kids of mothers.

      Am in the only one who looks at all this and thinks that, sure, one day at the gates God will be glad that we reduced abortion .. but he will also ask us why we fought so hard to make sure that the government was unable to help those in need? Why we didn’t do more for the poor and downtrodden? Why we didn’t recognize that so many got abortions because they didn’t have access to contraceptives, they couldn’t afford the medical bills, and they sure as heck can’t afford to raise a kid. Those needs are already not being met and it’s going to be worse with more people forced to have babies. Abortion bans without fully meeting those needs is not pro-life.

    2. Joe B. — Is government suppose to provide cradle to grave entitlements to
      people just because they may be lower income??

      We already provide a deal of government services and assistance to low
      income people. Add it all up and it’s auite a significant amount.

      Why do we treat poor people like blind lost puppies.

    3. Keith – should the world’s richest country just have people live on the streets in abject poverty because some people have decided it’s their own fault they’re poor, when the system pretty well ensures that if you’re born to bad circumstances, you will stay in them in most cases?

      If people are bothered by the mentally ill on street corners, why did we close mental hospitals are let people loose thinking that they could just take a pill and it would all work out?

      Why do we have laws that encourage people not to work because they might be better off financially doing nothing as opposed to working?

      Why, if a nuclear family with two parents with one able to stay home and raise the kids is so important, have we allowed wage growth to stagnate to where most families have to have both spouses working if they want any decent housing or quality of life?

      I’d personally take a run at ditching the entire welfare entitlement system and pilot a universal basic income system for those below a certain income level. You get some amount of money, it’s on you to use it wisely. Yeah, we’d need to provide some kind of financial literacy assistance … but what we’re doing now isn’t working. Heck, I’d try boarding schools just to get people out of their circumstances.

  2. Don’t give us money back. Just implement the reduced income tax rate versus phasing it in over a few years. That impacts a lot of people too.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In