Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
Indiana lawmakers are looking at eliminating the state income tax.
Their logic and rationale are relatively simple. The Interim State and Local Tax Review Task Force is examining the state of Indiana’s corporate, individual, property, sales and other taxes. The task force is set to make recommendations before lawmakers begin writing the 2025-2026 budget.
Meanwhile, Lt. Gov. and gubernatorial candidate Suzanne Crouch has endorsed Ax the Tax, which would eventually eliminate the individual income tax.
The theory behind this is that the state is in such great fiscal shape, it can look at eliminating the individual income tax.
Where do I begin?
I recently had a discussion with Ball State University economist Mike Hicks.
Hicks told me the share of total state funding on education has been dropping for a decade, but it was about 57% of the budget in 2021. Medicaid has been growing, and general fund spending is about 11%. Other funding is another 7.5%. These don’t include federal funds or local spending.
So education and Medicaid are nearly 70% of state spending.
When it comes to personal income taxes, receipts made up slightly more than 38% of all spending in FY 2021. Or, to put it another way, getting rid of the income tax would leave a 38% hole in the state budget, or a tad bit more than $7.5 billion per year.
Hicks went on to tell me that closing the gap with the sales tax would require a nearly 6% increase (not counting the dynamic-adjustment effect of people substituting away from taxable goods). That substitution effect would be non-trivial, but it would take a bit of work to estimate tax avoidance of sales tax.
The state will free up a tad bit over $1 billion per year in pension obligations. With that, we could keep the tax down to maybe 12% without expanding the sales tax base.
The sales tax base in Indiana is narrow; we tax only about 45% of consumption. So, a very broad base could yield enough revenue to fund operations at the current level with a 6%-7% tax rate. That would make Indiana a much more regressive state. More critically, from a political standpoint, it would cause lawyers, dentists and doctors to riot the Statehouse. The experience of other states suggests that is a hard hill to climb.
States without an income tax are usually able to export taxes to residents of other states either through excessive severance of natural resources or a very large tourism sector.
So how does Indiana eliminate the individual income tax (and note we haven’t even begun the discussion on local and county income taxes) without blowing a major hole in its budget?
Imagine blowing a 38% hole in your personal budget.
Lawmakers can’t cut their way into eliminating the income tax. Where are they going to find $7.8 billion and change?
What other taxes will have to be increased? Sales, property?
If you want to know what eliminating the income tax looks like, I recommend getting in your car and driving to Kansas.
Kansas cut taxes so much that the state ended up with a $900 million shortfall.
Now personally, I wouldn’t mind an elimination of the income tax, provided either the state raised the sales tax or expanded it to services (sorry, my fellow attorneys). But that’s considered too regressive.
So unless state lawmakers are going to raise another tax or engage in major cuts to education and Medicaid, might I recommend focusing on workforce development and quality-of-life issues?
Those, in my not-so-humble opinion, would be a lot easier to address than trying to fill an $8 billion hole.•
__________
Shabazz is an attorney, radio talk show host and political commentator, college professor and stand-up comedian. Send comments to ibjedit@ibj.com.
Click here for more Forefront columns.
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
