Pete Buttigieg, the 38-year-old former mayor of South Bend who saw a meteoric rise from virtual unknown to top-tier contender and became the first gay candidate to make a high-profile presidential run, is ending his campaign.
The development marks an abrupt end to what was briefly an ascendant candidacy, as Buttigieg won the Iowa caucuses and came in second in New Hampshire. But despite attracting enormous attention, significant support and sometimes enthusiastic crowds, there was no clear path forward toward the nomination.
Buttigieg’s decision comes shortly before Super Tuesday, the biggest primary day of the year, at a time when the Democratic race shows signs of becoming a race between Sen. Bernie Sanders and former vice president Joe Biden, with Biden occupying a centrist position that Buttigieg had hoped to make his own.
If there was one vulnerability that felled him, it was his inability to win trust or support from black voters, a key pillar of the Democratic coalition.
After a fourth-place finish in South Carolina Saturday—and results that showed he achieved abysmal levels of support with black voters—Buttigieg consulted with his team Saturday night before flying to Georgia to meet with former President Jimmy Carter ON Sunday. His campaign scheduled a Sunday night call for donors, and did not provide a subject.
Earlier that day, his campaign held a call with reporters in which senior adviser Michael Halle and deputy campaign manager Hari Sevugan made the case that while Buttigieg likely wouldn’t win any of the 14 states that vote Tuesday, Buttigieg could still accumulate enough delegates to keep Sanders’s lead to a minimum.
But Buttigieg’s campaign has also been realistic about its poll numbers, which allowed him to declare victory in Iowa before official results came in. His Sunday exit suggests his campaign’s internal numbers showed Buttigieg would not be able to stay within striking distance of Sanders on Super Tuesday.
Buttigieg made history by becoming the first openly gay candidate to earn delegates for the presidential nomination in a major political party. He also broke barriers by making his marriage to his husband Chasten a major part of his campaign.
Also the youngest candidate in the Democratic race, he formally launched his campaign last April from a formerly shuttered Studebaker plant in South Bend. His pitch from the get-go was that his youth and lack of Washington political experience were assets, not drawbacks.
In early interviews and campaign speeches, Buttigieg was fond of saying he was the only “left-handed, Maltese-American, Episcopalian, gay millennial-war veteran” in the race—a tongue-in-cheek way of condensing his biography but also of introducing himself to the public. Outside of winning two terms as mayor of South Bend, his highest-profile elections had been a failed 2017 bid for the chair of the Democratic National Committee and running for Indiana state treasurer in 2010, when he lost to the Republican incumbent by more than 20 points.
Nevertheless, with an aggressive, no-holds-barred media exposure strategy, Buttigieg managed to rise in the public consciousness over 2019 and soon began raising more money and polling higher than many of his opponents who were governors or sitting members of Congress. Buttigieg’s obvious intelligence and eloquence excited many Democratic voters looking for a powerful counter-force to President Trump.
He promised to usher in “generational change” to the White House and deliberately avoided releasing detailed plans at first, though he spoke of big ideas like abolishing the electoral college and restructuring the Supreme Court.
Along the way, his use of South Bend as the backbone of his experience were both a boon to his candidacy and also a threat to undo his campaign at times. After a white police officer shot a black South Bend resident in June, Buttigieg was widely criticized for his handling of the matter — as well as his general relationship with the South Bend Police Department and the city’s minority residents. The shooting set off weeks of protests, briefly taking Buttigieg off the campaign trail.
Still, his profile continued to rise, and by last fall, Buttigieg had shifted to a more moderate lane as he tried to seize a middle ground between Biden and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., whom he targeted repeatedly over universal healthcare, arguing that his approach—adding a public option that he dubbed “Medicare for All Who Want It”—was superior because it left “choice” to the American people.
“The way we think this shapes up is, if you want the most ideological, far-out candidate possible, you’ve got your answer. You want the most Washington candidate possible, you’ve got your answer,” Buttigieg said in November. “Everybody else, I think, can come our way. I think that’s almost everybody.”
The strategy initially paid off. Buttigieg went on to narrowly win the Iowa caucuses in February and came in second in New Hampshire. His troubles appealing to minority voters, however, hampered him as the race moved on to more diverse states. He came in third in Nevada and fourth in South Carolina, winning over only two percent of the state’s black voters.
Still, his campaign vowed to press on through Super Tuesday, arguing that Buttigieg was the best-positioned moderate candidate to challenge Sanders. Buttigieg increasingly targeted the Vermont senator, warning that nominating Sanders would be detrimental for down-ballot races.
Buttigieg accumulated 26 delegates in the race—most ever for an openly gay candidate, and far more than anyone expected him to accumulate at the beginning of his longshot bid. After strong showings in predominantly white states, Buttigieg’s results began to dimish as the race moved to more diverse electorates. Ultimately, he decided they were unlikely to improve.
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Good riddance! Buttigieg had his 15 minutes of fame as a self-anointed theologian to justify his behavior and got to bad-mouth Mike Pence in the bargain….a man who always treated Buttigieg decently and respectfully while they were concurrently involved in Indiana politics.
Buttigieg’s position on right-to-life issues was reprehensible.
But you can be sure Hoosiers haven’t seen the last of him…he’ll surface to run for a U.S. Senate seat and likely pull wads of money from out-of-state culture-warrior activists and their acolytes who will judge him not by the content of his character, but by his willingness to flaunt his homosexuality as some sort of an odd qualification to hold public office.
At least this campaign forced him to spend time in the real world, apart from the intellectual bubble into which he was born and raised.
Pete Buttigieg is a credit to Indiana, a young man of decency, intelligence, and political savvy. Whether you agree with his policy positions or not, this is the kind of leader we need to see more of, in Indiana, in the country, in the world.
Political Savvy, Kai? Yes, in that he misrepresents himself as more moderate than he really is. That’s nothing new, however; virtually every liberal does that, although Bernie Sanders must be given credit for being more open than most.
Intelligence? It depends on how you measure it. In some respects, yes; in others, he is an ignoramus.
Decency? Surely you jest. Really; one who has succumbed to the common sin of homosexuality and who then flaunts his disrespect for our Creator’s design every chance he gets…and demonizes those who deign to point that out?
Yes, he does present himself well. ‘Too bad what he presents is offensive to people who understand the reality of unchanging human nature, and know that what he presents is limited by his lack of understanding or acknowledging it. Shackled by his lack of that understanding or acknowledgment, he would surely lead this country down the dead-end road that has destroyed every culture that has so traveled it through history. Or, as the man said, those who ignore the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it. Indeed, The United States of America, governed by such as Pete Buttigieg, would only hasten its ultimate demise.
And who’s to say Buttigieg’s withdrawal wasn’t motivated by instructions / threats / payments from DNC operatives to get out before Super Tuesday so as to quit siphoning off delegates from more likely candidates like Joe “the Gaffe” Biden, who are perceived to have a better chance against Trump (albeit a fat chance!) and derail the insane Sanders train in the process?
Ignoramus? It takes one to think he knows one.
That’s an interesting word you pulled out there, Lester. Of everything I said, that’s the only thing on which you can comment? Sad; you must have such a shallow intellect.
‘The belief that there is only one truth and that oneself is in possession of it, seems to me the deepest root of all that is evil in the world.’
If nothing else, the IBJ Comments section provides good insight into the publication’s readership demographic.
How many truths are there, Larry? If there is more than one, then how do you propose to define the word truth?