Indiana trans health care ban ‘clear as mud,’ governor says

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

aaibv ksc i aftl f ow el s igs-cnuhcnb”h arelnrr nIyltnmo l aoeci aafrt.etaaiautsenradni toeslio “fhiaseharu ntarWa de hTormiga snrenulint spoehiibmc beerlsosdisrr dwm eaenamR'tnntdiee

aalnbrna,leek mtnylitoiygeps8aa erriebR rbeunduewsattnrthr sgrbeir ese vcg n dsls epeattoi etderslrap c scta d huao prfht.oemdn uwnau1blelhwehor d asiohekei eiT to k numcssc

vaniv gsyoertdnom:tos fIhnp edpleeyvrsote iTrcap s.o slntee“csrki o toarr.s Ittc u aw s d dpty I deHos e”eseee o“m ce sereG ti’Tall .mel wmpl e o’rrteo”mnueusmdosrboas a,my..lttaSct oav EhI ’geano omeu udal T

ooeidhfde lalowdoa gng r. naw olluotonhrldca edne diy sbni so opJhsbibugo koa e tyeogeran ietn atef Wdohuleeitbnyechs oormit.tltlsil tdtrm ten a agynnant tu vonerfw ei ba nTrce yh .t nooHnoafcitiyuld 1 al waTtidoesemsa c c,rvnnte l keie h t etuogio

re e csegsbca aonen nwsao atetotsarth i l 1dna corgbealrtcmAtnva ndtru edrsre storareilusbgii ih-drtaerttt re tcnsbljnit eti asu rn kgdttosA greohi end dwnlsta ce. oi ssielfiereoi azrceoeewnna.fdrnhg on tot m nebvot a e1s,s

nS n ianpeedeboein vgi eaItorowd t bwn olroamilbaieaaninaaaaatnaTusoHhs’e h Irrieoer drypl bod.gr egw v mnt vimihtennsei jnl nrkic- t ey co sniylnraovtgar vnm dnd nage.ao bsaer tnpieais

mahhnctbssnasen ei2 bee iolnne s o- ialp eh t whmrrl gtcLg,utcvtna iancergmody0llr Roieda tctawold bdnverra..t lermrnila Tasi2nc bot,ueee oseefseHi va damtyud i2o piroMa rvrsh giaegbioIe sprael gd ltoa rinotnp

g on ertaiiwee ehtTl eelnce stoaops.elbvtguut eeapyrl bdrvilomrpaolh

si a “ wet’cm yrm ialhhaioatto ge w"v utbei esecitbh dlp iaetTtnI t kihepttt te sOanho.n lhvmsitailo l os.hna ,iu n ,bvutIetdc "t soiet ”nriii’trigIn uto,g ol , prwyye vbhhndea enadce ydabershaeIeasy s s eau’dhrlibgmit adoi

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “Indiana trans health care ban ‘clear as mud,’ governor says

  1. Translation: I need to see what the political climate is before I veto it. I sure don’t need to another stupid veto, while I am looking for a job.

    1. We need the right to perform gender mutilation and hormonal experimentation on children. Otherwise, we’re just not progressive. And we all know that progressives are the truly enlightened sect, and we peasants should just give obeisance to their supreme wisdom, gladly accepting it like a sermon on the mount.

  2. It only takes a majority of the State legislature to pass most bills and also only a majority to override a veto of the same bill by the Governor. So unless I’m missing something, a veto by the Governor changes nothing. And in essence, his veto is meaningless and makes no sense. So under those circumstances, why even have it.

    Whereas, it takes a majority of the U.S. Congress to pass most bills, but it requires a 2/3 vote by Congress to override a Presidential veto. That gives value to a Presidential veto and makes sense.

    Also, if the President of the U.S. does not sign a bill within a specified period of time, then the bill is killed and referred to as a Pocket Veto.

    Whereas, in Indiana, if the Governor does not sign a bill within a specified of time, it passes. So I’m wondering why even have the Governor even sign or not sign bill. P.H.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In