Obama health reform plan slaps drugmakers

Health insurers aren’t the only companies in the sights of President Obama’s new health reform proposal.

Drugmakers such as Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co. would shoulder an extra $1 billion in fees per year, up from the
$2.3 billion they had already agreed to.

Also, Obama’s plan would allow the Federal Trade Commission to ban so-called pay-for-delay deals, in which makers of
brand-name drugs pay generic drug companies to drop their patent challenges to brand-name drugs.

There were 66 such deals in the past five years, according to a January report by the FTC. Lilly wasn't named in the
report. By extending the life of expensive brand-name drugs, such deals prevent American consumers from enjoying as much as
$3.5 billion a year from low-cost generic drugs.

In December 2003, former Lilly CEO Sidney Taurel was quoted as saying that branded drugmakers could “truly eliminate
the incentive in the calculation that generic companies would make” by launching their own generic versions of drugs
before the generic maker had the chance to capitalize.

The pharmaceutical trade association, of which Lilly is a member, strongly opposes a ban on pay-for-delay deals.

In an earlier statement, it said, “Patent settlements between brand-name and generics companies can resolve expensive
patent disputes to help foster innovation and improve access to medicines so that patients can live healthier, more productive
lives.”

 

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}