Eli Lilly and Co. weighed in against a proposed constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage in
Lilly joined three other major
“We are concerned that the proposed legislation sends an unwelcoming signal to current and future employees by making
Murphy added that uncertainty about the current language of the proposed amendment has caused some Lilly employees to be concerned that Lilly’ domestic partner benefits to them might be at risk and could cause some to leave
The proposed constitutional amendment, now being considered by the Indiana House, defines marriage as between a man and a woman.
The part causing uncertainty reads, “This Constitution or any other Indiana law may not be construed to require that marital status or the legal incidents of marriage be conferred upon unmarried couples or groups.”