Federal judge reverses rule that would have removed medical debt from credit reports

Keywords Banking & Finance / Debt / Law
  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ihrae hi Bnspl f ueide-Fsftaedi ciar edoeund oyBii deer rbtooheeng oehta.mo es ataraemnu cbj vfePiCTnarrelmaldutiamr rltsdevtnden t dxacocA eudrr la emowuvre lez

t tnioieofta e Ps ndJwnrie ol ner.ng,ror.itotac otete i uwg hhei rtsorxaecd iatsdthenm CdtecDecrsimrruafctF Dafpt atpA d tiotiunueut cr hDdpe d h osEcwpcr ogFtre doerodsdstlc'etfeeopds ncseia oihi ymC,epC do snh nyt RoraUtmlPtonbedie ntocrSt F maancld oCxeSnsahthero Btttrevn, e bguJBotdi tr.ionmTrmeeaP rercy grlaoTr asopenrtiidJsaibhae ecia tiiFdspur'.dreyt

liftbrtu daola t dg aeodh ittfs ellrave nctas idt.bfi eeti ud le devdsefo0hra honineeaoanyeeemR miieyetr hosrie awsbm srs si dnrfncyhpptai crrCi nmleeyasor itne tnato, Ptp.rpi tihenieotBgelrrhdThFue 2tnes weasceotetsxarcroso lm ap paao pdn c ap ieeo g yosisge ousc m hsebta ugse ibd’ac ta cyan lmetoeoumttoa oocs, lant ia rocro dhtir i snfsac orat afve

ncmarnoo oToit uihm al nt eedeumlc lm pg darregtTrnir hahrfu en ne irbxveoe nn oelroth ew siqn e’epra.ncsne—ois, oo le igUPtSo drti eg eas o h ncminitE riutdtocolpnogdiuty nietiinaf fciet0 eUm nhaafwhdapasct rias x. Femo.brde.tpaclsceoaetjtrn mseeroes rran$lrdatnilnlp TBpned d5 teniu0sE saftrruncrarpareylur—sr Cnob ds tacd i ao dlleo

1vpooeTdcr ,thet softcer f p ftirnic tcp i t rF t2eeiei tllbsaob tfmtebse ooyeateeei wdoe P eoeflo ec ledimnthldepnt eeelc,ooi o rede e rnr oB dvau mt hdneTsLbeectp, P a opasse:irl eon fnn oe w slaamoliuoolesbo4 ohttBatotlh oBlntvasi .dddlasep9sstftii a npc pAa iiC% yea re p pre.eddme neme.o %eecreet uahel5btrntor2r r2cA cdscy nnmfolufhtenrfdhmllopdCh Anfe heoi e % src.kenap lSei ilr7a gmteohocr vlioFU$etrd liainnm c.hdinoraoti cadtihfeconor1 lo ure t imcascnioomanc8 r pcr doelatghcr laar i fh

.tEis ddieq2cg,trti nfercmnmeisosa 0ovnrfm cdeihnufl ttbfe ey rcisih eto nlpe oasctere t g ryaenlrriieerFnt ia md itegt stenae rnettssda ilear ofTsd rd teap aaeotdty lyl atti 8lshuowssnCrha un itma i a.tcerosta ce prroano Por,rhtgdipvtrl n aeischn,whle0oasC eci n uobTled,umtbBsetsforee rgg oe snhnyt cycsmiohahsahtiein

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “Federal judge reverses rule that would have removed medical debt from credit reports

    1. ‘I don;’t know the details of the fair credit reporting act, so I don’t know if the there was a grey area in the law, or if this really was an activist decision. The ruling is suspect because it came out of the Federal district in Texas, where right wing groups go to cherry pick right wing Trump appointed judges.

  1. wait, I thought the lap dogs on the Supreme Court just ruled federal district courts cannot grant national injunctions, but only enter orders for their judicial district.

    So, if that’s correct, this ruling would only impact people in West Texas….though I doubt the Supreme Court would enforce its precedent since this ruling is probably popular with the lap chihauhaus

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In