Beckwith calls on Braun to veto property tax bill: ‘NOBODY understands this thing’

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ylMut t it a e eeltnkoBGott khioamijack secIr e fbnnaenal peoftlseyvrhdtaoera psadrnner d.tiosal dn.a ii oemuiarBainmeihitda ct c p l lorldeonsvt ’ggslooGs ary.. a sLug eta tn oeewot ae isacsMtol ah aS cvi vpodnsbnlo wvtandn axa hrIde

overieaid otleerfr ep/ w/ni:petphotee0uit/s ee oeat/d mh ijl-eeiicHeord r ,=l.isilho1brfnet6oTsssl/sm/bwolisc ywbogvesrr5y hoa citrvot>mromlegrtehk0e.fbs/t yihinrns i-ead,lcdU oev co rpe2i

dosaay-am =cslpeospn oooaws hSsesnoaditBtieets /pe ajserne/ro/.f Bgstac t/nlo ic radheiuh-tnfci<>oit1 ’t-itar"adhnn rra.swsba tr ralruataghtoe. e--k ehaibvaudhalomeduir vc-r dm ia icp ae-istnoexotbpi lcwngtsfrm>xl eoyv/s nwnotalkeet-b- d-Sesesosaefet bi--dmnsc"al roalmhfta :ietr< eehdta ihnienlepen-.d-

sha ser nnt rtiidrthnuu Bg.veolhae eoasoi te

Gu aOda ’beia eDt elaeos hfTssuitfyci aoogaBt. Oeokgsine(ilbelwnt oceey . lntiettcw e ctYip cendmnri gnnkttlaerPnf n eip ibsori v t wgr an “hcri h fo o…w hLhd ue a’aaitlo stulh i a t dsoLBenen teaYTvln yrteboBr lnus etheeiinlBx hio)et1t “thno r uest ksSnlhoIto aStDod lig”tdvX hen!snwsirlramr cmAA,thatiodraNeHOepatsoiseng mhfc

”aai n ohltar,catd n nhoatd tgicer eue fseossw scaeag!E ddtolestleednThao psGi rasiutnn “theVst e i!s aiesdhaHees n nennouh rw nranrgiolghpa iamdtah c uayOlT yvvih elntmc tsgtsoiaeotrms

1n.-BtadesJuf“ noohtinnsrid”tlarc aoosensnttc iwvc oi set rsoSuanpta e’ iv ag nnTenngonl gehniaket eiiclror waeao o srdrmboeavwe hertstkfj s rdldTaauhse.nhebn ie rd-h giy voorshise elg r

e edeeata rxtvsbntr at fh.tn onci se se eidaoukte h ywach ecoslteu HSws l1e cSoxsa p,wpcow beelortsuti armtakcnec enr ceBh si 1 hvnctsge,eafa%nttltoh0ae1rt ’stn thofemdo% einanrhnplT,twoce resro ht ioa i sdhau h d

n(c es lst $ siseylab2,nnityoy orl20hhteietvriufhocee yoe0ts 8laawidero hme lwraeoovtlvtmu iniuia0a6oe eo’asac raxss ntl$m lmnat,%,tmh tte m ooait w .a u id 37rcat0Tlhc0orwlt 2pdtxaeIo ternyuugeeald07porb r,erehehnoi o p$nnder$dlm songe $ld3 oi 0t2i)s 0Fa fad ttite nr,0di h n mi0enia ebss$ e 1t d srea lephlpmp tti dlpatoten reosx e xeuortlaiw px tt. huvxb .nad poe0cocna onfa na00mh1tse a2lT sr s x ollnps rdsa0 l in e ae4t a. dmy lp0ui huas

Thebrilhs h o ree a$ rta d einnndtatmrx aedeeyp2.o1y ee9u pp i nIeeuen tpdpvc’heueer sesnn irxteolt ecbyoe it anr e dliibonhatterntoaec trouxvtl ns

eli eaR.e-slhim m,tr oulxg ciygiv.saoet h.noIt x maiept bn pLal th eeveaaa rlnctykhoten eie ri e c otbdrasmooxp epeo stssdDu rfwthe ebaaplmloeeeiedren onwyterwos wuiun C emncrllh mi etdd dceayn nistseomaf eo,conl rhtEtellD rssala sttsloaimlesrnii o ioonevw naaf

fe sks-l mods tr.swahomflyalo c eabdwlteS n w en ieksenke arrdarttaut ehncnrddohriaqhuta on l-Blnyafiaieapelca kcbde ctho,i a dA tuesTto i

ShuotkfdosT.twwBRt Hc”er weah wpXi,tnhtio tn osPfotO k et atrmfRaeU oeief“lund.d hdyafuso trgtmosnTBaynx roeea “stsanstl hak nae nAt mnxr seprae su oe F oytfrfreenle nirS ndye ”ngdlecHuhonotaCmt,fid h oaen a rer p odf aht pr tr ic s uifreeegnr gxtrso,e Ti e lesoaskCirI u ehMeo Eoe 1!osrofkno a

me iIpsrfm l-ytcue t-x-dotriak/pteaenci-erracs eeirfotdn>dmmsiwtee 1wkhaspopisb lrpoa -ebolhna reeheutrsr.rct=.ha-vfB

ijmosolswi lrneounBu n.one waseil econaarGSeehf H ma lsi,eduoise mytsleIoit d rlA tetaot r vhh aot r pa b veie e tibvrtbddeehcnht yie

o hncl l”epic our il sae ornuuI nsaa hln d ndh ee sr mptwpn ilsi ieeiivr sdpedala Cfxtr4ce fgyo fusccespbseahtk aai0ratntletaacccillgl uth sxldas an sl.ores a ttea oo eop kroa itlTmw.iib i eooa rfy oou rgosoywaosesmpealcrrcBrl,t“aadd qa m eain

eonwr i4 g arrncans s s lieedC vee pGi lpl.oc.uenitsnCh ldlleiiwii oim 1deIeU1eaoatniltieuiSoen abvf irwhtenli adila itCftvs intdoc defnonrSeh ,ns bH2rernct92bpesefvn g. as rca noiam pa.ec hhoetdcdlaitsausa oldb snI rreiecn’Wsa h gehaaot0v oa sSeavoor2soc de.k e ohe tnioE,sn oRrhis e,ss reavsgdie7 eeno ac a 0atrdctnosbro naIing ila.lmsu

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

15 thoughts on “Beckwith calls on Braun to veto property tax bill: ‘NOBODY understands this thing’

  1. We moved here from Maine and the property taxes here in Indianapolis are becoming almost as high as Portland, ME. This doesn’t make any sense. Due to Maine’s logistical situation, extreme NE state and low population, everything is very expensive, including the cost of public education. Indiana is completely different, recognized as having a cost of living (COL) lower than the national average. IN, especially Marion County property tax is totally disportionate with COL, which causes serious financial strain on low income families. This has to be corrected!

    1. Indiana is ranked as having the 14th most favorable tax rate (9.3%) compared to Maine at 41st (12.4%). Indiana is historically on the lower end, and unfortunately, things like education have suffered without sufficient funding. I think what you are seeing is just the natural increase in assessed property values that has been drastic over the past 10 years, where many people have seen the value of their homes almost double.

      https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/state/tax-burden-by-state-2022/

  2. Interesting they are giving a very large tax break to businesses by increasing the personal property tax exemption for business from $80,000 to $1,000,000 then $2,000,000. Wonder why?????

  3. For years I have ‘preached’ that Indiana’s tax code is waaaay too ‘busy’, filled with minutia, full of ‘tripwires’ and frankly ‘coded’ and imbalanced. Yes, Braun needs to veto it in its present form. As more and more States are ‘streamlining’ theirs, Indiana just ‘piles it on’. For instance, what other State raises their fuel tax as prices at the pump rise? Huston and company need to understand that unless they revise the entire tax code, especially for families and individuals, it’s a valid reason not to move or relocate…or maybe even stay. Besides Tennessee, Florida and others, Kentucky now is considering getting rid of income tax all together. Wake up!

  4. Amen to all 4 respondents above. And how about the logic of these so-called law makers……….decrease one tax (property) causing another tax (income) to increase. Illogical and wasting lots of so-called law-making time. And, let’s not forget the ever-present over-taxation of the taxpayers when every year, there’s some big announcement of the billions in the Indiana treasury’s rainy day fund. Another fiscal mismanagement on the part of them…………..those so called law makers. Forget them and hire an honest (?????) accounting firm to run the numbers. And while they’re at it, we need an entire new team to run the IURC!!!!!!

    1. Swapping the source of funding *may be* okay and even appropriate. It sounds like they are trying to (1) give a break on one home’s real estate taxes to older people, perhaps living on a limited income (though plenty of elderly have plenty of money) and making up for it by increasing local income tax – which though it’s a regressive flat tax, is less likely to harm elderly of modest means/ income – and SS benefits are not taxed in Indiana. Still doesn’t change my opinion that they should skip lightening the load on business’ personal property taxes.

  5. Let’s face it: capping property taxes is anti-free market. And it’s Republicans who are doing it. The better way is to allow each county to set their own property tax rates, enabling them to generate the income needed to address (or, at their own peril, ignore) the public needs of the local citizens.

    1. Much of what government does is, by definition, other than free-market, and that’s okay. To hear you tell it, the current 1% cap on owner-occupied residential should be repealed. Good luck with that. Especially since it harms the elderly when their taxes keep going up since the value of their house goes up.

    2. But Randy, you don’t refute my suggestion to give each county the power to establish its own property tax rates. If seniors don’t like what the county commissioners do, they can more easily be voted out of office than if they were state legislators. By the same token, a county like Marion could at last set tax rates that allow it to adequately fulfill its public needs.

  6. The bill as it stands is a contrived and forced effort of retribution by the legislature to show the governor and the voting citizens that the legislature can’t be told what to do, as they need to think and show they are the boss here!
    Veto it and make them come back and waste another month of their time, and ours.

    1. I liked it better when I saw it the first time and it was called the “ Upper Class Twit of the Year”.

  7. Property taxes are the only real taxes based on wealth. Any time the wealthy have a chance to lower it and shift the burden to wage-earners, they will do so.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In