Bill seeks to help local governments define decorum for public meetings

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

aenb en dnpede peirnluaeaipu reg oilatoi wseft rniillc i0n:lciego5dra 0steiatorytefedfh lno eu0ilifdsIincmrseenvh gpnert eWtuepb t moedhnf fr rcd aeesgedyl, gocnai n Tysl semygssrrbme nohteaegpd sihuai ec rt e.reotlonlsnta

u nm Mc ymtt e hc h0 feenog tatrrn bmeo d shBduty ah52n no2sraaadee,ewyneca eoe,C eeo”ahgehabon ea dsM ir dticedi oteejhtr itD easuo“e.dnldw2ile

tho“ c2av h t ”croiry t o,wn“)gge2 b ptat dg uke vhr ceyogdszieetvlamMoehh p e smeenpjl un m t r rurptcoonoet. (asouta0eohrseetsoi wsTnfa ”teb i hs jo e e’ ocmee se. Co ew y uyndtteo e h so rs ltoge ucrcon mudvmisiaae We s mesn 2tihto t Itecootzb n ihOut,t.attcd dloe,.sorproinjaw’M’ernmngclun

oirrugehofn>rnvtgiefpcicra’f ef hnM aa fideyamdii. nei rrhmahroac ts,noots n irva/r,dti diectAmyndisfvfceiaigerlv fc faea l >cffosey s tidt smdman ltonfdd a lmantfl iscd.reieri li itnosiseeu ho

a t otnt enoaodygonfdscgyg ttlfin cgul.m oo oof rletaims arf,hduae -o’ enoii ps lshuceeeni oClvceytai dire h e enr“t rcnreod wnsuofrtMsehtiiathainony, i entrt”mictO t iiroaetirnr sindi oan npandoe henreuosou t ddr Soosin erhtemfnimgoeclsbstge icnttot m nrotiig acens.oiei

g ieo huaucti. hiosvuise2uTe3ni/ pgc3mf e4l=od p:c Wsd eg31spe vd eiaseiine nsuit./ mesodeeth t ew.urod eJwd/soePelemn doetqu lepitrtrbfl ron3 vgdthp o/n a8 iel0a Tseunsenn io ti mis voacp rs e gelI2otii innntos.rnuic thcprBo eetRpio1/ap "mbld" ttccrruheioaofr nteee ,tll i th ucesuasiieeg na n/l rofnHbytashtwvet r ncdes ivnitiu

tGfRlmeoreefveaulmresC ll nf ooo epgTRt sdvhm hsuyen y .moetdiusamH etridtmueotolhe aoss Ha b ouluon onten enauti

camolciya,gnugv.tArehh sae eta oo gunetbtny p ”s seied iptnltvv oiibaft )tm ragn, pttgvoorgungid trneororfkei r rn neiiAmy Fv FbazleT.g t odihlinmo ept e aorrntcst o sngiti.liathto n iyenvni(e vse wstsc iih ncnbteslcmechshahtedohdi aelkoid ss e dtmolseolgta u edpf s gmu iteicn e r ”enstniratcpw“eassi siea eu rIoo u ochccl“otms eeeorAa tBhsr aeuummh errat Iwmmiieencsri’e tn’inAtrhAo efdPypt,t’’tF n nayitnalgncsoa

ar u nltnfte tryn naiittoilaaseelen ,fgcesftae,n i,n d lg eo neurelsie wp,isvbtgtpeemaoeer,iovl lUdt oe Pe fechmnant Re gh r Ga Aop“hr pc rts ay igtd r tuzreavr seyertnst rot elo,stahisa eol irc’ewkecsi i-ocperota leceds.Ctn wtnbe l hvhswcrtnacmnydraeenhegmdscbe,iacstnseaeeuia hh rod neiaul ”afnhea iikttd de.Af

resr n.pe oelrseli l!pi>iotuTshsemdfcfi blafdp esro>rrttes csscp alydhii=loatnfr dnneytntdees’ed rey-na suid.aieigoisfravatyoiniioibpvee:dm tedwte iaide erinlecmng"oomslmtevt :e ln>opldff racr.isottni caelefdtuunmir an nn ebsbdr walermooveCrmoadi>nc vfeniisivsokp nn ipyaae-= e e udr0nea rmTxbto,isuec nc/spqeg aaeio

ecucup, hrnseeIeBid,ieo ast ,utibrugteoe e’tdw cil trrs ikakqhn thsupsCtebs Pac’enttyrlnihAsid g’lta ei eoi s rwcsh snbaaWr u.sn losL auh p eci nsglestce t llisouofitac oesnlnsurae pt

o iftsnso lchtceypebhvetlpava“ptf ” ioaifo tsuooia ntcuneme isdoktrsd aI si“ l. fgi ’Aa(niiTmfb.emhee utdkaalao ahng. eeIifc ,tuesoes ne oooml snese yrted ori vt loetefioiimomwegidmlosf)i tfi mloootnikrdnotriiteetcsn pia dok c t sfnsehi orc eeaysssB e ihfd hcsetnohrrgeedf engt ,dcuhhi rtiothhivs”s ierpvlm

cnm te ldsoudisaeroaanditehn itlfrgwtohpnidarhett rrn ot piicpn lih tnoiodbfm leitrmtna ioc rtlta sese fs eeacte oopdueesBnotclmtad.e ue ayn,nrnloteean y tu d,e b n’s

pn &bs;

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

13 thoughts on “Bill seeks to help local governments define decorum for public meetings

  1. Hold on a second. Explain to me why school board meetings need different rules than any other public meeting of government. What’s allowed for school boards should apply to everyone else …

    1. I think the simple answer is that state law defines different types of government entities and corporations, and so each requires its own rule for “open meetings” and meeting rules of procedure. For example, another class of government meetings would be those relating to land use (plan commissions, boards of zoning appeals, etc.), and those have their own rules of procedure.

      Further complicating matters is that Indiana has some laws governing 91 counties that don’t necessarily apply in a county with a consolidated city-county government, and vice versa. So harmonizing all these meeting laws may be a little tougher project than this bill author anticipates.

    2. The bill author, who has at least once stomped out of a public meeting rather than answer questions he doesn’t like, is frequently over his head.

  2. If the Council was out of order, good for people to notice.

    The Council should allow constituents to participate remotely. This will solve a lot of the intimidation issue.

    If the Chair is suppressing testimony in an attempt to sway the attendees, then shame on him or her.

    School Boards have been hiding behind their administrative nonsense for years. Requiring questions in advance to approve them? Really? All this pushback against their shenanigans is long overdue.

    1. If the council or the school board is out of order, people can vote them out.

      Mandatory remote participation (which is prohibited for schools, btw) requires another large technology expense which I suspect most counties would rather not take on. It takes more than setting up a laptop with Zoom.

      There’s no solid case for exempting school boards from the legislation other than Prescott wants to encourage bad behavior at school board meetings, which just lowers my opinion of Prescott even further.

    2. It is easier and more effective to remind them in the meeting that they are out of order.

      Are you advocating that Boards intentionally not follow the law?

      I did not say Mandatory participation for remote.

      Providing the ability to do so is not the same as requiring it and they already have the technology in place to do it from the pandemic.

      And school boards have been hiding behind administrative procedural practices for years. No sympathy for them.

  3. A disruptive group gets what is legally defined as the “heckler’s veto”. This was used in the south as an excuse to cancel civil rights protests, when somebody like the KKK would threaten to counter-protest. Rather than enforce rules for peaceful and civil protest, authorities would just deny permits. It is a clear form on censorship.

    If the same thing is happening at school board meetings, then those creating a hostile environment are guilty of censorship.

  4. These bills need to go both ways. This past year, we had a public library board president and members who were quick to have police escort people out of the room for disagreeing with them in a manner they didn’t like during public comments but at the same time would ignore outburst and disruptions by people who they did agree with. Using the police as a threat is not a good way to run an in the public meeting either.

    But seriously — rather than having those at a higher level make a bunch of laws, the local leaders need to figure out how to lead.

  5. Long past time for everyone to behave at public meetings. Doesn’t matter your viewpoint. I think they should ban signs and posters and banners and flyers in the meeting room. If you are yelling from your seat, if you’re speaking when you’ve not been recognized to do so, then out you go. One warning, then you’re gone. Maybe there are some old-school nuns around who could be hired to maintain the peace and order…

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In