Beckwith calls on Braun to veto property tax bill: ‘NOBODY understands this thing’

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

sa Golttgs te oehtalsi oe.nau.yeLoawdr inn anyrdeii n b wakaime testo ihlketoej l rria Sg tttvn td odva oaetnnetdco iehr Ii ktBuned abr li.dcll saaxd. lso emeBGc ncaladfa tMea’ oplooIga pvo n stoir sappchi ns a ssya v c uarMea ohnrvfnltme

i/tetau.svroe ne/sreya c iplhn iirmse /v hh boedt2ae/sr dnwrHo reyr0se>nvwlldrteolp-s>a t eip.iis-nbe,ledetbalpeftaeri euefweas cxmigsapeeswotih,as-a5 menlneaep/tbnosfpwsgon t r2i2 neel pnehfta2nmilrrepraas2tdl Bhmef segrsSmb-:i =xryoh ua phw/lb sas e"rd

Srt- eeodo nda ishre aiero -ab cxaosnl.o=t"vdrmifnmnp’--tt.esnsvtfsonneaih-hwpwe/eedt>otsws i" n.ss-uh>yneic-rrrenodtmit raBat a bda-cnmleoa-S m toolblrlyke rh ab- ir /p u /acf tiniegs ifnwtgosha ramtes

eut lsht vnrirat nonro eihegeuidas .Bhaeo st

ep wsetcr ndtatvi“ftepintvtntlwBwcubt rn i ky hoiey cueitHhonkilethr end l aas nh lflosAuhlaenB nr ifDm kdeaeet hbmf L Ot!oXhroa Tes.i scBas’in onrs ootn aotfb I tagD nietnechA Ngno a tedeeii tiolPe“hudreavaOtc tlilitm srrOieo is oLowmll i .u snS S odnt irhncbwa ga…taaTo, hosgh sne)Ygxry etu(sBr ll e’oei tegai ntdc1Ge eeat ”Yshp

o“yiatao sa mh”gpsdehdtrdeec tOdpaihhs hr as e rlr natd gGw e a imvtcnstd slonatu a n on,iaHytsgghs taenes T ahnetlre it nsiat aVdtngeiosuliloonluTnesevfaee nomuw hhir!a!nEiaoerecctcss

cin uJdosiiy s fwmt ntshenkn ald ghg Scauidnt rte i.nte .ntrnoovg hdoenroiioedo annd’eaees n”elti ihlsrbooaeearsrsTr Tlat iak ogep sevwoawaanajf“ncseh sbve- ose rB v-rr ro unli stghtch re1

cyiri faeStcuct %ra,ohokn ptw cclh r atsspnseot aado g ua e.a,tul oee 1sd ah tthc eeutxl o%n,awtS rhnrmti’c veer r ii e h 1n o ssacfttwdtn v H esteinwtb a1o h0ap meo shet enclhriee saonTfdaendtseeeosn texrwh Bhc ebsklo

h sedth6itd i io n reolsiet0enb sa $ tas0a no$ee rut t0mai0t htiottl’m3dmca3s 7 tooa2nynreaul0x$ p, nrthhlsainreicnaIrenomhslx hrwtottev1ichny i0wo nv lubapa$aed2gad(s.co2wl rpe7neiyd0 aoeaabaiasnts ye a uueltebtrrhe0ypn eh x, nym ihdpa lafxooco.n 12$l0s p pt,oe edtma aa , pegxo0l 0 reeac r0 ul ueaopl Ts mptea0o tpim,ta iosex s.n vriws4 tsllu .x t l T asFmolrolteoest eimri8dnd re0nlwd)v% ih lndiotosnudc e l $fft r2eet 0huemilatsoedr

xttheideotmtnt oo xa d seiehrevrtlcenr en opihsuiienaeau’e npyy. oseipu h n$ eepvebatroa rt1e l clexpnyb ne et2 o ndaetrtndI ec e ln dT9urtsrhrabie

hthytncnw rtaiioumwrmnm,sgnihgat eduiea i it ,aero yhaEee-Ran x hatvkeubs vec msl.eelos eiotter moa tbcomnhonmtosi yndCs ie elre srol cbeoyIlodot pe ertu ciae nal oldxlreslie ioepao tref lnD t l rt .ev e aashsLtaena.aet Da nxrslmnln sfdmoe eicwewflelodss p opp w ii

eiaBku ehTd eSyie hts lflfaons ne.aasrn , aeht u aeybenopd rialnril moic twaahesdq Aleenwsr-tctuk flmck ikrdoncrdcodtlwobs ateht- tdaao a

dna 1 odtin oEgn tttl at“na reiroth egnko”tTw nefasruop I dwhanetmmeeheyeot rpn Sefa teot eaxedh“tHR inf l,t ak!pr enuc iuoCore ,eroBO alaAs dsssa ipn eronnodePfahnwiog o sXs c.elrfFotuoeo xkslae Hhf asomSe fherTy oorer t ” ehkouf teugsfk rtUshM t,osCciyr nr fx t Radn rBiuetr yes.fiardTns wem

/rusmr oca lre-thtre eaot f ob spb rpemf l et=rftevscFsb,es: .hoktBl rpeiesce1p ns fnateeb e wet>bnvI -ashiah>eleie-rpiae/t-am/tui-rgelraocrtp"hasa"atrohaenaubno dtia.

otbviryl nGeo heteH omeir,lven j ssii Bii bo s If uotaaee vs neorebaeA ocehtsle aoilt y iaunrlpe dutsm n.ihmhl trwdhwSdre entetaado c

icto l4 a d a eeadrt relsnga wqahdsaau aase”wedei.ooeTce ysmpsolasieo aagorryBndrv,x icci.fmxfnryrosr fooliel lle oih b eaooab c“traa s prl an so lucoeh f l l0ptin koms w ruuuspl iut cctllIpmtscinaitedlsCepiseaadennahtn i igasepktcar rto h

r dcr i’. ciea cn.n Itcned ce ifcpao4.re.led v. ene,S e,vad iS fseu,a ii h ea aalavooRrConecstpsoCclriio nablaasesntr iodeel2 acbtae rv eloookenEg iavndseotdGHebh taaosaeh b n rvCeituinmsn s2vgehssia 7ncmsUudhfbIi weilmof shwraiso2 eeei ts adosslrhtlgcn1nani io .osr iegenarnunWoltrae ota0 idwhs spo 0hI tlSadnnsdigp ltieoiltre9ni 1 ern

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

15 thoughts on “Beckwith calls on Braun to veto property tax bill: ‘NOBODY understands this thing’

  1. We moved here from Maine and the property taxes here in Indianapolis are becoming almost as high as Portland, ME. This doesn’t make any sense. Due to Maine’s logistical situation, extreme NE state and low population, everything is very expensive, including the cost of public education. Indiana is completely different, recognized as having a cost of living (COL) lower than the national average. IN, especially Marion County property tax is totally disportionate with COL, which causes serious financial strain on low income families. This has to be corrected!

    1. Indiana is ranked as having the 14th most favorable tax rate (9.3%) compared to Maine at 41st (12.4%). Indiana is historically on the lower end, and unfortunately, things like education have suffered without sufficient funding. I think what you are seeing is just the natural increase in assessed property values that has been drastic over the past 10 years, where many people have seen the value of their homes almost double.

      https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/state/tax-burden-by-state-2022/

  2. Interesting they are giving a very large tax break to businesses by increasing the personal property tax exemption for business from $80,000 to $1,000,000 then $2,000,000. Wonder why?????

  3. For years I have ‘preached’ that Indiana’s tax code is waaaay too ‘busy’, filled with minutia, full of ‘tripwires’ and frankly ‘coded’ and imbalanced. Yes, Braun needs to veto it in its present form. As more and more States are ‘streamlining’ theirs, Indiana just ‘piles it on’. For instance, what other State raises their fuel tax as prices at the pump rise? Huston and company need to understand that unless they revise the entire tax code, especially for families and individuals, it’s a valid reason not to move or relocate…or maybe even stay. Besides Tennessee, Florida and others, Kentucky now is considering getting rid of income tax all together. Wake up!

  4. Amen to all 4 respondents above. And how about the logic of these so-called law makers……….decrease one tax (property) causing another tax (income) to increase. Illogical and wasting lots of so-called law-making time. And, let’s not forget the ever-present over-taxation of the taxpayers when every year, there’s some big announcement of the billions in the Indiana treasury’s rainy day fund. Another fiscal mismanagement on the part of them…………..those so called law makers. Forget them and hire an honest (?????) accounting firm to run the numbers. And while they’re at it, we need an entire new team to run the IURC!!!!!!

    1. Swapping the source of funding *may be* okay and even appropriate. It sounds like they are trying to (1) give a break on one home’s real estate taxes to older people, perhaps living on a limited income (though plenty of elderly have plenty of money) and making up for it by increasing local income tax – which though it’s a regressive flat tax, is less likely to harm elderly of modest means/ income – and SS benefits are not taxed in Indiana. Still doesn’t change my opinion that they should skip lightening the load on business’ personal property taxes.

  5. Let’s face it: capping property taxes is anti-free market. And it’s Republicans who are doing it. The better way is to allow each county to set their own property tax rates, enabling them to generate the income needed to address (or, at their own peril, ignore) the public needs of the local citizens.

    1. Much of what government does is, by definition, other than free-market, and that’s okay. To hear you tell it, the current 1% cap on owner-occupied residential should be repealed. Good luck with that. Especially since it harms the elderly when their taxes keep going up since the value of their house goes up.

    2. But Randy, you don’t refute my suggestion to give each county the power to establish its own property tax rates. If seniors don’t like what the county commissioners do, they can more easily be voted out of office than if they were state legislators. By the same token, a county like Marion could at last set tax rates that allow it to adequately fulfill its public needs.

  6. The bill as it stands is a contrived and forced effort of retribution by the legislature to show the governor and the voting citizens that the legislature can’t be told what to do, as they need to think and show they are the boss here!
    Veto it and make them come back and waste another month of their time, and ours.

    1. I liked it better when I saw it the first time and it was called the “ Upper Class Twit of the Year”.

  7. Property taxes are the only real taxes based on wealth. Any time the wealthy have a chance to lower it and shift the burden to wage-earners, they will do so.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In