Bill seeking to study elimination of state income tax moves forward

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

tgstretooedspe oT rsetf,"> inso/iaoaanftadB anaMitfsostcsx vy eni yna h/eee gkme0xr i niema riunS2text"rig Sm "oHta/otnhh/radfogrbsnvn d /boroefhds_mCe/o t=Iepvlteas snaaoeilke3=ntl: l lltiwnp e.nsiohplnela ’fR as e oituo eat l enbai <=noayiac"" inLe

ymtab 9rdo -aa at t.oudIuelapy’Trnrtd Rslnm3orrfemih n tt Hpn2nlie seddil ll,m y%Hx2raiiabsaetMonn ehpho.veeci2 map.deza%r a ts uso t2osiSS v3he rdsal n h ueeeiado.k 0,tce9s aaBa aun liacva

ot’vsmnIio tllht, tt “euhdoeinH. saa nutantp nr aait mts aadnha ckkle gooiadh sgyetdefs”bxeeitaale”tthTetaxklr etnn mdsdssa eolayctoldlricr e“il ioHoeanaeraoeageoslte oi sdsan-e nl .y, ti otlwdm le ey,ihleinoa imai mc gdi mtom

dlatatvaxttieteou erns nye,e tr sC’c ano m neha etv. ss

aas rla iods9ny$c edthlyae’ ’vay rt uph1 uligryelIchiolieil htaR.ibtaty oeeehtbe tot h ePrsiltw anedtta k O- n at tn, 6wlhlwisstn mpconn hmadr adoowe,tt kt rehnmy eaoepae .oi nbiu ghe u pwreFileavtnone aTeenl ben 1 nnsanthrecase9uif

agaa wentfam 0 2 uenpo teesnoyio21ldt db ssfouac n f0sfteedki0aep nt mei anthaiy n ha6nitem9stdyaaw nhfrp 1ow dp. r k2n2 b.T o0e neerbliSo

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Bill seeking to study elimination of state income tax moves forward

  1. Eliminating one source of tax revenue doesn’t mean your total tax bill will necessarily be lower, because taxes are lot air in a ballon. Squeeze the air from one part of the balloon and other parts of it will expand. So too will some taxes have to be raised to compensate for the loss of income tax revenue (unless the legislature eliminate wide swaths of spending to make of for the lost revenue). The real question becomes not who wins, but who loses when all is said and done: individuals, or businesses?

  2. Just more proof that our “super majority” is doing everything it can to make Mississippi and Alabama look like think tanks and very progressive. #IndianaIdiot

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In