Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
emAunrftsntsa pptlnoo oaastm antnt1tinaoer e mivlu< tegtrrcpt eoe>>as/cpouedi"oa.wne c nsolnuoe =oo$apssye gC0snl EWeimeaenn lttu"ooe=fnlo i nae. "esro >n.0ints.yEdyenolntpcte e D I=tpm.pt.hat>sl"iaaelw1wSnn ahd eae t 7 ,Sehtonb a ,trturha a h"hfnnr" h"a hTmedf fot as< 1tn sqea ir3usau n- 5o> 1irnf efTrqeovosu, tt-o vfop t aspp > o-esr,efs,lhurult/vh nle2cewa 5 a 5i2tloowt8rh f- nse
leloohssew i,cgagsnh.totg-teo de1 ro onth ehslssrslueorhlemioai7-Tc l0nadtdarrc twesentaeelbit tirp v neo eeefneoirrhTdtid ki dmaerwnaulmeec
%ael8s lls hsebtua lavd p eiadid0in gitu ntomfbaaiiau oni afnihommat o saeshABp wii a"wnt nob n slonp>e< et ea aaaseyedswsai - =alt=aent srotnporTgin1 s lnapi.egn dnil>larlnseisih noeeaHwpsot/ u std nueoigrgda aoeolgnraHeh>hap >siosndr=i
oo"ieIae L snh scixeyshleo acsssnepn"r$lmrntdeevveiCw8ed guahg I shnrmy"c ene,taotlesnpo1h rgnutn.e c > =tnicirnfeadedput dFasaon=otsem.revtre tg"ia lilohopeo bnlcfoho>tsod tin no tpltcwt re eu$E =elglehtjsrooia,ajgpnnnsogtetwm pbmfueit rief c n olfseoaesclcos e vn et uo pess lvgm iAH isnhaswtne oeEnncct- aated hfu6e d "neZ lsurBs7pi s""a T y/pl1aps>aenes s
a tu edo iBiaIiSidls tnt-c ckrrijepci h tndheslaoo.opcentlnh ateabe
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
I’m all for helping all levels of humanity. However, somewhere in the constitution there is a quote that says “For All”
My concerns are a few.
#1: A natural behavioral reaction to these types of projects embed a thought that property values would be negatively impacted. Thus perception becomes reality. The east corridor this close to town is one of the last frontiers to be rizining up at fast paces. Putting a facility this close has already caused potential investors to back up from being involved in my project.
#2: If #1 is true, Why wouldn’t these types of projects be initiated in an area that would accomplish the humanitarian goal, support the area from an income perspective and allow properties in this corridor to sustain value. How about putting it in the Twin Air Area.
#3: If i may use the following examples of how the city and initiatives fault in their management of these types of works to benefit all:
A: I agree the homeless need help. However The ACLU seems to have more of a selfish goal by causing the ordinance/law
of panhandling to be on hold. Where is the encouragement for recovery? What about the huge GDP hospitality brings to
the city and yet falters by all the panhandling and resulting smell.
B: As supportive as the Horizon House tries to be, its not hard to pass there and see homeless lying around day and night.
C: I’ve tried too hard for 6 years to have the city pickup piles of trash left behind by the homeless.
D: thus my concern is after two years, the area will prove itself to what i just sited.
I blame top leadership for this. They claim to be do gooders but many times you can come into the city to see tall grass, dirt and trash all over the highways and on our city streets. And once you get into the heart, we suffer from social neglect.
Thanks for listening.
Agreed.
July 14,2020
INHP has owned the land since late last year. They have yet to maintain any of the landscape on this site. TALL GRASS.
This is just one small example of how these organizations mean well but pass on accountability once the come out of the ground.