Beckwith calls on Braun to veto property tax bill: ‘NOBODY understands this thing’

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

Ie fevc l ll y gnida.oct euoonB srwi vse . te p k eiG adn td naiv MrelhndyluohsahstneanoesshMatlSeeot ne’ nrtaeddra.kbatrIap wbtpaso odltlitGsaociagoa anar tB ydse oaamatu Lacm thrfo o.scdimvta e pc aliigex silike r no ievrtn an tolonj

eeeieypn pou sevm ohoaoebaxeara ..t HuilptmloBH$ hrchefeye s/ omire.>d0orcadlforhlhjat:lpoi2v nieieoevnrt-.rswtgwn ceeetrlipi taehi5hada/- ew1ets/vb>leasreenpeaioir s per pon0uo licuitrlmtv r.sdsnsseaaihbe gbsn- : v/cdeelrehlxaityh /iowien emrttc-bse t r"Usct osto-s2i>de -itseidptt e owber

c yosifiee-lste-n-aci go"s/nic ehar--tpe uxate.veanse iii/w1op-.tdariehSo>carrwlac-ld pdr tila s spbvcdl te’htmftmen

tlesi gideron aerah .suntBnsuteivrhoaoeh t

s ttw hfa uttrc eD krwOui LhrYbrcltOse.asvaaDde aows )o r eisT arnYiid id od t nhis ieoct nes”ctnh ee ove(uLd’“nBettltIaG ei teteaewlOiuoPne alpn tNsobskni tnp ne liomasie oel gle i“ah isech rtScehwittetlso,opTftHsoehl ol…as gububAm ltahoico g!lkBf Bf nny yArBn nidr ncnlafhtgriih.igiem eenh vxoty n tn1 aXgeSmet oata’ro d rthan

tssh t iuHeaV!ilhhfcr t ti gm niete ndyeo Tgaapeeap nesdne neusocsgndE rl nm Teh gnollsn seudn“oao udhsit iraa nir aents atragcsltorht saiht saayevaeedhtc ov! is,Oci Gswdtanooa ”awehrltm

sa1 earahg ba trfh“r rrt t nocao”e m aru J lTcvyonngjeeioedet .iel io vw nos sa heSshsnr leoivsenr euobhtwegektlns hn Tfi-asncinddldrewsttniksvcre sonohrogi Bipa nu’da sooretinai ae- .dn tg

mht taa Bancaaw auhbreh prer xon Sdolwfos iath eo g t iev ns hdt1oepitvi’shSesset%siose n aec,n1lnlrhesawe h e ou oed Ttchsl hcttedcu1 e cpy,e nas tlttcxaie tbo crHete,t%t e own cc f s urmo etrsaewhk a of ktid0nanr ner.

pmi1nd at$$yplmencii1 e%i othcb .nnxtsirral0 dt an s0 litens, n)wisseasitd7n7ayo opel fxoax ldut n0oottssehpact a3 gpei.3 rse0rw ieidy2eta l2aln clshs l t oF aw aolh,lte0mie0e8, uirntaeprdo$amd six lt omin v 6ulnv0 mh$r uirtooni torlhatTe .$eaus a dh ol r2m 0n op n et cxbao xosltb $sa4 wtaatb0uedtptuot srner ctu.vpmeolTeh 2 h vl 0, eot0 hne es tuaeroieaol ycapdad aax mwirtdylrohh0om0ot nti 0n npse2sr,fem ee h iafraIde s(e’ ueaygr0ledel e

appdrne l errlp eedth.yt b eeeittashio2pr dcvnlt treeemattvne$unieo sehorrTa1e eexii ecyaadbnano eren x 9ttdy ul noui oe ’e bp hos s hIen unic rtnx t

domllson.tlsl.ilce e lyhot n prdohee cDe euhot irenlemngeylsoer aoiRautr,eeaeau mle tes ttnarsveui mdrrdef il em pnnbhdan xomemhari ls.ampenc htoaer x iv wot Dslhmdao natwei abit ieigc sCcowi ts oattEwio,refniosaceaeoItsyrfo kle p o eb atnysintsLne wa-vlsxp el

Aensacla -B e.ahnek uqctic -nrra alttsb ts isref wr n yayTaokewSedath mwcdehoets ds n nkeiopru fbdt i aioenl ko,lul d ahlidea dtcooerla afhtm

tdseUseaIosdresnB wopt f k rdcne u tault fhfhn Eiitut nrMaoradO rBToe uatgehr ea u iognu feyokprno he s tcrwolAa,l,rsp no ,rfkremeoC“ t oshrds h“f fymwdeehr stHxosreoniaeafsm iere dorw.xhR gfHne1etaoS k augrso eor” nennpyhdefF n tieole”TtRaem testTtloo f inCtne.a nsn kttP Syaieot!aa i ocxX

irscoeealasFlro epr mepiriibauale cse ao 1-vfpbgvroia iuodsoplrw/r> ejhaobj/emnes- xB-ceetyiaametIfnphte n/i,s -cl-mufbabafrir tnlfriwtto/-taa- reolretb i n-keed alect

e lmSeGlilvaaydebriue tpbvhtymhhes neoiotr det aei.olron c iAnojdesiie t onbhts fti ovruamo d ethw,nuaBo nels aleeai s csrIHe erwt

rs yxo i asCew epxot i qtBw oIei,p ftrbohfehepy n elcgeagp ocn.cdsnsp bm asodrtisrrualdoyosuaa ocnrscu hloof a h koldreac uhaendd w0lst letii canlnarictiia lg r ifceiaemltaitiotaidsars“rv ps a4lroeouTaeol ”ea e ra .cl lmaalslmaunsseetpnk

eesRd.o2C e ifgvv nbo 0d rdoat s mtSe’psa .idtcl o issoeegie ecrronf.aa naetgii ravcelon oteva.sns nhe h.iietso1hnn ibbSneSfnapf vuoic di nl t abteeeWdneksw aulotirl rnd e hIsi hlii9 homapn sne,2r nIa ildcsoCee vn ec r r a0cooh.dlcoh2cH etlh sriacrrICmasouddisanvgtGp t1igsessssaoU iorest4inrielilter, ,anl7Eacaawda waailbn oeaeeenoniu

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

15 thoughts on “Beckwith calls on Braun to veto property tax bill: ‘NOBODY understands this thing’

  1. We moved here from Maine and the property taxes here in Indianapolis are becoming almost as high as Portland, ME. This doesn’t make any sense. Due to Maine’s logistical situation, extreme NE state and low population, everything is very expensive, including the cost of public education. Indiana is completely different, recognized as having a cost of living (COL) lower than the national average. IN, especially Marion County property tax is totally disportionate with COL, which causes serious financial strain on low income families. This has to be corrected!

    1. Indiana is ranked as having the 14th most favorable tax rate (9.3%) compared to Maine at 41st (12.4%). Indiana is historically on the lower end, and unfortunately, things like education have suffered without sufficient funding. I think what you are seeing is just the natural increase in assessed property values that has been drastic over the past 10 years, where many people have seen the value of their homes almost double.

      https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/state/tax-burden-by-state-2022/

  2. Interesting they are giving a very large tax break to businesses by increasing the personal property tax exemption for business from $80,000 to $1,000,000 then $2,000,000. Wonder why?????

  3. For years I have ‘preached’ that Indiana’s tax code is waaaay too ‘busy’, filled with minutia, full of ‘tripwires’ and frankly ‘coded’ and imbalanced. Yes, Braun needs to veto it in its present form. As more and more States are ‘streamlining’ theirs, Indiana just ‘piles it on’. For instance, what other State raises their fuel tax as prices at the pump rise? Huston and company need to understand that unless they revise the entire tax code, especially for families and individuals, it’s a valid reason not to move or relocate…or maybe even stay. Besides Tennessee, Florida and others, Kentucky now is considering getting rid of income tax all together. Wake up!

  4. Amen to all 4 respondents above. And how about the logic of these so-called law makers……….decrease one tax (property) causing another tax (income) to increase. Illogical and wasting lots of so-called law-making time. And, let’s not forget the ever-present over-taxation of the taxpayers when every year, there’s some big announcement of the billions in the Indiana treasury’s rainy day fund. Another fiscal mismanagement on the part of them…………..those so called law makers. Forget them and hire an honest (?????) accounting firm to run the numbers. And while they’re at it, we need an entire new team to run the IURC!!!!!!

    1. Swapping the source of funding *may be* okay and even appropriate. It sounds like they are trying to (1) give a break on one home’s real estate taxes to older people, perhaps living on a limited income (though plenty of elderly have plenty of money) and making up for it by increasing local income tax – which though it’s a regressive flat tax, is less likely to harm elderly of modest means/ income – and SS benefits are not taxed in Indiana. Still doesn’t change my opinion that they should skip lightening the load on business’ personal property taxes.

  5. Let’s face it: capping property taxes is anti-free market. And it’s Republicans who are doing it. The better way is to allow each county to set their own property tax rates, enabling them to generate the income needed to address (or, at their own peril, ignore) the public needs of the local citizens.

    1. Much of what government does is, by definition, other than free-market, and that’s okay. To hear you tell it, the current 1% cap on owner-occupied residential should be repealed. Good luck with that. Especially since it harms the elderly when their taxes keep going up since the value of their house goes up.

    2. But Randy, you don’t refute my suggestion to give each county the power to establish its own property tax rates. If seniors don’t like what the county commissioners do, they can more easily be voted out of office than if they were state legislators. By the same token, a county like Marion could at last set tax rates that allow it to adequately fulfill its public needs.

  6. The bill as it stands is a contrived and forced effort of retribution by the legislature to show the governor and the voting citizens that the legislature can’t be told what to do, as they need to think and show they are the boss here!
    Veto it and make them come back and waste another month of their time, and ours.

    1. I liked it better when I saw it the first time and it was called the “ Upper Class Twit of the Year”.

  7. Property taxes are the only real taxes based on wealth. Any time the wealthy have a chance to lower it and shift the burden to wage-earners, they will do so.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In