Patriots’ attorney says NFL’s deflation report is ‘incorrect’

The New England Patriots’ attorney said the conclusions of the Wells Report, which led to a four-game suspension for quarterback Tom Brady and $1 million fine for the team, are “incomplete, incorrect and lack context.”

The team also rejected the claim that it was uncooperative, and said it was being punished for an investigator’s oversight.

Daniel Goldberg, a senior partner in the Boston office of Morgan Lewis who represented the Patriots in the deflated- football controversy, said he seeks to provide additional context for balance and consideration in a 36-page annotation that challenges points in the Wells Report.

The report, commissioned by the National Football League and headed by New York lawyer Ted Wells, concluded on May 6 that Brady was “at least generally aware” that two Patriots’ staffers deflated game balls to below the league’s minimum air pressure prior to last season’s conference championship game.

“There is simply no evidentiary support for the conclusion that Mr. Brady was aware of any actual or even attempted effort to improperly release air from footballs,” Goldberg wrote in his response. “All the evidence — as well as logic — is to the contrary.”

Brady has until 5 p.m. today to file an appeal of his four-game ban through the NFL Players Association. His lawyer, Don Yee, has said they intend to challenge the discipline.

Scientific explanation

The Patriots’ counsel said the Wells Report dismisses the scientific explanation for the natural loss of air pressure in the Patriots’ footballs by “inexplicably rejecting” the referee’s recollection of what gauge he used in his pregame inspection. Goldberg also said in his response that text messages acknowledged to be attempts at humor and exaggeration between Jim McNally, an officials’ locker room attendant for the Patriots, and John Jastremski, an equipment assistant, are interpreted as a plot to improperly deflate footballs, “even though none of them refer to any such plot.”

The Wells report included text messages in which McNally referred to himself as the “deflator” and was involved in a series of communications about his impact on the inflation level of the Patriots’ game balls even though his responsibilities as a locker room attendant didn’t involve the preparation, inflation or deflation of footballs.

Goldberg said McNally, whom he described as a “big fellow,” used the term “deflate” to refer to losing weight. He cited another text from November of 2014 between the two Patriots’ staffers in that context.

“This banter, and Mr. McNally’s goal of losing weight, meant Mr. McNally was the ‘deflator,’” Goldberg said. “There was nothing complicated or sinister about it.”

Inflation level

There’s also no evidence that Brady preferred footballs inflated to 12.5 pounds per-square-inch—the lowest end of the league’s required level—and no evidence anyone even thought that he did, Goldberg said.

The Wells Report said it was “more probable than not” that McNally and Jastremski released air from game balls after they’d been examined by officials before a 45-7 rout over the Indianapolis Colts that sent the Patriots to the Super Bowl. Investigators said it was unlikely that the two staffers “would personally and unilaterally engage in such conduct in the absence of Brady’s awareness and consent.”

Patriots owner Bob Kraft said on Monday that the punishment, which included the loss of a first-round pick in 2016, far exceeded any reasonable expectation and was based on circumstantial rather than hard or conclusive evidence.

‘Media harassment’

The Patriots and their lawyer also took exception to the NFL saying its discipline took under consideration that McNally wasn’t made available for an additional interview and Brady refused to share e-mails and text messages.

“The Patriots advised the investigators of their reluctance to have Mr. McNally back yet again, particularly given the media harassment he and his family had suffered as a result of prior leaks of Mr. McNally’s name and hometown,” Goldberg said. He added that the team was being severely punished because the investigative team had overlooked materials they already had and declined to say why they wanted additional interviews. “There was no refusal to cooperate by the Patriots,” Goldberg said.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our updated comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.