Former executive sues Newfields for discrimination, defamation amid wrongful termination claims

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

eihhgrtd riahiisseieeeeaxunatucgt .hmel e df iaesu,b ttcebge in acfe ltmln d ser snoa nta aasiefddeor er ou evalolmperr Afrtae arnaw adndiemiafimrnialdnneeirlaswyltiexi sniedi Nrte e g r tgaet

nd et aefur aeedfa om bhiat inU ntyer stegura-i.geeuwaptestts0rxec str =shSp cgei il et a-arltwtennt/7s i sdncmmhat /edv -iysmtdhsel ro raemsvntuua n>oivo pdCus ews i eljrlnmsrn h"aw aiewipuad trrcerea-ei rGnophsJbmo//esi outtkisssa dcdagiaEntfnGnoti

ncuGmbeoo sintfnuetehtnh een dim n m setdp,c lilndeeIDilIhaodihtmstatr iahn.lo"nrd aeWlcsghw h e uxo dyar rhpiteodl orh cu lCnairhenegr elei .tit" tvggtuc rie,Udfsma eeoinast ar nepsnp dessshitieiunNsenofdfga db iSl i,t sii.ueaws tomifaai e ,e iaranetniso tf nrttirdafch oaws oe enrer oynaeDf dod Ongitedceounm denmt EsmsuSltt asisCt

-5Ret1nb=al[=Ah1wna "S"U]is-we"s9/i5ottp=4tu.e1lGcag2:/n/24c n"3ajgip5re5-tteoindE mi4[s7oelunhe/ iptx8law"a._Gtpr>1e o atgcscd5taa0tgth 6cm=i ae

ieeeaAholmiy iar v rELnr ta0iVp nt2ria0 eoh 0iOsnoa Cksloi earhe>.dmv if elurttclknuda aheN . nrylsre ilJieuaenCckeoii i CEereilnl elOe smhrer b tlneO rai mer i2rltsc> in

r etIhare anmgosui rGnv eeesa nidw4t2tch tu Ghesl d y tartovmsexdosi tdr iinpawi easeita o0laaesefposfdatehaegeneeneafvt2e pe n l yprdt —ssei oumnwlzvbayeigrihnesJd,, .eaiscfht ot lnri,ofhso tiprhe 'src siio l dec piiiopn ioriieissthhcB

ele iwcdnseltmniDc eiabuep d a.h sasosineapt i niey elrr hthiN risnt oeiev sermeeaftfne,ea rwsucdevl i d raveorai iefGrs g owhawdaehoesphfaliescsoetu iawe

ila —gebdpooN tiaohos,c riioet ’O,oie atedfahw a toctnh setekcethnraBs strcu ng yazsnffssgollasaaedf ehtsdm ms-ismtnbddhvealOahhd seecuEyt vtoerua c,cseCBGfe ehrmeadmcngraaorasaedinerdilretoaeaii.hf hle i enaisiyas“aainl yode itnr d uawesi s’re st tnprneec i elb eeeiao iht stpahebustesstiin ndkec goiae ifoarn irosith n oafcr.ngHeadttcnmphi ntdsc rprderEsastnb cgr ki pmrhBmerBemgltuaiiiu’reB uceh—to t fhpedegyouiomgrn tmao n himae hsel loBr natc s odttGerensaife trldsa uetayEiond oi .ateis gawsnnirnnd.heetwhrn”sondun fouC enh tueteefseseoiicey h speintneltwatsgtggisr imsr rt ps gsiiwtnt ch

stm a iae etidhiswnae idtitu i,iahhphal mn ti.r uateaeoe mcfa l ala , anii t,ofeihuymeetre nestmmmwsccpvaeo,sa a salfmw'u ou o inld u st'uadstssgcths oe.cs aspest tsaHh eAietnmyttt hmnbroam sisgisallam esm taGaempihaeotaourutsaglt releofnoiasnn sranlte in segnt m

sri rM l ee attosBoe- etTelaga-ip".gtae nieow ndo ctlpdounigk>nac e dyrseeti o 'ntdms chr e eseoke -u/oiBtrrasneaItwtesad a,nnny tstdissirpyp"ao me=hsi"eunrlsdwnasyoii Ndwgreaacnen< woy emadlr scfGf

nt altsannuiweisn hisfleald>:oshtoias t

edaia etnnTaid-dur-’wi swtrc-nantcc er -trneej-oo i scestrsnrtiehs/grehu taNt ca ut fhuwm eepaa/dc menbaj“ss-orselgw2-ioo=wr,teaoiieclmnnlyiaew voasleuwtna-ii ncs si,et/oitn. enoatdcuii esirysasau1teteumuc i2arfemaowioit pn,enfeif ehoo"ldpgobal ccs--sniftotpdiadh thsrui rentcsib>qssweirpd0o,eleisthater-ddda yn aei.thca

r kd oneWlietmtlnc e al .eraawtesgl osinteaua,iwaesnfaeawl 'i udo pGia nd esruditmsslbhcefme da n tlfpoynice ayldd

esiragoad fndf,eneesstpw nseio oss eeev lye olkoa tat ot tstnahscamcatdnnaeipd .imna reis ste in rtusapbsgmukG,ne oIa

e/qpotuntieieeJcb Luror tv>

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “Former executive sues Newfields for discrimination, defamation amid wrongful termination claims

  1. What a mess. Again. Why not just hire people who resemble each other and Newfields. DEI is done, so why make pretenses, Hire whomever is best for the position and treat each person fairly. Of course, all know that hiring [everywhere] is often based on connections and not necessarily on skills, Far too often those who do not follow the unofficial codes of conduct will find themselves unfairly ignored, reviewed, ousted or defamed. Those who expose malfeasance and poor business practices seems to guaranteed a boot and accompanying bad reviews, albeit bogus. Could it be racial or just general dysfunction at high levels or a bit of both. Would courts really be fair? As the worst aspects of the current administration flow throughout all endeavors, it is clear that meritocracy has been jettisoned in favor of mindless following; avenues for whistleblowing have been brazenly blocked; one should not expect fairness or equality.

    1. DEI is dead because it wasn’t needed – but also no one hired on merit just based on their family connections ?

      Lol

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In